I can be pretty hard on President Obama. He's broken promises on transparency. His regulation of the financial sector leaves much to be desired. He supports horrible laws. In the midst of all that disappointment, one can lose track of the fact that while he may be continuing many of the last administration's worst policies, Obama is not George W. Bush. The previous president decided that these guys deserved Presidential Medals of Freedom, the country's highest civilian honor:That's a whole heaping bag of fail right there. From left to right, we have the guy who screwed up the intelligence before the Iraq War (George Tenet), the guy who screwed up the troop numbers for the Iraq War (Gen. Tommy Franks), the Decider himself, and the guy who screwed up the Iraq occupation (L. Paul Bremer). Later, Gen. Peter Pace, noted homophobe, also got himself a shiny medal.
The current president has slightly different criteria for awarding this prestigious honor. His list includes Stephen Hawking, Billie Jean King, Sidney Poitier, two Nobel Peace Prize winners, and (tear) Harvey Milk, among others. It really makes that parade of fail above look especially pathetic. It's a small thing, but it is, for once, some real change.
Is Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) out of line? Senators Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) are questioning the California Republican's motivations for investigating Countrywide Financial's VIP loan program, through which both of the Democrats received financing. "I find it very odd to be investigated and never given a chance to give my side of the story," Conrad tells Politico. "I think that’s unusual." Says Dodd, who's hanging on for dear life to his Senate seat: "This is just too coincidental."
Issa's a pretty committed ideologue, so trying to stir up trouble for his Democratic rivals certainly wouldn't be out of character. But even if his motivations are political, that doesn't mean Countrywide's lending practices and influence-peddling loan program shouldn't be thoroughly investigated. A different question is whether it's appropriate for Issa to be investigating fellow lawmakers in the first place. Former House general counsel Stanley Brand says Issa has stepped "way, way out of bounds" and that the House oversight committee in general lacks the authority to investigate the ethics of a Senator. That job belongs to the Senate ethics committee, a body not known for its hard-nosed investigative prowess but which is nevertheless moving forward with an inquiry into the Countrywide loans handed out to Dodd and Conrad.
While we're on the subject of earmarks...the Post has a discouraging snippet in a piece about defense pork that shows just how tough it is to get rid of even the most ludicrous projects. The piece notes that Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) has vowed to try and remove 540 earmarks for no-bid contracts from the defense budget bill. The catch? "His prior earmark-stripping efforts have succeeded only once in dozens of attempts, and never on defense spending."
Update: The House is debating Flake's amendments now (he's offered one for every no-bid earmark). You can follow along on Twitter if you'd like a blow-by-blow on all 540 of them. They're up to 315 right now...
President Obama has said repeatedly he thinks Don't Ask, Don't Tell is bad policy that "hurts our national security," but he wants Congress to take the lead in rescinding the law. We can all see the logic here: It would continue a terrible Bush-era precedent (not to mention reek of hypocrisy) if Obama were to issue an executive order eliminating an act of Congress.
We all understand that logic. But I'm having trouble understanding this: Florida House Democrat Alcee Hastings introduced an amendment this week to a military appropriations bill that would cut off funds for Don't Ask, Don't Tell investigations. The next day, he says, colleagues in Congress and in the White House urged him to withdraw the amendment, which he did.
Why would the White House get in Congress' way? The Senate has already committed to hearings on DADT; the House's bill to eliminate the policy has 165 cosponsors. It's not as if quashing Hastings' amendment will slow the momentum. Or will it? Because what kind of message does this send to House members unsure about whether or not to support DADT's end?
Last night, Hastings tried to make sense of it with Rachel Maddow.
While the health care debate has been consumed by the smoke and mirrors game on Capitol Hill, one big story is being overlooked: the Obama administration’s decision not to regulate—or even attempt to regulate—the insurance industry, led by AIG, the giant outfit at the center of the national financial collapse. Instead of curbing the power of these companies, Obama is proposing another one of his half-hearted solutions. This time, it’s something called the Office of National Insurance, to be stuck in a corner of the Treasury Department. This new contraption is meant to “monitor’’ insurance—but can’t get involved in setting rules or regulating the business.
Kelefa Sanneh's profile of right-wing radio talker Michael Savage in this week's New Yorker is insightful in many respects. Most notable is its appreciation that Savage is an extremely idiosyncratic guy, and that it's his personal hang-ups that fuel his daily program, The Savage Nation, as much or even more than his political leanings. The 67-year-old Savage is, Sanneh observes, "a marvellous storyteller, a quirky thinker, and an incorrigible free-associator. He sometimes sounds less like a political commentator than like the star of a riveting and unusually vivid one-man play." All true, and it's part of why his show draws in fans and foes alike.
Yet in Sanneh's account, Savage comes off as the crotchety old uncle of the conservative radio world, an amusingly apoplectic, ultimately harmless crank. That's too bad, because as one of the few mainstream journalists to get access to Savage's inner sanctum (i.e., his seaside home in tony Tiburon, California), Sanneh had a unique opportunity to reconcile Savage's showmanship and charisma with his toxic political rhetoric, which runs the gamut from raw homophobia to annihilationist fantasies about illegal immigrants and Muslims. Instead of taking Savage at his word, Sanneh went soft on him.
Rep. Pete Sessions — the chief of the Republicans’ campaign arm in the House — says on his website that earmarks have become “a symbol of a broken Washington to the American people.”
Yet in 2008, Sessions himself steered a $1.6 million earmark for dirigible research to an Illinois company whose president acknowledges having no experience in government contracting, let alone in building blimps.
What the company did have: the help of Adrian Plesha, a former Sessions aide with a criminal record who has made more than $446,000 lobbying on its behalf.
You can't make this up. Someone's balloon ought to get popped.
You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.
Important news from press secretary Robert Gibbs on the Skip-Gates-controversy-ending beer-sharing planned at the White House later today:
The President will drink Bud Light. As I understand it—I have not heard this, I've read this, so I'll just repeat what I've read, that Professor Gates said he liked Red Stripe, and I believe Sergeant Crowley mentioned to the President that he liked Blue Moon. So we'll have the gamut covered tomorrow afternoon. I think we're still thinking, weather permitting, the picnic table out back. All right?
I, for one, am outraged that Barack Obama would drink a furrin-owned beer like Bud Light, which is owned by the pot-smokingfrites-eating, universal health care-having, freedom-hating Dutch Belgians (Sorry. I often get my low-lying western European countries confused). Clearly the president should be drinking a true American beer like Sam Adams, which is not only owned by Americans, but also named after a great American hero. Boston Beer Company, which makes Sam Adams, is actually only the second-largest American-owned brewery. Here are the top American choices, in order of size, viaForeign Policy's Travis Daub, with commentary and notes by yours truly:
Pabst Blue Ribbon (video has NSFW language). It's worth noting that Pabst doesn't brew its own beer anymore, but outsources it to a South African conglomerate:
Boston Beer Company/Sam Adams
Yuengling, otherwise known as "lager" in Pennsylvania and its environs. Seriously—go order a lager at a Philly bar and see what you get.
Please donate a few dollars to the Mother Jones Investigative Fund! We're a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, and we rely on YOU to support our fiercely independent reporting. Your donation is fully tax-deductible, and it takes just a moment to give. Thanks!