Political MoJo

What Kim Jong Il Won't be Getting for Christmas

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 6:10 PM EST

Kim Jong Il has made a sport of defying U.S. efforts to halt his country's burgeoning nuclear program, essentially thumbing his nose at the international community in October by staging North Korea's first nuclear test. Today, after the U.S. government's latest diplomatic overture failed, the Bush administration was forced to take swift and decisive action intended to hit Kim where it hurts – that is, to cut off exports of luxury goods, such as yachts, plasma TVs, Rolexes, and iPods to North Korea in conjunction with the U.N. Also embargoed is Kim's favorite French cognac, Hennessy, which is certain to agitate "Dear Leader," who is reputed to purchase upwards of $700,000 per year of the stuff. As the AP points out, these trade sanctions seem squarely targeted at Kim, a connoisseur of the finer things in life, who's one of the few people in the impoverished nation who can afford to indulge his taste for extravagances. It remains to be seen whether this effort will bring North Korea back into the diplomatic fold. But one would think that Kim, whose regime has successfully negotiated the nuclear black market, probably won't have a great deal of trouble getting his hands on some outlawed hooch.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Pop Quiz: Who Is the Lamest Duck?

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 5:07 PM EST

The New York Times got hold of a secret memo in which National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley describes the lameness of a world leader. Who is it?

"He impressed me as a leader who wanted to be strong but was having difficulty figuring out how to do so."

"The information he receives is undoubtedly skewed by his small circle of [deleted word] advisers, coloring his actions and interpretation of reality."

"The reality on the streets of Baghdad suggests [name deleted] is either ignorant of what is going on, misrepresenting his intentions, or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action."

"He may simply not have the political or security capabilities to take such steps, which risk alienating his narrow [deleted word] political base."

Sounds familiar, right? Of course I gamed the quotes by deleting the words Dawa, Maliki, and Sadrist, but it still made me wonder if Hadley was painting a portrait of Maliki in terms that he thought Bush might understand.

Full text of Hadley's brutally honest November 8 Maliki memo for cabinet-level officials here.

Powell: We Should Call it Civil War

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 4:20 PM EST

CNN's Hala Gorani reports today that in conversation, Colin Powell told her that "if he were still heading the State Department, he probably would recommend to the Bush administration that those terms [civil war] should be used in order to come to terms with the reality on the ground."

This debate of whether or not to finally apply the label "civil war" began with the eruption of violence over the weekend, with CNN's Michael Ware reporting, "For the people living on the streets, for Iraqis in their homes, if this is not civil war, or a form of it, then they do not want to see what one really looks like.... We're talking about Sunni neighborhoods shelling Shia neighborhoods, and Shia neighborhoods shelling back."

Soon after, NBC decided it would use the phrase, Dan Froomkin nodded approvingly, and we were off to the races. The Nation writes today that this may signal the true awakening of the mainstream media.

The real confusion here, of course, lies in the fact that no firm or commonly accepted definition of "civil war" exists, coupled with the fact that we live in time in which words and phrases, bent in a million different ways and co-opted for the purposes of spin, retain little meaning. Unsurprisingly, The Daily Show makes this point best.

2008 Prez Candidates Update

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 3:58 PM EST

Movement amongst the longshots. Joe Biden is in, though we kind of already knew that. Bill Frist, officially the least likeable Republican in America, is out.

No word on Barack Hussein Obama.

Polish Kid: "My Half-Year of Hell With Christian Fundamentalists"

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 2:46 PM EST

There are a million things that are funny about this. It's almost like someone made it up; if they did, we're playing the willing suckers here at Mother Jones.

The facts are simple. (1) A Polish student named Michael came to America for a study abroad term. (2) He was placed with an evangelical family in North Carolina. (3) Hilarity ensued.

Here are the highlights:

- The first thing the family told Michael when he landed at the airport was "Child, our Lord sent you half-way around the world to bring you to us." Michael immediately wanted to get back on the plane to Poland.

- Every Monday, the family gathered around the kitchen table to talk about sex. The parents had not had sex in 17 years.

- The family told Michael that he had the devil in his heart. The family told Michael that his mother had the devil in her heart.

- Michael realized part of the way through his stay that the family had only agreed to house him because he could help them set up an evangelical church in Poland. A bit opportunistic, no?

How is this not a sitcom already? To Mike, we're not all like that, we promise. Perhaps you should swing by the Bay Area next time and sample some of our "San Francisco Values." And to Wonkette, who found this on Der Spiegel, keep fighting the good fight, folks.

Columnist Says Gay Marriage Is Linked To Out-Of-Wedlock Births

| Wed Nov. 29, 2006 1:47 PM EST

You have to stretch your neck and spin your head around to even try to grasp Brendan Miniter's reasoning in his Wall Street Journal column of yesterday. Miniter writes that there is a connection between gay marriage and the rise in out-of-wedlock births in the U.S.

What? Okay, Miniter has an explanation for this assertion, right? Wrong. He claims that "Although advocates of same-sex marriage will deny there is any connection..." between gay marriage and increased out-of-wedlock births, he does not utter a word about why there would be such a connection.

Miniter says that, according to reports from the National Center for Health Statistics, teen pregnancy is down, but more unmarried women in their 20s and 30s are having children. The only possible related explanation, of course, is that those women are lesbians and that they are in gay marriages. However, very, very few gay Americans are married, since gay marriage is rarely permitted. And lesbians and gay men who want children have children, regardless of whether they are fortunate enough to be married (if that is what they choose).

So add to marriage to family members and children and marriage to dogs and cats, an increase in out-of-wedlock births if gay marriage is permitted. And I'll add some: divorce, spousal abuse, child abuse, and infidelity. Oh, wait...we already have those.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Video: Inside the Home of an Iraqi Civilian Family

| Tue Nov. 28, 2006 9:41 PM EST

Via Show Us the War, filmmaker Mark Manning goes inside the home of a civilian family in Fallujah that has lost loved ones in the war. Very powerful stuff.

 iraq_house_screenshot.gif

Five Children (One an Infant) Killed In Ramadi

| Tue Nov. 28, 2006 9:18 PM EST

A clash between Iraqi insurgents and U.S. Marines has resulted in the deaths of five girls, the oldest of whom was ten and the youngest of whom was six months. Insurgents standing on the roof of a house fired at the Marines, who responded with tank fire.

The incident occurred in Ramadi, which is seventy miles west of Baghdad. It was triggered by the Marines' discovery of a homemade bomb on the side of the road. They were working at diffusing the bomb when insurgents on the nearby rooftop opened fire.

Ramadi is a stronghold for Sunni Arab militants.

Limitations to Robo Calls May be Forthcoming

| Tue Nov. 28, 2006 3:33 PM EST

A Federal Trade Commission proposal likely going into effect in January will prohibit telemarketers from making "robo calls" to any customer -- unless a customer gives written permission to do so.

It is impossible to tell if this is a long-planned development, a product of Barack Obama getting serious, or a result of Mother Jones' strenuous coverage of the issue. I think we all know the answer.

Michael Crichton Plugs Mother Jones

| Tue Nov. 28, 2006 3:26 PM EST
crichton.gif

Well, not exactly. In our big package on global-warming deniers last year, Bill McKibben dinged Michael Crichton's State of Fear for combining "all the clichés of pulp fiction (heaving breasts, cannibals, poisoning by octopi)" with a deliberate misreading of the science of climate change. After quietly stewing for two years, Crichton has struck back. From today's New York Times review of his latest distraction for cross-country fliers: "Next does occasionally turn ham-handed: one of its resident idiots is a whiny environmentalist who reads Mother Jones and thinks genetic modification could make cool protest art." Snap!

Meanwhile, having conclusively disproved global warming, Crichton has moved on. According to his website, "Michael has completed all interviews/speaking engagements regarding State of Fear and related themes and will not be revisiting these subjects in the future." Guess not even breasts and cannibals could convince Hollywood to buy that screenplay. Better luck with this one, Michael!