MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Schlock and Awwww: Commercializing Altruism

Arts: Every week, Ty Pennington brings the American Dream to a deserving family. What a freakin' jerk.

November/December 2007 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


"in charity," Francis Bacon wrote, "there is no excess." But then Bacon never saw Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, which since 2003 has been meting out garish and super-sized acts of charity—each more skillfully choreographed and excessive than the last—every Sunday night on abc.

Each week, the reality show's "design team," led by cloying carpenter Ty Pennington, parks its tour bus at the dilapidated doorstep of a deserving, downtrodden family and unleashes a whopping assault of good will. After hugging the family, Pennington commiserates in his hushed tone of surferesque sincerity (he often talks to people as if they are crying, even if they haven't yet started) and then offers hope. "Here's the good news," he tells a single mother in Mississippi whose three children have learned to defecate in plastic bags because they have no plumbing. "We're here now, and things are going to get better."

Typically, at this point the family is whisked off to Disney World and the design team begins demolishing its house and building a better one—fully landscaped and prominently decorated with brand-name appliances and furnishings supplied by Sears, Home Depot, and the show's other sponsors—in one week. The family returns to a crowd of neighbors, volunteer builders, and well-wishers chanting "Move that bus!" before the team's motor coach peels away from the curb, revealing the new home.

Just like that, Makeover plucks poor or working-class people from their misfortunes and not only gives them a new Owens Corning roof over their heads, but—the implication is—newfound stability and comfort. Often the family also gets a new car, computers, or college scholarships for the kids. These changes can be profound. That Mississippi mom, reeling beside her new Ford Edge suv while Pennington shouts, "It looks great, it's fun to drive, and best of all it's all yours!" mentions that she's never owned a new car before. Suddenly we grasp the life-changing enormity of just giving her a reliable vehicle. But wait—here are an iPod, modern art, bicycles, a karaoke machine, Panasonic flat-screen TVs, a collection of African percussion for her son, and a spacious new storefront for her fledgling business. Plus, gospel singer CeCe Winans has turned up to raise the family a nest egg!

We are increasingly tuning in to this brand of life-affirming transformation, whether it's Ty and the gang framing up a starter mansion, Madonna whisking children out of Malawi and into the tabloids, Oprah opening a school for impoverished South African girls, or Michael Moore—spouting the kind of schmaltzy platitudes Pennington has perfected—delivering sick and forgotten 9/11 rescue workers to the handsome Cuban doctors who will treat them for free.

These are feel-good narratives, meticulously polished to make us feel good about ourselves, too. With each cathartic conclusion, it's easy to believe that we are contributing to the healing when in fact we are just watching TV. Moreover, the ideal of domesticity into which Makeover deposits its families—the outsized house, the stainless-steel appliances and items from the Sears "Ty Pennington Style" collection—feeds our love of consumption and luxury; nobody tunes in to watch Habitat for Humanity build multiple modest houses. Frankly, the whole package is irresistible. More than once, I have caught myself mouthing "Move that bus!" along with the crowd.

And yet even as I am moved by such acts of kindness, I also feel an uncontrollable urge to cut them down. Makeover is schlock. But as reality TV increasingly concocts its schlock out of actual hardship and actual kindness, deriding it can open some unsettling moral terrain. I felt a certain smugness, for example, watching American Idol's "Idol Gives Back" fundraising special last April. There was Ryan Seacrest, fresh from handing out meals to aids orphans in Kenya, clutching a child and urging him to just "let it out." And there I was: sitting on my couch, eating a tremendous burrito, scoffing at the man who had traveled across the globe to feed orphans.

Clearly, something was wrong. I have never fed aids orphans. I have never built anyone a house. By these measures, I don't stack up very well at all against Ty Pennington and his cadre of extreme prime-time altruists.

I feel only slightly less conflicted about mocking Makeover knowing that it can't always deliver the fairy-tale endings it suggests. Several newspaper reports have exposed how some Makeover families wind up unprepared for their new, exponentially higher utility bills and property taxes. A blind New Jersey man with three disabled children and a $14,000 tax bill on his new abode told one paper, "With all the taxes, it's like we're on a chopping block." Meanwhile, five siblings featured on an Easter Sunday 2005 episode recently sued their adoptive parents for driving them out of the nine-bedroom, six-bathroom house built for them. They also sued the show for rebroadcasting their episode knowing that its ending had soured. The kids' attorney happily revealed to the Los Angeles Times that the show's touching "door knock" scene, in which the design team first arrived at the house and dispensed hugs, took seven takes to shoot.

Even infrequent viewers will notice how the show has tightened its stranglehold on our consciences by gradually inflating its misery quotient. While the first season featured a couple that needed a larger home for its (surprise!) triplets, only two seasons later we were deep into a gallery of woe: twins with leukemia, the mother of a little girl who wandered off to catch fireflies and disappeared forever. In a memo acquired by the Smoking Gun website, a producer asks the show's casting agents to look for a kid with "congenital insensitivity to pain": "There are 17 known cases in US, let me know if one is in your town!"

It's easy to resent Makeover for the ways it simultaneously helps and exploits its beneficiaries. But when it comes down to it, I resent Makeover because it exploits me. I can feel it bullying me for my compassion, extracting it with a ham-fisted conspiracy of narration, editing, and musical accompaniment. What ultimately offends me about Makeover is that it takes humanity and turns it into bad art. It's an affront to my aesthetics more than my morals.

There's some solace, perhaps, in knowing that kindness is popular enough to be shamelessly commodified—that charity sells. And that thankfully, not everyone who comes into contact with the show is distracted by its wretched artifice. "I really think a community could do this without the cameras, without Hollywood," a Missouri woman told a local paper after Makeover wrapped an episode in her town. After all, all of the labor on the show is volunteer. And while few community groups could get the truckloads of lavish furnishings Makeover does without the kickback of prime-time exposure, not everyone needs cameras trained on them in order to act selflessly.

Wasn't it stirring to see so many people racing down to the Gulf Coast to contribute plywood, sweat, and compassion after Hurricane Katrina? Witnessing the efforts of volunteers in her hometown of Pass Christian, Mississippi, Good Morning America's Robin Roberts felt compelled to remind viewers, "This is not Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. This is true reality TV."

But even "true reality TV" demands that no act of genuine altruism be left unhyped. And so Roberts signaled for a humongous banner to be pulled away, revealing the progress made on rebuilding one woman's home. But there was more. "CeCe Winans is going to sing for us," Roberts smiled. "She's gonna lift our spirits with song!"

Illustration: John Cuneo



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Commercializing Altruism -Youtube -The Tabloid Art Ready Reference (How to Be Entertaining In New Ways) link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emKF_Tb5JTU
Posted by:World Wide WebDecember 6, 2007 8:25:57 PMRespond ^
Thanks for this article. I HATE THAT GUY!!! He is the ultimate shlock master and needs to be stopped. Just thinking about that dude makes me ill.
Posted by:DarienDecember 7, 2007 11:20:51 AMRespond ^
You could just stop watching. I'd never heard of this before your article because, well, I don't own a television. Why waste your time on it?
Posted by:GrelykDecember 7, 2007 12:10:48 PMRespond ^
I do not know what to think sometimes. It's damned if you do and damned if you don't. I seldom watch the show for the reasons you have noted yet there is good that comes out of it.
Posted by:GaryDecember 7, 2007 12:20:33 PMRespond ^
Ever seen the documentation they produce for you to look at before you apply on someone's behalf to be featured on that show? You have to produce a home video showing the house and family that you'd like "made over," and they give you guidelines on how to present it. They tell you what clothes to wear (and not), advise you to dress everyone nicely and how, give you makeup tips, tell you what language to use (and not) -- there's more, but it's all scripted, rigidly organized, and uniform. Otherwise, your app doesn't even pass the first screeening. So this is a fairly topical issue here: remember, we were sold "authenticity" by the TV-based media in the form of a down-home, plain-talking good ol' boy from Crawford, TX who was such better TV fare than that bland, cold, stiff Democrat from Tennessee...It's the same medium, the same style, the same kind of message.
Posted by:Brian DonohueDecember 7, 2007 12:24:44 PMRespond ^
It's the 1950's cry-a-thon "Queen for a Day" on steroids. I always wondered how these families managed the higher taxes, utilities and resentful neighbors after they were moved into these monuments to conspicuous consumption. At least "Queen for a Day" only gave away applicances, not entire houses filled with wretched excess.
Posted by:BarbDecember 7, 2007 12:35:42 PMRespond ^
And I didn't buy into either of them!! They're both ("W" and this stupid TV show) are completely transparent and moronic! Get a brain & read a book!
Posted by:Ewan MeeDecember 7, 2007 12:37:57 PMRespond ^
I agree that Extreme Makeover is "over the top", but then our society is like other empires in their death-thoes -- cake and circuses, smoke and mirrors. I watch EM, and I'll tell you why. We are a society that has romanticized and glorified violence until it has become a part of our very being. We have romanticized and glorified excess the same way. Examples of this are CEO salaries in the millions while they outsource our country; movie stars and sports figures, who earn millions entertaining us, being made out as role models. And the combination of the two -- DieHard, Rambo, Terminator and other violent movies, ad nauseum, and a government that is convinced to its core that violence is the answer to any question -- is it George "Rambo" Bush this week or is Dick Chaney acting as "the Terminator"? What EM brings to us -- and what its popularity proves is something we hunger for -- is a reaching out and establishing of a sense of community and caring. I appreciate that companies are rewarded for participating. I could shop at another big box store or at Sears. Sears has chosen to throw its weight behind this show and I will shop there. If I need tile for my bathroom remodel, I'll buy Daltile for the same reason. Yes, I know these companies are buying advertising. I know they will write off their contributions to the show, but you know what? I don't care. I'm bombarded with commercials every time I turn on the tv. What do these OTHER companies do to buy my support? Nothing but bore me with inane advertising. The advertisers on EM are giving something back. The thing I like best about EM is how it brings together a community wherever it stops. Ordinary people get involved. It may be that they do it because they'll be on TV. Maybe to meet Ty and his crew. Or, just maybe because they want to have that sense of giving and sharing that comes with being involved. And, once that door is open they will always carry that experience in their hearts and hopefully go on to participate in other ways. They meet like-minded people; those whose lives are improved by this sharing will go on to share with others, paying forward. When I watch EM, I cheer for the family, I smile at Ty's antics, and when the show is over my heart has grown and I take that feeling out into my own community and participate. I don't think I'm alone in that. There is an awful lot wrong in our society. Maybe,just maybe, a little kernel of compassion, giving, caring comes out of watching shows like this. Maybe people who otherwise don't know HOW to become involved or WHERE to start, will look around and actually SEE the need around them, and participate. And that's why I watch, EM. Besides, Ty's got a cute butt.
Posted by:michelle staplesDecember 7, 2007 12:47:16 PMRespond ^
I cannot stand Ty! I enjoyed his smart-ass carryings-on on Trading Places or was it "Spaces". That, I'm sure is the real Ty. At least then he came across and honest and funny. Now, I believe nothing he says. Idea- instead of building one house the owner cannot afford to keep up, for the same money and effort, build ten normal houses in New Orleans.
Posted by:Mike BDecember 7, 2007 12:57:09 PMRespond ^
I work for a TV show which has done this. We worked with a volunteer organization to restore homes for families. I volunteered my time and talent along with dozens of others, and when the ratings didn't jump, the show dumped the project. Sad. True. In my heart, we all hoped we weren't being used as tools in a promotional campaign, and that the effort was truly humanitarian. When that happened, however, I made it very clear to the producers that I felt like my good-faith volunteering effort was violated, and I stopped "volunteering" through the show. Now I'm looking for another job.
Posted by:leftypowerDecember 7, 2007 12:59:47 PMRespond ^
I have a chronic, degenerative disease and I would love to have the schlock and awwww team come to visit me with solutions to my accessible housing needs. I would welcome any assistance available, even if it meant conforming to a scripted application process. What solutions to these kinds of needs would you all recommend? It's easy to say what may not work, but it is much more difficult to propose alternatives.
Posted by:AngelaDecember 7, 2007 1:00:04 PMRespond ^
Thanks for your honesty. I too have had pangs of self hatred whenever I watch it. I think of all the families who could use a fraction of what 1 family gets to better their circumstances. I think the current arrangement is a bit over the top. Is there a point-counter upstairs to get them to the front of the pearly gates? It almost seems that way. And do those 'volunteers' continue to help the lessers of us when the lights and cameras are gone?
Posted by:bethedolphinDecember 7, 2007 1:10:00 PMRespond ^
I have quit watching these shows (any that have HUGE money rewards in particular) because it keeps our collective eye off the real ball that's bouncing through our neighborhoods: poverty, lack of quality public schools, lack of employment, high utlitity bills, lack of medical care or insurance for example. What it tells us is IF we are really GOOD we'll get all the stuff we need for free from these "reality" shows without asking what is our government doing to help solve these social issues?
Posted by:Judy LaddDecember 7, 2007 1:45:49 PMRespond ^
I've never watched the show, but when they came to Hawaii there was controversy because the family they 'helped' had a substantial 6-figure income. But I'm sure they deserved the help more than the thousands of homeless living on our beaches.
Posted by:Waimea WitchDecember 7, 2007 2:16:54 PMRespond ^
My mother always said "You never miss what you never had... but if you ever had it and lost it, BOY!!! do you ever miss it." Not particularly profound until you think on it. I've stopped watching the excesses of Extreme Makeover because it became burdensome and worrisome to see these Phoenix families rise from the ashes. I worried how they would ever maintain their newly formed lifestyles, would their teenagers ever want to leave the new nest, could their "old world" acclimate to that 180 degree turn in lifestyle? I also mused that less could mean more. More opportunities for others to share in that sad-sad unfortune state of not living in palatial quarters. What's wrong with a smaller home that accomodates need rather than fantasy? I ponder how in the world we came to believe that we all are royalty, requiring such mansions, such digs? Naw! I decided the message was skewed and I could turn the channel to more "realistic" fare.
Posted by:Sally BDecember 7, 2007 3:00:43 PMRespond ^
Bah Humbug to you, Jon. So what if Sears gets exposure, so what if some of the families, in the end, are not better off. I bet most are and you know, it is doing good. So what if they get TV viewers for their products. Yes, there are still wonderful, good people in the world who do good off camera, but there is nothing wrong doing it on camera as well. You people get me sick, the ones who must find fault with everyone and everything. You'd stomp on Jesus if he came by with his miracles.
Posted by:WithMettaDecember 7, 2007 4:17:31 PMRespond ^
I always wonder how these people can afford to pay their utility bills in these gargantuan homes. Also, sometimes they are building these homes in urban neighborhoods and then showcasing all the loot inside. How long before one of these people is robbed? I don't blame Ty because I'm betting he knows it's schlocky. It's just a job. But I really hate the show. That doesn't mean I don't have a heart. I just hate how white bread it is.
Posted by:BobDecember 7, 2007 6:07:13 PMRespond ^
You were much too kind. For what this orgy of faux generosity spends per family, Habitat for Humanity could build whole communities.It is an exercise in cynicism that brings into question any justification we could offer for our survival as a society.
Posted by:Larry McDDecember 7, 2007 6:25:08 PMRespond ^
Oy! We read a lot. Who has time to watch all the "makeovers"? Once is plenty and there are so many of them!! They go from fat to thin; Scnhozz to noz (plastic Surgery); couch potato to personal "sadist" trainer; homeless to houseful; bedroom singers & copycat bands to superstars. When will it all end? So we read.....
Posted by:Julie HornerDecember 7, 2007 7:38:44 PMRespond ^
Very good article, and it expresses my misgivings also. Ideas that start out good are often taken over by selfish and exploitive persons.
Posted by:Maurice MasarDecember 7, 2007 8:24:45 PMRespond ^
Oh my God! This is unbelievable! Liberals that are against a free handout?! Oh the sweet, sweet irony!
Posted by:afromanDecember 7, 2007 8:41:26 PMRespond ^
I quit watching this show early on because it promoted so much excess consumption. Who needs this much. Its like lottery winners who lose in all! It would mean so much more if they helped people who needed and considered what they really needed.
Posted by:cherry crumDecember 7, 2007 9:01:19 PMRespond ^
I agree with the basic premises of Judy Ladd's 12/7 1:45 comment. My boyfriend loves it, but won't watch it around me because I keep saying the same things throughout each show. My problem with it isn't the scripting making bad theater to look like reality, the advertising, the promoted lifestyle, or even Ty's many excesses. My only problem with the show is that it serves as a release value for our nation's collective outrage at real social problems. Rather than foment justified anger that otherwise might be focused into a movement for real changes that would help millions of people, it allows the nation to feel good because one random family -- essentially a lottery winner -- gets a new house. I would love to see a segment each week tracing the government policies, socioeconomic structures and lack of support services that resulted in the families being in their situations such as lack of socialized medicine, tremendous inequalities in education and a complete ignorance of basic economics or of the way the world works. If we could just devote 5 minutes in each show to ask a simple question each week such as (1) if socialized medicine is so bad, then why haven't any of the other industrialized counties that adopted it abandoned it, or (2) why is education more segregated now than before the civil rights movement, or (3) why are you thanking God for giving you a new house, when millions of other families aren't getting a new house -- does God hate them? Shows like Extreme Makeover: Home Edition prevent us from asking basic questions whose answers seem self-evident once asked because we're blinded by its warm, saccharine glow.
Posted by:David HughesDecember 8, 2007 4:25:12 AMRespond ^
I too feel conflicted by shows like Extreme Makeover. I don't normally watch them, except for a couple of times when I was to lazy or tired do something useful or change the channel. I have to say though, that compared to the usual tripe on TV, it's a good thing. It's easy to be critical of their perhaps less than perfect form of altruism, but at the same time any altruism is better than none. Compare it to shows that exalt anorexic models or drug addled entertainers and it's hard to be overly upset about it all. At least the idea of giving to those in need is better the idea of spending thousands of dollars on consumer goods we don't need or unrealistic body images we can't achieve. If your watching TV, you know that Mother Teresa didn't have what it takes to keep viewers watching week after week. It is what it is- entertainment. We're in a lot of trouble when we start expecting it to be the moral compass of the universe.
Posted by:KatieDecember 8, 2007 10:42:39 AMRespond ^
I hadn't given it much thought prior to this article, but the main point about commercializing charity is very somber. Could this be the last haven left to be exploited by rampant capitalism? Have we denigrated so much like the Romans prior to Roman collapse? I'm beginning to think so, and this is only further evidence. I'm ashamed that I've let my emotions be moved by this series ... just like the producer, writers, and corporate advertisers had hoped.
Posted by:MarkDecember 8, 2007 11:23:49 AMRespond ^
I guess it's your job to pull away the curtain. And shame on us for trying to feel good about a good deed. I mean we all should stay rooted in "real" realty--like the Bush Administration and the war in Iraq---are you going to write about that---that would be much more helpful. Oh too much reality?, OK. How about the mortgage mess--still too much reality. Well thank God there are folks like you to point out to us that we are being played--and I mean that with all sincerity. If you and your ilk could write something that really gets people to feel inspired rather than sukered. But then you would be out of job wouldn't you. I mean you get paid by writing what "they want" And perhaps you feel this is the real you wirting...maybe. But again thank you for your illuminating little artilce.
Posted by:LovebabzDecember 8, 2007 1:40:34 PMRespond ^
Great write-up. I have never been able to stomach the show. We live in a nation where literally millions need genuine help, such as opportunity to make a livable income, fair treatment in housing, education,health care etc. This show epitomizes the hypocrisy and superficiality of this society. It should be called the barf show!
Posted by:raymondDecember 8, 2007 9:34:04 PMRespond ^
Oh, Jon, I *LOVE* this one.. With all the gabillions of $$ spent on advertising anymore, been thunking for ages that I'd love to start seeing advertisers go 180 to extremely simplistic commercials that in part denote the dollar amounts they would have spent on said commercials in the past are now going to help in communities.. The adverse effect would, of course, be that those who don't agree with any given referenced [non-profit] might get bent and stage organized consumer campaigns demanding the advertiser stop or consumer dollars would be diverted to competitors immediately.. Hm, a fella can't Win for Losin', even when it comes to unfruitioned "thunkings".. :giggle: Cyber hugs.. Cindy Sue PS.. Haven't seen very many, but I do cry at "Extreme" just as that one TVLand (?) commercial fortells.. But then I do (and get goose pimples) at the end of "Cold Case" and "Crash", as well so-oh.. :grin:
Posted by:Cindy Sue CauseyDecember 9, 2007 1:00:32 PMRespond ^
thank you so much for clarifying a serious point that nagged me too -- specifically, if makeover recipients were in such dire straits before, how would they manage increased utilities and taxes? thanks for the edification. now i don't feel so guilty about feeling emotionally manipulated
Posted by:ellen sweetsDecember 9, 2007 1:32:29 PMRespond ^
I make a point of never missing Ty, never watch never miss. I know the template, media is full of the tear "jerks." I have some experience with and around construction, it is not possible to construct a quality house in one week. I takes several days just to cure a cement slab. This is all about Ty colleting a check and the true family needs being ignored.
Posted by:JohnDecember 9, 2007 7:56:17 PMRespond ^
I agree with your article, I am glad that you wrote it, and think that you were very gentle with your comments...More so than me! I happened to be in Idaho last summer and my relative insisted that we go to the small town of Middleton to see the festivities because of the Extreme makeover show, building a house for a family with sick children. This was a huge event for this little town, the local Boise station was there, they had local celebrities, even beauty queens. It was a festival....It's nice that this family got help, but it's so excessive, so commercial, so exploitive, on every level, that it's disgusting...I watched this show once in awhile years ago, and your right it get worse every year with the emotional manipulation and the obvious scripting of the families and participants. Because of the Idaho event, I was curious about the final product, and have gone on line to ABC, site (I think, or CBS) where you can watch their episodes after they air..So I have watched a few, three, and still have not seen the Idaho one, but I think it's going to be on this month...I have noticed that they are really trying to stretch the show to keep interest going. The deserving animal activists, community activist, church activists, disease activists...The tour of America, single dad's single moms whole families with a disease, or most of them. A family with some kind hook to evoke sympathy of the viewers.. So very sad, and deserving, yet there are so very many more people out there who are in desperate need with and without children disease or some other heart retching emotional socially acceptable situation! I keep thinking, why can't they build a homeless shelter, a modest, practical, clean shelter. Or build a co-op set of homes where fixed income disabled people (even the unlovable, hated ones who have a mental illness of some kind) can rent to buy their homes without getting taken or swindled..But that wouldn't move the target viewers, (Sears buying, credit card using, extra large flat screen cable tv) middle income Americans. The American's who view renters and homeless as lazy no good scum who have their hand out and expect help! I especially felt really really offended by the Native American family episode, it was just wrong on so many levels. I felt very uncomfortable and embarrassed for this family. Their dignity, and privacy seemed to be ripped away and repackaged, but that is nothing new for the Native Americans. They were in desperate need, but I am not sure what the tv shows intrusion meant in the long run for this family, but it didn't feel right..The people who volunteer their help are doing so for the free advertising, and (promised hyped by the shows sales pitch) huge profits for their business...The families/victims on this show actually earn their rewards, for being exploited, turned into objects/products for profit.It would be interesting to follow every family that has been visited and changed by Ty and the show...The taxes, the upkeep, replacements, heating a larger home, when you are on a fixed income...Getting a taste of the illusion of American good life. A house built in a week will not last long, how can it? These homes turn into slums faster than the old homes that were built to last by craftsmen, with real wood, a lasting solid foundation! The sick values that have put us in a war for oil, pollution, slave labor in 3rd world countries, the extinction of the blue collar middle class is what this show exploits...The program uses the families, exploits their misery, and uses the suckers who watch this....And they lived happily ever after...Ty is so animated, so scripted, (even his name sounds fake/kitchy) that he seems more like a Disney animated robot.. My impressions of what crew I could see in their Idaho caper, was that they are very very burned out and exhausted entertainers, who are doing their time, making hay before their viewers no longer want to watch....Which to me, won't be very much longer. Really after a year or so the formula of poor sick families, with sad stories, even with the various hooks are really just the same old thing! And if we think about it, there are people in every community who are worse off or in the same situation of these upper/lower income home owners..the Extreme show is pretty right wing, materialism propaganda tripe, that assures RW America of the feel good nature of materialism, and helping the truly deserving, God fearing hard working American's who are just, "Down on their Luck" I know that down in Idaho, that's GW country, big SUV's Big Pickups, with guns and Got Bless America, I support our troops, and flag stickers all over their vehicles. The extreem Ty event in Idaho just made my visit oh so very very special, I felt really out my element, as much as a red neck would feel at a Rainbow event!!!!
Posted by:volmaDecember 9, 2007 11:24:27 PMRespond ^
What, you and your type would stomp on Jesus? Like "Your Type", who really stomps on Jesus by supporting war, killing rape and murder, who only will help when the lights and cameras are on?Who hate poor men women and children and would let them starve when Jesus taught most of all to love to help the poor, not to be materialistic...I don't know who your evil Jesus is, or how you managed to take his actual words and teaching and twist them, but the Jesus I was taught about would hate the show, and the materialism, and the values that you seem to hold so dear...Don't even try to use your fake bull crap Christianity which is actually antichristian, you are the people following the antichrist (against the teachings of Christ)that you are so worried about, and pointing fingers at others for, when in truth it's all you, you are the antichrist!....People who have solid values and moral do not worship false idols, like twisted materialism, churches who preach materialism and twist religion to get rich...You totally disgust me, and I have no clue why you would even bother to go on any enlightened, liberal site on the internet...Stick with your TV Gods, evangelists, and shows, that's your realm, and you obviously love it, and belong to it, you are part of the problem, not the solution....You really are a piece of work to try to use your religion and Jesus when you are so obviously an antichristian...Your type has actually turned people away from Christianity because the modern born again evangelicals are so evil, they think that you represent Christianity, which is the opposite of the truth.There are a lot of you out there, you are so hypnotized, that you have sold your souls years ago to your evil God...Hope you will WAKE UP to see the light someday...
Posted by:volmaDecember 9, 2007 11:54:10 PMRespond ^
I have had this discussion several times with my sister, 12 years younger than I, who remember well rushing in from school and tuning in Queen for a Day. I hated the way that show pitted the women against each other in their need, and I hate the "you won the lottery" subtext that leaves the viewer wondering about the families that weren't picked for Extreme Home Makeover. In the end, it reminds us of how little we Americans (and so-called Christians) actually care for each other, remembering, of course, that care is a verb. The vagaries of charity will never replace a societal decision to provide basic needs for all of us, that clean air and water, safe housing, health care, and a good education are fundamental rights, not a sweetener to working hard and becoming well-of. It was gut-churning to watch the Idaho family finally get the medical consultation that could prove life-saving for the four children afflicted with a rare immune disorder. Thanks for speaking my mind, and for allowing me to speak my own.
Posted by:JeanyDecember 10, 2007 8:54:27 AMRespond ^
I wondered about the taxes and upkeep, could see that as a real issue for sure. Its not always so much the initial cost but the cost of maintanence that is so harsh. Still, i have been known to watch and hope it all will work out. somehow.
Posted by:julianne sawinskiDecember 10, 2007 11:13:11 AMRespond ^
Don't watch much tv; I prefer netflix. The few times I've seen Extreme Makeover, I've also wondered how the recipients will deal with taxes, upkeep, the neighbors, etc. I'm repulsed by the extreme commercialization - so much stuff! I get the sense that the recipients are now portrayed as worthy people since they have a 3,000 sq ft home, flat screen tvs and scented candles in every room, a four car garage, a pool, jacuzi, etc. Without the stuff, they were pitiful, sub-human. Now they're ... what? Us? Indoctrinated? I don't know.
Posted by:xandreDecember 10, 2007 12:07:51 PMRespond ^
it's not that you can't win with us liberals, it's that this is just another example of how America works -- what's on the surface. I forgot about Makeover, but have often thought about Oprah's "good" deeds. On one hand it's better than nothing at all, but on the other I just hope she (and all reality exploiters) doesn't think her celebrity TV trip satisfies her/their contribution to society. I whole heartedly agree with those who mention social change as the real change that is needed and the real need for exploitation. For the record, Jesus wants good deeds when no one is looking.
Posted by:BRDecember 10, 2007 1:09:57 PMRespond ^
I have noticed that when a person works on raising their consciousness, they lose the desire to watch TV, except for maybe educational purposes. From a higher perspective, the many attempts to manipulate our minds & emotions is at first irritating, then funny, and finally useless. If more people tried to raise their consciousness, poverty would cease to exist and we wouldn't have to exploit people for the sake of "entertainment".
Posted by:ChristianDecember 10, 2007 1:18:28 PMRespond ^
The only complaint I have ever had with this show is the fact that with a more expensive home, furnishings and car, come higher upkeep costs such as insurance, taxes and maintenance. It is irresponsible of the show to give the families so much that they cannot maintain it. Unless the show is prepared to also grant high-paying jobs to go along with the expensive makeovers, then they should rein in the excess.
Posted by:GinaDecember 10, 2007 1:33:35 PMRespond ^
I think most network television is insane, the only way their going to show a woman naked is after she's been raped and murdered and up on a autopsy table on CSI.Most of their shows prey on the suburban, "keeping up with the Jones's"motif. Extreme Makeover is no different. All that horrible junk isnt going to change their life. Most of the volunteer makeovers around here are for veterans whom got their legs blown off in Iraq or blinded and are now "Hero's" whom unfortunately the VA wont take care of adequately. These acts are a nice band-aid on the terrible social and economic injustices of American society.
Posted by:FranklinDecember 10, 2007 5:48:43 PMRespond ^
It sucks that humanity & charity are exploited for the allure of flashing lights. Its as if even the spirit of generosity can be parlayed into a vehicle to gain power & ratings. Welcome to America....
Posted by:Erin Nicole BarksdaleDecember 11, 2007 5:59:55 AMRespond ^
Arlo Guthrie talked about that "last guy." (The following is from 'The Pause of Mr. Clause,' by Arlo. "But think of the last guy. For one minute, think of the last guy. Nobody's got it worse than that guy. Nobody in the whole world. That guy...he's so alone in the world that he doesn't even have a street to lay in for a truck to run him over. He's out there with nothin'. Nothin's happenin' for that cat." ------------------ Ty found that guy. Every week. And it gets worse and worse. At least each of us can say, "I'm glad I'm not as bad off as that guy." It's what makes America great.
Posted by:phat shantzDecember 11, 2007 10:49:28 PMRespond ^
This article is spot-on with its calling out of commercial excess. A poor family needs a home? Pour them a foundation and basement, put a new 1200 square foot modular home on it, throw in some vinyl flooring and carpet and let them be happy. Don't bludgeon them to death with excess they don't want and don't need.
Posted by:JimboDecember 12, 2007 6:27:54 AMRespond ^
There's a cure for what ails you my dear. TURN OFF THE BOX
Posted by:Dixie LeeDecember 12, 2007 9:33:32 AMRespond ^
The problem with this show is NOT that they give away a bunch of stuff - that's great. The problem is that they coule be sooooooo much more helpful. Basically they shower people with a bunch of materialistic junk. Ty Pennington is a swine. There's no question he's totally whacked on drugs - that's the only way it's possible for him to act so utterly horribly and insultingly to these people.
Posted by:NwekkerDecember 12, 2007 10:49:09 AMRespond ^
Boy you must have nothing to do. Wasting all your time writing this article. Here is a clue "It's a TV show" If it bothers you shut it off stop whining about it or going on and on about how it makes you feel. I don't care how you feel LOL
Posted by:JeffDecember 12, 2007 12:44:16 PMRespond ^
Stop whining and move to Europe if it is sooo bad here. And yes our soldiers are Heros no need for the quotes around the word. What good have you ever done for the country or anyone for that fact?
Posted by:JeffDecember 12, 2007 12:51:18 PMRespond ^
And after the tv cameras are gone who pays the property taxes on these huge square footage homes year after year? Or do they get them high paying jobs too?
Posted by:EdwardDecember 12, 2007 1:57:25 PMRespond ^
Some people certainly want more corporate attention and public back slapping than others. But enough about Jesse Jackson and the Clixons.
Posted by:QUESTION HILLARY tmDecember 12, 2007 7:20:22 PMRespond ^
The kind of loons that find inherent fault in this mild entertainment program IS the same kind of people that can't find a decent heterosexual date for any Friday night. You know. Liberals. Next!
Posted by:QUESTION HILLARY tmDecember 12, 2007 7:25:49 PMRespond ^
It seems to me a symptom of a larger ailment that we look to sensational TV charity to palliate that wretched gut feeling that our grand society (usa, usa, usa we're the greatest), not only does not care for less fortunate, but actively refuses to come to terms with social problems in anything like an effective manner. We can do better.
Posted by:3rd-ChimpDecember 12, 2007 8:20:07 PMRespond ^
It seems to me a symptom of a larger ailment that we look to sensational TV charity to palliate that wretched gut feeling that our grand society (usa, usa, usa we're the greatest), not only does not care for those less fortunate, but actively refuses to come to terms with social problems in anything like an effective manner. We can do better.
Posted by:3rd-ChimpDecember 12, 2007 8:21:49 PMRespond ^
This show makes me so depressed that I can't catch a break and have all those goodies given to me for no reason. I get so depressed, I tell you, if I could wake up dead tomorrow I would be the happiest SOB alive!
Posted by:raymondDecember 13, 2007 8:01:44 PMRespond ^
I was brought up to believe that, when it comes to giving to those less fortunate than yourself, your right hand should not know what your left hand is doing. It is not about you at all: it is about other people. I don't watch TV, like many of the MJ readers commenting on this piece; but to judge from the descriptions of it I have come across here here, I'd say that Mr Pennington is providing what might be called a kind of one-handed viewing, if you get my drift: emotional pornography. Real charity goes on without anyone knowing but the giver.
Posted by:ChrysippusDecember 14, 2007 2:16:52 PMRespond ^
Extreme Makeover just came to our town(Rice Va) and we are all so glad to be rid of the whole bunch. I was suckered into being the masonry contractor for the house without realizing the extent of the work involved. Let me tell you, THE WHOLE SHOW IS A COMPLETE JOKE, the "design team" and Ty in particular did absolutely nothing all week but get drunk in our local bars,no kidding! All of us volunteers busted our tails for long hours with not so much as a thank you for making ABC millions! Never again.
Posted by:MatthewDecember 14, 2007 3:18:48 PMRespond ^
That's a really interesting comment, Matthew of Rice, VA. All of the local, donated labor has one purpose: to support the commercial efforts of ABC and its sponsors. Sears and all the other corporations "give" generously, but it's all a tax write off — a an advertising expense. Ty and his staff "give" because it furthers their TV careers.
Posted by:ron in PhillyDecember 16, 2007 8:13:17 AMRespond ^
My only disagreement with your article is that you make it sound as though this is something new. Now I'm only 38 myself and by all rights have no reason to remember this first hand... but back in the day there was a TV show called "Queen For A Day". You should Google it and see where exploitative television got its start. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_for_a_Day
Posted by:Jordan LundDecember 17, 2007 4:40:53 PMRespond ^
what a pointless, futile and trivial article. Who ever believed that 'reality' tv was anything but staged? And what about all those mixed and conflicted feelings on the part of the writer... sad... Man you need to go out more often. In fact here's a tip: the red button on the top of the remote is the off switch, it will make thoses images on the tv screen disapear, then you will be free. Go out, get some fresh air and find yourself a proper article subject.
Posted by:nexlDecember 17, 2007 7:45:32 PMRespond ^
Only in America could misery be turned into a [deleted]ing game show
Posted by:Tora3December 17, 2007 8:02:05 PMRespond ^
what gets me about the whole thing is the EXCESS. they could afford to build 20 modest homes for the price of 1 of their typical "extreme" homes. convincing people that they are better off with professionally decorated homes with big porches and a bathroom for every inhabitant only further perpetuates our cultures attachment to and desire for STUFF. here's a question: what happens to the new homes they build in the middle of a poor neighborhood? did anyone ever think about the actual value of the surrounding homes and properties in the neighborhood they're building in? and how quality really is a home built in 7 days? some people have commented on the fact that they are criticizing this show but not doing anything themselves. we each have the ability to do something to help others and it's not going to be the "extreme" gestures that change the world, it's going to be many small ones. so keep taking a stand on things that are important to you and you will be doing something.
Posted by:amandaDecember 21, 2007 9:43:26 PMRespond ^
Ok then why don't we all sell our houses and move out in the wild and live in tents. And better yet why not just be plain sad and unhappy like John here wants everyone to be. I enjoy watching Ty be a goof and make nice houses for unfortunate people. The point is for them to make a house that the people never had or most of us never will have. That is why its called Extreme. But hey, lets all be down and unfortunate and lets wish everyone else all misfortune in the wold. The website has something against the Extreme Makeover and Ty Pennington, it would not matter if they donated a billion dollars to charity or starving people in africa, it would still be wrong and Ty would be the bad person. Just my 2 cents.
Posted by:MattDecember 26, 2007 2:15:46 PMRespond ^
Not a month ago I got into a huge huge argument about this show, myself very much taking the position the author here presents.This article affirms my distrust and hesitation to blind adulation. Cool.
Posted by:Joe KayJanuary 16, 2008 1:54:17 PMRespond ^
You complain too much! The commercial success of this show and one like Oprah's big give is built around the notion that we'd all like to be better at giving. We shop at Sears, Home Depot and the places that support these shows and, in turn support this remarkably grand generousity. You said yourself that you sit on your couch eating burritos. You could be out helping. You could build a house for someone. You could be cleaning up sludge for someone in New Orleans. You could even hug an AIDS afflicted baby in Africa. But, instead, you choose to denigrate the efforts of those who do, as you sit and eat your burrito.

As a people, we are involved in our careers, families and workaday lives. The "feel good" programming provides a stark and pleasant contrast to the various and sundry cops-and -forensic-scientists-find-the-bad-guys-committing-heinous-crimes yarn that pervades the air waves. Such programming is actually somewhat uplifting and, if anything, inspires all of us workaday slobs to look at the world and at our fellow men as people with good and open hearts. And you continue to eat your burrito.
Posted by:David UmlaufApril 12, 2008 6:30:59 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS