MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Tonto's Curse

Charles Eastman and Senator Henry Dawes.

Arts: HBO's Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee is all smoke, no fire, and even a Native American-produced documentary fails to bring that history to life. What is it about the bad blood between the United States and Native Americans that makes for bad films?

May 30, 2007


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee
HBO Films. 212 minutes.

Exterminate Them: The California Story
Eyapaha Institute. 82 minutes.

Read Dee Brown's Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and you will feel palpably that your ancestors brutally murdered Indians so you could live on that happy little plot of land where you sit reading. Don't expect it to feel good. In fact, it feels so bad that Americans have repressed, suppressed, and finessed the truth about our nation's founding for more than 200 years. It's hard to retrieve a truth so manhandled even when you want to: Native American History Month, which is this May, comes and goes each year with none of the educational earnestness of Black History Month.

When it comes to making movies about Native Americans, even solid filmmakers can look like drama teachers putting on a Thanksgiving play. HBO has fallen into this cultural trap with director Yves Simoneau's eponymous docudrama based on Dee Brown's book, which premiered May 27. The film focuses on the struggles of the Sioux, from the Oglala destruction of General Custer's forces at Little Big Horn to the massacre of 300 unarmed Lakota at Wounded Knee—the butchery that effectively ended Native American resistance.

Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee introduces a range of characters, unsettling the simple innocent/guilty pairing that often stands in for intelligent discussion of Native American history. Senator Henry Dawes's character appears genuine in his desire to "civilize" and protect the Indians—insofar as his efforts do not hinder whites' settlement of the land. The Sioux protagonist, Dr. Charles Eastman, is initially repelled by his father's belief that "The Earth belongs to the white man; there is no future outside his world." But the white world treats Eastman well, lavishing him with scholarships and awards, and he becomes the native spokesman for Senator Dawes' plan to set the nomadic Sioux up as small farmers. But when Eastman takes his Harvard medical training back to the Sioux reservation, he has second thoughts. He writes to Dawes, "Measles, influenza, and whooping cough have ascended from hell all at once…Of equal consequence is the epidemic of hopelessness that has overtaken the reservation." Eastman ultimately rebels against Dawes's push for assimilation at the cost of his newfound identity as an assimilated Indian, but he remains happily married to a white woman who supports the native cause.

Even with these attempts at complexity, the film feels a lot like an after-school special. Its characters are forced to serve as archetypes, and their dialogue does double duty as an aphoristic history of the United States' conquest of the Indians. For example, Eastman concludes that the reservation Indians' willingness to "bear the wretched taste of cod liver oil for the ounce of spirits contained in the bottle is to me the whole of their experience in a nutshell." His second thoughts about assimilating take the form of a nightmare in which he is split in half by a train which is simultaneously that which carried him to a white-run Indian school and the railroad the American government wants to build across Eastman's tribe's lands.


As a counterpoint to HBO's mainstream tip of the hat to Native American History Month, Mother Jones turned to a documentary by the Sioux actor Floyd Red Crow Westerman, made to create a forum for Native American elders and historians to recount their tribes' own histories. Westerman—who played Ten Bears in Dances with Wolves and has portrayed Native American characters in Walker, Texas Ranger; The X Files, and Murder, She Wrote—objects to the "gross misuse of history" in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, and particularly to the film's suggestion that Eastman disavowed his Sioux identity. Westerman's film, Exterminate Them: The California Story, which premiered at the San Francisco American Indian Film Festival last year, will serve as the pilot episode of a 6-part series called America's War on Indian Nations.

As the title suggests, Exterminate Them offers harsher medicine than Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. In the opening moments of the film, Westerman compares the Indian Wars to the Holocaust and the reservations to concentration camps. Westerman's similes aren't so far off. After all, Peter Burnett, the first governor of California, declared, "[A] war of extermination will continue to be waged between the two races until the Indian race becomes extinct." California's missions served as the prototype for the United States' reservations, which were first proposed in Congress two years after Burnett led California into statehood. Westerman's documentary features historian David Stannard's deduction that mission Indians received a daily diet of some 600 calories a day—about what Jews in concentration camps were receiving at the end of World War II.

But the view of the United States' treatment of Native Americans as a minor infraction best forgotten is so powerful that Westerman's account cannot escape the air of melodrama that clings to claims of Native American victimization and to all comparisons with the Holocaust. Westerman may have damaged his own credibility by playing stereotypical Native American roles, at one point even shilling for "Lakota" brand pain reliever in full Sioux regalia. But his project faces the nearly impossible challenge of introducing genocide into the national debate in a nation that has never acknowledged its crimes. Doing so is no small matter: Germany's formal recognition of the Holocaust triggered several generations of national shame. And even with that contrition, few Germans have contributed to the collection of superb films about the Holocaust that have lodged that slaughter in our minds as reality rather than exaggeration.

It may simply be too late for the United States to initiate an intelligent and genuine national conversation about the Indian Wars. Facts and characters have been lost to history, leaving only the archetypes of stoic, formal-seeming Native Americans and earnest-but-hardnosed U.S. government and military men to populate our imaginings of history. Denial has become second nature, but like a repressed personal tragedy, it gnaws at us. The result is bad movies that we feel compelled to continue making and watching.

Cameron Scott is a senior online fellow at Mother Jones.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Cameron, I've not seen the HBO piece yet, but have heard and read much about how it was just another 'entertainment' venture of fabrication pawned off on the uneducated. I think that until our nation admits to it's revisionist history and continued manifest destiny policies, i.e. Iraq, nothing will ever change. Our leaders act to ensure to the rest of the world that we have the biggest penis and that we act empirically as the only way for the way; savior nation we are to downtrodden and unfortunate. Please! Spare me! If we can't acknowledge the genocide perpetrated upon the many tribes people of long ago, it's no wonder we can't commit ourselves as a nation to understanding what our government continues to do to others around the world in our name. Until we realize that, as a wise Pueblo man once told me, that 'we all come from the same five-fingered clan' don't expect anything to change.
Posted by:Ray IIMay 30, 2007 6:39:52 PMRespond ^
Mr. Scott, Have you seen TNT's "Into The West?" I use this as a tool in my classroom. I teach in a school with a 75% Native population in Bayfield, WI. In all fairness, what film really captures the WW II Holocaust from every perspective? I agree that the film industry can do better. If you have not checked out "Into The West," please do. Jeff Kriner jeffkriner@bayfield.k12.wi.us
Posted by:Jeff KrinerMay 31, 2007 7:34:24 AMRespond ^
What is it in the scripting of dialogue involving an Indian that it is so stiff and boring? I can't believe that they spoke or speak like that.
Posted by:Abe DubnoMay 31, 2007 10:18:42 AMRespond ^
Mr. Kriner...you use 'Into the West' in your class? You do know that the DVD version of that program was an edited version and not the same as was presented when TNT originally aired the program. That was one reason I returned my copy I'd gotten as a gift before I even opened it! Why do we have to sanitize history in order for it to be taught in the classroom? That's what's wrong with our nation now...no one has the courage to tell it like it is! Are there some good things that are presented in both 'Into the West' and 'Bury My Heart...' sure, but why is that no one wants to address the fact that genocide was attempted right here in America? I hope that your students and yourself have meaningful discussions that go WAY beyond what is on the screen.
Posted by:Ray IIMay 31, 2007 11:25:51 AMRespond ^
Hey Jeff - check out Night and Fog (Nuit et brouillard), Alain Resnais' masterpiece on the Holocaust. It succeeds so spectacularly as a film precicely because it is made with the knowlege of its inherent limitatons. Also, you might not wanna put your email address out there like that. Spammers have spiders out there looking for emaill addresses, try something like: janesmith[at]domain[dot]com
Posted by:Rocky IVMay 31, 2007 2:39:49 PMRespond ^
“It may simply be too late for the United States to initiate an intelligent and genuine national conversation about the Indian Wars.” Who is the “United States?” I have been engaged in conversations about history (and specifically about American genocidal practices the so called“ Indian Wars”) since I was five years old. Because such issues inform our daily existence, and the unfolding lives of our children.They are unavoidable. Despite enormous expenditures of resources ect... Indians are still here “Too late”? for whom? I obviously agree that “Denial has become second nature, but like a repressed personal tragedy, it gnaws at us. The result is..” the Native youth found hanging from a tree, the Indian girl that is raped by a white man. Have you seen the amnesty international report? Have you talked to your neighbors? Have you engaged in the national conversation?
Posted by:jenna elliottMay 31, 2007 8:28:34 PMRespond ^
I found the movie to be dry too. It still angered me greatly, but it was pretty soft on its viewpoint of US troop involvement in the actual massacre. The troops had no right to even be where they were, they were admittedly invading another country over a dance! The sad part about America's neglect to face its shameful past is it has perpetuated into the present. Here in Alaska the state legislators, US Senators (Ted Stevens), etc. have been stating that there are no native people here at all. I am sure that if they had their way they would be correct. America still wouldn't look at the problem of the continuing, and subtler, genocide in this country.
Posted by:Edward AlexanderJune 1, 2007 2:36:00 AMRespond ^
Great it wasn't. Your arrogant critic less than helpful.
Posted by:Barie McCurryJune 1, 2007 12:25:26 PMRespond ^
I watched the entire film when it aired on HBO on the 27th. I had been eagerly awaiting it, since I had read Dee Brown's book 30 yrs ago as an anthropology student and thought it brilliant. I was sorely disappointed by the film. I thought HBO could have done much better - it *was* rather Hollywoodized - and the script was substandard. (I referred to one early character as "Major Exposition" to my friend watching it w/ me.) Too much melodrama and not enough stark horror and racism. This from the network that brought us The Sopranos, Deadwood and Rome?! Funny, that. Who were they afraid of offending?
Posted by:MargaretJune 1, 2007 12:32:11 PMRespond ^
People think it's horrible what Hitler did, but okay for what we have done, are doing, and will continue to do.
Posted by:martaJune 1, 2007 12:32:41 PMRespond ^
Something is wrong with your email page and print page link; both come up with error? Check that your site isn't being block by outside forces.
Posted by:darkbird18@yahoo.comJune 1, 2007 1:39:09 PMRespond ^
We can't stop apologizing for slavery while the Civil War was over in 1865, yet we never apologize for slaughters that continued past 1890? It insane!
Posted by:brenda doredantJune 1, 2007 2:19:03 PMRespond ^
The HBO version of Bury My Heart...uses the fictional character of Eastwood (he's not in the book). Apparently this was done as art-form "literary license" to portray certain characterizations. To say that Eastman's "two world"s conflict" was unrealistic is itself most unrealistic. My own mother, born on the Pine Ridge reservation and conveniently "shut aside" in Indian boarding schools (ie- learning how to wait tables and stand in line at the cafeteria) and who later married a caucasian man was so conflicted all of her life. If anything, the HBO movie did not show the horror of women and children murdered as in a human hunting season nearly enough. There was a deafening silence after the last shot stilled the air that was not captured even slightly in the movie.
Posted by:Max LivingstonJune 1, 2007 3:32:42 PMRespond ^
I haven't seen the special. I have read and reread Brown's book over the course of the last 20 years. I have additionally read everything else I have time to read about the Native American holocaust. As a mixed blood person, I feel that I am able to see, at least a little bit, of both sides, and feel strongly that it is the poverty of spirit of the colonizers that accounts for these inadequate attempts at "telling the story." Even Native peoples cannot tell the story because it is too horrific for the ancestors of the colonizers to accept. Until every non-Native who owns land and does not have an heir leaves her/his land to the original people of that area so that some degree of compromise can be made, there will never be peace. Eventually, in this way, there might be some kind of compromise made as we cannot go back and reconstruct history. When Locke told everyone that if the land is not "used" in the European conception of the term, it belongs to s/he who will "use" it, the battle was lost. Those who view the earth as property will eventually "lose", but the loss to the Native peoples who could not conceive of such an idea, and who have been, incidentally forced to use it anyway, is immeasurable. Until everyone understands this is about land, the earth, not some kind of Eurocentric "theory," nothing can change. I was so hoping that someone would be able to tell the story that Brown did so well. It is disheartening to learn that did not happen.
Posted by:Jeanne NorthropJune 1, 2007 5:55:06 PMRespond ^
I saw Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee; it is more the story of Charles Eastman than Dee Brown's book by the same name. The movie, I believe, may be a starting place for many. Your article is very informative. Thank you.
Posted by:Marie MoodyJune 1, 2007 6:35:16 PMRespond ^
I skipped this movie once I read an interview with the producer or director who justified the "fictionalization" of Charles Eastman's story on the grounds that the film was "entertainment" and that a white audience needed "someone to identify with." (Gee, how about Custer? Seems to me he was the white American prototype ... Oh, right, he's about as entertaining as Hitler in a holocaust film. Oh well ... ) The sad fact is, there are few Euro-American heroes in the story of the settlement of the Americas. From the enslavement of the Taino by Columbus, to the cholera-infested blankets given to Six Nations people at a parley, to the pennies-on-the-dollar settlements of land claims and mineral rights down to the present day, we've been the bad guys. And we seem to have no capacity, as a nation, for admitting we have done something awful, we've been wrong and brutal and unjust. Iraq, Vietnam, Wounded Knee, the slave trade--same old same old. As for the absence of films that are both "entertaining" and capable of dealing honestly with the interaction between the original inhabitants of the Americas and the colonizers, I suggest taking a look at Thunderheart, which gets an awful lot of the issues of the past and present right, and has Val Kilmer, Sam Shepard, and Graham Greene giving memorable performances. Both Little Big Man and Dances with Wolves are well-told stories that grapple with serious issues and are respectful of the history. I also found the discussion of Floyd Westerman's role in TV commercials unnecessarily disparaging. Westerman is an actor. That's how he makes his living. His film may or may not be flawed, but not because he appeared in a TV commercial. I thought Jeanne N.'s suggestion of bequeathing land to native peoples was good. Yes, that might make some amends.
Posted by:Kathleen A. KellyJune 1, 2007 10:03:36 PMRespond ^
I read Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee many years ago So I was feeling displacement when I saw the movie which sort of told a story but not the one I had read. I might be mixing Black Elk Speaks into this but I think 1st person narrative of a real person trumps fiction. In summer of 92 I went to Wounded Knee to attend a Pow Wow Pine Ridge Res. I walked the ground where much of the killing was done. I could feel the ground which seemed to be giving me energy that travelled right up my legs. I was a combat vet and that's who I hung out with along with their families. There were missionaries at the res but they would'nt be seen at a PowWow and the white people I met in Rapid City were wearing their racist hatred openly in a way I'd not seen since my childhood in the South. Very disturbing. So there seemed little real his-her-story to be gained and one would have to put that hatred into a context as it exists today as real as it was back then. If it did it would do alot to educate while telling a good story.
Posted by:Anthony Martin DambrosiJune 2, 2007 12:01:59 AMRespond ^
Indian Wars? Indian Wars? In Europe it was called the 'Jewish Problem', which is like wolves discussing the 'Sheep Problem'
Posted by:lindaJune 2, 2007 2:16:46 AMRespond ^
Something very similar is happening here in Canada. It does not matter how much 'proof' of government genocidal policy is brought forward. No one in the Canadian government will accept responsibilty. Until they do, they won't have to apologize. A simple, We're sorry, would have helped. Now, because of the denial, that just won't do. Action is the only way left to right these wrong's of the past because these wrong's are still starving people in the present. DF
Posted by:Donna FurnivalJune 2, 2007 7:20:58 AMRespond ^
I didn't read BMHAWK until a little over 10 years ago, late in my life. I now know at least one source of American fact, where Adolph Hitler may have gotten his Kamph for how to conduct his affairs related to Jews. We come from reprehensible and disgusting forefathers and settlers, period. And we still haven't honorably met any of our treaties with the Natives here, our brothers and sisters. No wonder we have "issues" in our families.
Posted by:Robert StevensJune 2, 2007 12:13:37 PMRespond ^
Against my better judgment I went ahead and viewed HBO's film in the hope that it would speak more to the truth of the genocidal actions of the white man on those who have what they want. It was again a total disappointment. The dialogue of the Indians in this film was so stilted, and so English.How stupid can you be to think they would speak this way. The public is purposly fed bits and pieces of historical facts,or history rearranging while leaving out greater portions of truth, in effect revising the story for their own diabolical reasons. Brainwash the public. This nation will never admit to it's false history and will forever continue to control via it's manifest destiny policies. To this day the public does not see anything wrong with the fact the reservations still exist in locations chosen by the government, and not the people who live in them. I do not doubt that in the future, even the native hispanic people who have lived in this country over 12 generations will likely end up the same way. They can easily be rounded up with recent illegal immigrants. This cannot be taken lightly by many that could be affected. As I see it this nation lacks the understanding of what the government has done in the past, and what it continues to do in the present in other parts of the world. Nothing has changed. How this country started out is an indication of how it has continued with full compliance of badly misinformed and disinterested public.
Posted by:LanicaJune 2, 2007 12:57:07 PMRespond ^
Dee Brown was a friend and mentor to me when I was a student at the University of Illinois. Several years later, I sent him the first draft of a play Id written about a historical character; it was the first time I'd dramatized history instead of basing my writing on primary research, and as a journalsit that made me a bit queasy. His response -- characteristically generous and reassuring -- pointed out that dramatizing historical figures can be an honorable and effective way to serve history, and it has a tradition of its own going back to Sir Walter Scott. Nobody can speak for Dee Brown, of course, but I found the HBO film moving at times and the comment I've cited suggests Dee would have appreciated the need to dramatize and adapt. Certainly the HBO film has little in common with the book "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" other than the title. And perhaps that's because the book is such a masterpiece of historical writing that it defies adaptation. To a generation raised on TV westerns, it restored the true eloquence of Native American leaders like Chief Joseph by quoting their own words. To readers grappling with an American war machine that seemed out of control of the citizenry, it provided an electrifying warning about just how wrong things can go. And to a nation accustomed to the myths of manifest destiny, it revealed the ugly and awful historical truths behind the propaganda. If you read "Bury My Heart" years ago, do yourself a favor -- read the very end again. You'll see the final words provide far more emotional punch than anything Hollywood could imagine. And if you are troubled by the HBO version of "Bury My Heart," console yourself with the knowledge that all of the attendant publicity and controversy will only bring a new generation of readers to this remarkable and powerful book, and bring old readers back again.
Posted by:WmBJune 2, 2007 10:56:03 PMRespond ^
I think that the bad blood is easy to explain. This country cannot face what it did because we are still doing it. Maybe not in the same way but we are still justifing stealing resources from others all over the world. If we acknowledge it then we have to stop. Iraq and the hatred toward Chavez are just two more examples. No one says it anymore but manifest destiny is alive and well and we are in denial.
Posted by:jwirrJune 3, 2007 6:25:23 PMRespond ^
Sad to say, but the over all temper of "Bury My Heart..." will probably be the norm from here out. I was in for a surprise when I moved to New England from Hawaii/West Coast. The temperament out there was that we were trying to hang on to what survived, and to resurrect what had been lost. Out here in Mass/Rhode Island, assimilation worked, as an after thought to genocide. Most of our "tribal" pow-wows out here are really just church socials. The subtle, but important difference was that both were perpetuated by the colonial ENGLISH, not Americans. And any lingering idea of guilt or responsibility have been ameliorated by permission to build Casinos. So while drinking, gambling, smoking tobacco (or other herbs) may be deemed "immoral" to the entrenched liberal left typified by the Harvard set, it's O.K. for us to partake. Cultural differences, no doubt. Just look how slow Brown University is to responding to Pres. Ruth Simmons challenge to reparations to descendants of slaves. I have a feeling that any language to strike the word "Plantation" from official documents in Rhode Island will meet as much resistance as dumping the Stars and Bars from Southern flags.
Posted by:KnowablesavageJune 4, 2007 4:42:11 PMRespond ^
Heritage is one thing, confort is another. We know the history. It is time to pursue progress for every one equaly including our american indians. Dr.Q
Posted by:Dr.QJune 12, 2007 2:44:28 PMRespond ^
We often forget that we the europeans and our ancestor were guests in this great land. Our cruelty selfishness lead us to conquered an entire continent and whipped out entire nations. We should be ashamed of our ancestors. I don't think American can actually handle knowing the truth of what happened in the west nor can the Canadians either. It's a history of selfishness, cruelty and genocide. Glossed over by an nice clean and polished venere of artistic license. This movie is not much about aboriginal history. It's just a watered down attempt at telling some history. We really need to sitdown and ask ourselves some deep questions about how we got here and where all the people went who were here before us. I live on aboriginal land and so does every person in the americas. It's time to start atleast recognizing that fact.
Posted by:AndrewJune 13, 2007 8:36:37 PMRespond ^
Mr. Scott's review of the Westerman film, "Exterminate Them," makes me not want to see it, however laudable the content and its treatment. Films detailing extreme cruelty and injustice give me agita. Sorry Mr. Westerman. I do take exception to the "air of melodrama" and following remarks, though. Mr. Scott is perhaps missing an important point. Unlike injustices perpetrated on other segments of society, which we have at least acknowledged and attempted to address, if not erase, the US continues to abuse the Natives. We still have the incompetencies of the BIA and the rapaciousness of the Interior. Many perfectly legal treaties are still honored in the breach. If we were in the European Union their Human Rights tribunal would have smacked the US down years ago. Admittedly, many do find the concept of corporate punishment for the misdeeds of forbears a troubling concept. The fact that we continue to allow such abuses in the bureaux, indeed boardrooms, of America is what makes us guilty here and now.
Posted by:Peter RamseyJune 18, 2007 12:27:50 PMRespond ^
I have not seen the HBO movie, and from the comments, am glad I missed it. Dee Brown's book is as clear in my mind as when I read it years ago. No revision there. It is difficult to see how the cultures, western american and native american, as a whole resolve what has happened in the past, and continues to happen. Although there are examples of cultural acceptance. Unfortunately, most Western culture views are probably derived from Hollywood, which makes the history palpable for viewing pleasure, eat more popcorn, drink more pop. A visit to a rez, where significant progress has been made in preserving culture and teaching children, is a better experience. Yes, there are western customs, casinos, sales of other things on the rez but that certainly helps with cultural preservation and living in the western world.
Posted by:mike adamsJune 19, 2007 2:04:21 PMRespond ^
What's all this talk about HOW the movie was made? Isn't the important issue THAT IT WAS MADE? Just because they didn't tell the story exactly like YOU think it should be told... aren't you doing what the government did--in a smaller way? Telling someone HOW to tell their story? How about let's all just 'live and let live'... They told the story --END OF DISCUSSION
Posted by:ShelleyAugust 5, 2007 2:05:12 PMRespond ^
You did not talk about Dances with Wolves. One of the best films ever made about Native Americans and their all too true struggles against what us whites have done to them. You should also have mentioned Son of the Morning Star, as Native Americans once call George Custer. As you see, this was a made-for-tv movie based on detailed accounts of both side of Custer's Last Stand. I am one white man who says we have slighted our Native Americans far too long and it's time we recognize them. We have done far worse to our Native American brothers than we have done to our Black citizens and I still don't understand why it is so wrong to say black or white. Perhaps we shouldn't think at all of color in anything and then only when it relates to specific indemic diseases. I say this, as I may be white, but I am proud to say that I am about 1% or 2% Black and Native American.
Posted by:Robert RichardsSeptember 24, 2007 7:28:51 PMRespond ^
Maybe I missed something. I thought this movie was really good and showed it to my students. (with some mild editing) I was happy to find a movie on Native American struggles worth showing and my students loved it. What did I overlook?
Posted by:Kdub34November 9, 2007 11:44:32 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS