Brett Brownell

Brett Brownell

Multimedia Producer

Brett Brownell is the Multimedia Producer at Mother Jones and has visited all 50 states. He also helped launch MSNBC's Up with Chris Hayes as a video and web producer, served as new media director for the employee rights organization Workplace Fairness, and founded the annual global photography event Worldwide Moment in 2007. He is a graduate of the University of Southern California's School of Cinema-T.V. and grew up in Arlington, Texas.

Get my RSS |

HBO's "The Case Against 8": An Intimate Look at One of Gay Marriage's Greatest Victories

| Fri Jun. 20, 2014 6:00 AM EDT

On June 29, 2013, I attended Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier's wedding at San Francisco's City Hall and filmed the video above.

It was an especially jubilant occasion that marked the end of a long legal battle. Earlier that week, they won their Supreme Court case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, on a 5-4 decision. The ruling officially overturned Proposition 8—an earlier ballot initiative that nullified a 2008 ruling from California's highest court legalizing gay marriage—effectively making gay marriage legal again in the state. Perry and Stier wasted no time, and became the first same sex couple married under California's new legal regime.

All of us in attendance that day, from media, to family, to other spouses-in-waiting, were aware of the historical significance of Perry and Stier's nuptials. But we hadn't witnessed the behind-the-scenes story that led to their marriage. Now with HBO's new documentary The Case Against 8, which premieres Monday night, we get an exclusive look at the emotion and effort that took their case all the way the Supreme Court.

The Case Against 8's story begins with election night in 2008. While much of the country was celebrating Barack Obama's victory, gay marriage supporters were shocked and saddened by the election results coming out of California, where voters had approved Prop 8. As Ben Cotner, a co-director of the documentary, told Mother Jones, "none of us thought it would pass." He describes that night as "a wake up call to gay people that we weren't doing enough."

Soon after the ballot initiative passed, Cotner and co-director Ryan White got in touch with the two marquee attorneys who would lead the legal challenge to invalidate Prop 8—the very-odd-couple of Ted Olson and David Boies. In 2000, Olson and Boies squared off against each other at the Supreme Court as lawyers representing George W. Bush and Al Gore, respectively, in the presidential election-defining Bush v. Gore case. In The Case Against 8, we see them united once again, but now as allies for a progressive cause.

From the beginning of the film, we're reminded how surprising it was for Olson to emerge as a full throated supporter of gay marriage. After securing the White House for George Bush, Olson served as the socially conservative administration's Solicitor General. For decades, spanning from his time as an assistant attorney general under Reagan to his 2009 oral arguments on behalf of Citizen's United in the Supreme Court case that lifted key limits on corporate campaign spending, Olson had amassed a resume that made him one of the Right's leading legal lights. Kristina Schake, an official at the non-profit that spearheaded the challenge to Prop. 8, puts it simply, describing Olson as "the most prominent conservative lawyer in America."

image: case against 8
Hollingsworth v. Perry plaintiffs Kris Perry, Sandy Stier, Paul Katami, and Jeff Zarrillo in "The Case Against 8" Courtesy of AFER/Diana Walker/HBO

"People were worried he was a mole or would sabotage the movement," co-director Ryan White told Mother Jones. But throughout The Case Against 8, Olson is seen tirelessly fighting, both in private and in the courtroom, for gay couples' right to marry, calling marriage itself a "conservative value." White says Olson deserves a lot of credit, noting that "even our own President [Obama] wasn't in favor of gay marriage when our filming began."

Olson and Boies were amenable to letting cameras observe their work, but the decision to allow filming in private meetings ultimately fell to their clients: Kristin Perry, Sandra Stier, Paul Katami, and Jeffrey Zarrillo—the gay couples who were the battle's public faces. Opening their private lives to the documentarians for what would surely become a stressful, emotional, and vulnerable period was no easy decision. But the couples decided to allow access because they believed in transparency and the educational value of the case.

Early in The Case Against 8, there's a scene showing a grueling prep session between Perry, Stier, and their lawyers. Attorney Sarah Piepmeier is playing the role of an opposing lawyer, preparing Stier for her first appearance on the stand. Piepmeier asks a series of questions and presents research intended to discredit Perry and make her intentions for the case appear entirely selfish. Following an uncomfortable few minutes, Piepmeier hands Stier a printout of her Facebook page, and says, "Your description for yourself was: 'Middle-aged mom with delusions of grandeur.'" Stier replies sheepishly, "Yes," to which Piepmeier says, "Ok, I have no further questions." Stier explodes with embarrassment and laughter and Perry adds, "That is so mean! What the hell?!" It's clear that when the real trial begins, these moments of levity and safety will vanish.

Kristin Perry has four sons who are featured throughout the film as important sources of inspiration for the couple. "You don't always take the time to listen to your moms," said co-director White, "but to hear them talk about it on the stand...they were in tears."

To win, the plaintiffs had to expose, explain, and describe their feelings for one another and for their families, which is not always easy to do in private, much less before a court and all the world. These scenes make The Case Against 8 not only an intimate look at the legal groundwork that led to Hollingsworth v. Perry, but also an honest, riveting account of love—and a recognition of how far this fight has come.

The Case Against 8 premieres Monday June 23 on HBO. Watch the trailer:

Advertise on MotherJones.com

60 Years Ago the Supreme Court Told Schools to Desegregate. Here's How Fast We're Backsliding.

| Sat May 17, 2014 9:12 AM EDT
A 1973 Charlotte, N.C., first grade class that was integrated through a school busing program.

Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in schools was unconstitutional. The changes required by Brown v. Board of Education decision were not immediate, but they were profound and lasting. Today, schools in the South are the least segregated for black students in the nation.

Of course, that doesn't tell the whole story. In honor of the Brown anniversary, UCLA's Civil Rights Project released a report that analyzes the progress of desegregation since 1954. According to the report, starting in the 1980s, schools began to ditch integration efforts and shift focus to universal education standards as a way to level the playing field for students in unequal schools. In 1991, when the Supreme Court ruled that school districts could end their desegregation plans, it put the nail in integration's coffin.

Black students integrating a Clinton, Tennessee, school in 1956 Thomas J. O'Halloran/Library of Congress
In New York state, 65 percent of black students attend schools that are 90 to 100 percent minority, as do 57 percent of Latino students.

Today, the picture of American schools is far different than what the 1954 ruling seemed to portend. The UCLA report notes that Latino students are the most segregated in the country. In major and midsize cities, where housing discrimination historically separated neighborhoods along racial lines, black and Latino students are often almost entirely isolated from white and Asian students—about 12 percent of black and Latino students in major cities have any exposure to white students. Half of the students who attend 91 to 100 percent black and Latino schools (which make up 13 percent of all US public schools) are also in schools that are 90 percent low-income—a phenomenon known as "double segregation." And the Northeast holds the special distinction of having more black children in intensely segregated schools (where school populations are 90 to 100 percent minority) in 2011 than it did in 1968. In New York state, for instance, 65 percent of black students attend schools that are intensely segregated, as do 57 percent of Latino students.

Bused to a white school, New York City children face parent protests in 1965. Dick DeMarsico/Library of Congress

Even in the South, where Brown made such a profound difference, school integration is being rolled back. The chart below shows the percentage of black students attending majority white schools in the South over the last 60 years. You can see the progress made after Brown—and how rapidly it's dissolving.

This Video of Michael Sam and His Boyfriend Finding Out He Has Been Drafted Is Amazing

| Sat May 10, 2014 9:11 PM EDT

Earlier today, Michael Sam received a really great phone call. He had become the first openly-gay player to be drafted in NFL history. Cameras were present as he and his boyfriend found out the news together. Watch them share a kiss and beautiful embrace as they learn of the historic decision by the St. Louis Rams:

 

Tue Apr. 15, 2014 6:00 AM EDT
Fri Apr. 11, 2014 6:00 AM EDT
Wed Aug. 28, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Thu Aug. 22, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Tue Jul. 9, 2013 2:38 PM EDT
Fri Jun. 28, 2013 10:18 PM EDT
Mon Apr. 29, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Fri Mar. 15, 2013 8:19 PM EDT
Thu Mar. 14, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Mon Feb. 4, 2013 7:06 AM EST
Tue Nov. 20, 2012 7:03 AM EST