David Corn

David Corn

Washington Bureau Chief

Corn has broken stories on presidents, politicians, and other Washington players. He's written for numerous publications and is a talk show regular. His best-selling books include Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.

Get my RSS |

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Media Goes Wild Over Hagel Firing But Not Obama's Secret Afghanistan Reversal

| Mon Nov. 24, 2014 12:03 PM EST
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel meets with soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division.

There's little the Washington-centric political-media universe loves more than the story of a fallen star. The defenestration of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has reporters and pundits in a schadenfreude-driven tizzy. Was he fired? Was he in over his head? OMG, look at how the White House is dumping on him, as he departs! Who's passing nasty notes in class about him?

The presumably forced resignation of Hagel is indeed big news. The Obama administration is confronting a host of new national security challenges: ISIS, Ukraine, Ebola. So the guy (or gal) in charge of the Pentagon has to be nimble and able to handle this expanding and shifting to-do list. And Hagel, ever since his underwhelming performance at his confirmation hearing, has not been (at least in public) a confidence-inspiring Cabinet member. So perhaps President Barack Obama can do better—though the elbowing Hagel is receiving on the way out seems poor manners.

Yet here's a useful exercise. Compare the red-hot media reaction to Hagel's bye-bye to the response to the New York Times' eye-popping report that Obama signed a secret order to expand the US military mission in Afghanistan next year. The story about one man—yes, one of the cool kids in DC—is at least an order of magnitude higher on the MediaReax-ometer. Any tidbit from an anonymous source about de-Hagelization gets immediate attention from tweeting journos. But the story about this significant policy shift has prompted mostly a yawn.

In case you missed it—the story was posted online on Friday but appeared in Saturday's dead-trees edition—the Times revealed that Obama, who last May said the United States would have no combat missions in Afghanistan in 2015 (and only train Afghan forces and hunt Al Qaeda "remnants"), had secretly authorized American forces

to carry out missions against the Taliban and other militant groups threatening American troops or the Afghan government, a broader mission than the president described to the public earlier this year, according to several administration, military and congressional officials with knowledge of the decision. The new authorization also allows American jets, bombers and drones to support Afghan troops on combat missions.

Thu Apr. 8, 2010 1:11 PM EDT
Tue Apr. 6, 2010 11:16 AM EDT
Mon Apr. 5, 2010 1:44 PM EDT
Mon Apr. 5, 2010 10:52 AM EDT
Fri Apr. 2, 2010 11:26 AM EDT
Thu Apr. 1, 2010 12:15 PM EDT
Wed Mar. 31, 2010 12:28 PM EDT
Thu Mar. 25, 2010 2:36 PM EDT
Thu Mar. 25, 2010 11:58 AM EDT
Wed Mar. 24, 2010 6:48 PM EDT
Sat Mar. 20, 2010 3:35 PM EDT
Wed Mar. 17, 2010 1:50 PM EDT
Wed Mar. 17, 2010 11:19 AM EDT
Mon Mar. 15, 2010 2:19 PM EDT
Mon Mar. 15, 2010 12:42 PM EDT
Mon Mar. 15, 2010 11:33 AM EDT
Fri Mar. 12, 2010 12:02 PM EST
Mon Mar. 8, 2010 12:23 PM EST
Fri Mar. 5, 2010 1:32 PM EST
Thu Mar. 4, 2010 1:18 PM EST
Wed Mar. 3, 2010 4:24 PM EST
Tue Mar. 2, 2010 12:06 PM EST
Mon Mar. 1, 2010 11:44 AM EST
Wed Feb. 24, 2010 6:11 PM EST
Wed Feb. 24, 2010 9:47 AM EST
Mon Feb. 22, 2010 4:01 PM EST
Mon Feb. 22, 2010 3:27 PM EST
Wed Feb. 17, 2010 2:00 PM EST
Thu Feb. 11, 2010 10:01 AM EST
Thu Feb. 11, 2010 9:34 AM EST
Mon Feb. 8, 2010 3:22 PM EST
Fri Feb. 5, 2010 12:02 PM EST
Thu Feb. 4, 2010 1:03 PM EST
Fri Jan. 29, 2010 4:20 PM EST
Tue Jan. 26, 2010 1:23 PM EST
Thu Jan. 14, 2010 4:01 AM EST