David Corn

David Corn

Washington Bureau Chief

Corn has broken stories on presidents, politicians, and other Washington players. He's written for numerous publications and is a talk show regular. His best-selling books include Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.

Get my RSS |

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Media Goes Wild Over Hagel Firing But Not Obama's Secret Afghanistan Reversal

| Mon Nov. 24, 2014 12:03 PM EST
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel meets with soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division.

There's little the Washington-centric political-media universe loves more than the story of a fallen star. The defenestration of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has reporters and pundits in a schadenfreude-driven tizzy. Was he fired? Was he in over his head? OMG, look at how the White House is dumping on him, as he departs! Who's passing nasty notes in class about him?

The presumably forced resignation of Hagel is indeed big news. The Obama administration is confronting a host of new national security challenges: ISIS, Ukraine, Ebola. So the guy (or gal) in charge of the Pentagon has to be nimble and able to handle this expanding and shifting to-do list. And Hagel, ever since his underwhelming performance at his confirmation hearing, has not been (at least in public) a confidence-inspiring Cabinet member. So perhaps President Barack Obama can do better—though the elbowing Hagel is receiving on the way out seems poor manners.

Yet here's a useful exercise. Compare the red-hot media reaction to Hagel's bye-bye to the response to the New York Times' eye-popping report that Obama signed a secret order to expand the US military mission in Afghanistan next year. The story about one man—yes, one of the cool kids in DC—is at least an order of magnitude higher on the MediaReax-ometer. Any tidbit from an anonymous source about de-Hagelization gets immediate attention from tweeting journos. But the story about this significant policy shift has prompted mostly a yawn.

In case you missed it—the story was posted online on Friday but appeared in Saturday's dead-trees edition—the Times revealed that Obama, who last May said the United States would have no combat missions in Afghanistan in 2015 (and only train Afghan forces and hunt Al Qaeda "remnants"), had secretly authorized American forces

to carry out missions against the Taliban and other militant groups threatening American troops or the Afghan government, a broader mission than the president described to the public earlier this year, according to several administration, military and congressional officials with knowledge of the decision. The new authorization also allows American jets, bombers and drones to support Afghan troops on combat missions.

Tue Jan. 5, 2010 1:04 PM EST
Thu Dec. 31, 2009 4:01 AM EST
Tue Dec. 29, 2009 4:40 PM EST
Fri Dec. 18, 2009 9:50 AM EST
Fri Dec. 11, 2009 3:01 PM EST
Fri Dec. 11, 2009 11:47 AM EST
Fri Dec. 11, 2009 10:21 AM EST
Thu Dec. 10, 2009 10:25 AM EST
Wed Dec. 9, 2009 4:01 AM EST
Tue Dec. 8, 2009 8:10 PM EST
Tue Dec. 8, 2009 7:39 AM EST
Fri Nov. 20, 2009 11:07 AM EST
Thu Nov. 19, 2009 5:06 PM EST
Wed Nov. 18, 2009 3:14 PM EST
Wed Nov. 18, 2009 11:40 AM EST
Tue Nov. 17, 2009 12:36 PM EST
Mon Nov. 16, 2009 11:49 AM EST
Wed Nov. 11, 2009 11:04 AM EST
Fri Nov. 6, 2009 12:24 PM EST
Thu Nov. 5, 2009 3:53 PM EST
Tue Nov. 3, 2009 11:25 AM EST
Tue Nov. 3, 2009 10:53 AM EST
Thu Oct. 15, 2009 11:14 AM EDT
Mon Oct. 12, 2009 9:52 AM EDT
Tue Oct. 6, 2009 9:20 AM EDT
Fri Oct. 2, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
Fri Oct. 2, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
Thu Oct. 1, 2009 4:25 PM EDT
Tue Sep. 29, 2009 4:31 PM EDT
Tue Sep. 29, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
Sat Sep. 26, 2009 7:47 PM EDT
Fri Sep. 25, 2009 4:00 PM EDT
Fri Sep. 25, 2009 11:05 AM EDT
Wed Sep. 23, 2009 8:55 AM EDT
Fri Sep. 18, 2009 10:31 AM EDT
Fri Sep. 11, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
Thu Sep. 10, 2009 12:48 PM EDT
Wed Sep. 9, 2009 11:13 AM EDT
Tue Sep. 8, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
Thu Sep. 3, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
Thu Sep. 3, 2009 10:27 AM EDT