Gavin Aronsen

Gavin Aronsen

Reporter

Gavin is a Mother Jones reporter in the DC bureau.

Full Bio | Get my RSS |

Gavin is an Iowa native, and covered the 2008 first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses for the Ames Tribune. His work has also appeared in the Agence France-Presse, Iowa Independent, Manhattan Media, and VillageVoice.com.

New Group Unveils Its Plan to Get Money Out of Politics

| Tue Nov. 13, 2012 4:17 PM PST

The 2012 election wrapped up barely a week ago, which means that fundraising for the 2014 midterm election has begun in earnest. But a new campaign to get money out of politics has just launched as well. Represent.Us says its goal is to pass the American Anti-Corruption Act, a nine-point plan to crack down on lobbyists, strengthen the flimsy law intended to prevent super-PACs from coordinating with campaigns, and put a stop to undisclosed donations funneled through dark-money nonprofits. (Represent.Us is a project of United Republic, a campaign finance reform group that, like many of the outside spending organizations it takes aim at, is a 501(c)(4).)

Represent.Us boasts a high-profile, bipartisan board of advisors, among them former Federal Elections Commission chair (and Stephen Colbert's "personal lawyer") Trevor Potter, Lawrence Lessig, disgraced lobbyist-turned-reformer Jack Abramoff, representatives from Occupy Wall Street and the DC Tea Party Patriots, and even Teddy Roosevelt's great-grandson, Theodore IV. The group hopes to to convince 1 million American citizens to join its cause, building on popular revulsion to what it deems "the worst political corruption in American history."

After that, Represent.Us plans to introduce the Anti-Corruption Act to Congress by the end of 2013 and rally cosponsors. It's also got its eye on 2014: The group says it will wage a "hard-hitting campaign" against members of Congress who fail to sign on. No word yet on how it would fund its efforts to unseat those incumbents.

Here's the group's call to action:

Advertise on MotherJones.com

The Man Behind Citizens United Says 2012 Has Vindicated Him

| Mon Nov. 12, 2012 4:08 AM PST
James Bopp, the legal architect of the Citizens United case.

Last month, James Bopp, the legal mind behind the Citizens United case that gave rise to super-PACs and the dark-money boom, told me he didn't really believe Americans were all that upset with the increasing amounts of money spent on politics. "There's a general cynicism among the American people about politicians and politics," he said, but "they could care less about campaign finance."

Now that the election's over, Bopp says he's been vindicated. When I caught up with him late last week, he told me he figures that Mitt Romney's loss was probably due to a variety of factors like poor messaging and spending. Without Citizens United, though, he says the election would have turned out much worse for Republicans: There would have been no counterbalance to the mainstream media. "The lesson here is all the hype over independent spending was just completely overblown," Bopp says. "Nobody can buy an election."

The poor return on investment among the biggest conservative outside spending groups would appear to back that up. You can only spend so much to sway voters, says Bopp. "There's a diminishing returns as you saturate a market. Once you've got your message across, the addtional spending accomplishes nothing." The pro-Romney super-PAC Restore Our Future, for instance, made significant ad buys just one week out from the election in Minnesota and New Mexico, two states that Obama was at no risk of losing. Those moves led reporters to wonder if outside groups had raised more money than they knew what to do with. "That's why this thing about buying elections is fundamentally false," Bopp concludes.

The $6 billion in total spending in 2012 dwarfs that of any recent election, but Bopp simply attributes that to an increasingly bloated system that requires increasing amounts of money to compete against incumbents.

Bopp says the election was "fought to a draw," and "neither side accomplished what they set out to do." The county still has the same president, Republicans still have control of the House, and Democrats still lack a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. As for Obama's consideration of a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, Bopp hopes he pursues it. He's confident that Republicans at the national and state level could block any serious efforts to undo the decision, especially with Republican supporters of the now-defunct McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill like Richard Lugar and Olympia Snowe departing the Senate.

"I hope [Democrats] spend all their time on that," Bopp says, "because it's not going anywhere."

This Week in Dark Money

| Fri Nov. 9, 2012 4:03 AM PST

A quick look at the week that was in the world of political dark money...

the money shot

 

quote of the week

"The billionaire donors I hear are livid. There is some holy hell to pay."
—A Republican operative speaking to the Huffington Post about Karl Rove, who "has a lot of explaining to do." Rove's super-PAC American Crossroads and dark-money group Crossroads GPS spent at least $175 million, but just nine of the 30 candidates that Crossroads supported won. Rove, who claimed that Obama won reelection "by supressing the vote" and with the help of Hurricane Sandy, reportedly held a phone briefing with top donors on Thursday to explain Crossroads' lack of success.

 

chart of the week

Rove wasn't the only operative with a lot of explaining to do. Other conservative super-PACs and dark-money groups that spent a lot did not see great results at the ballot box. Meanwhile, some smaller liberal and labor groups saw respectable returns on their investments.

 

stat of the week

More than $57 million: The amount of disclosed donations from casino magnate and Gingrich-Romney supporter Sheldon Adelson and his wife Miriam. The Adelsons' money got more mileage than Rove's, but about 58 percent of the candidates it supported still lost. Asked by a Norwegian journalist how he thought his money had been spent, Adelson replied, "Paying bills. That's how you spend money. Either that or become a Jewish husband—you spend a lot of money."

 

attack ad of the week

Conservative super-PACs had the clear money advantage throughout the 2012 election, but in the end it was an ad from the pro-Obama super-PAC Priorities USA Action that became the most effective campaign spot, according to TV analytics company Ace Metrix. The ad, "Stage," was part of a nine-spot, $50 million buy in contested states hitting Romney's record at Bain Capital. During the campaign, Republican pollster Frank Luntz told the Huffington Post's Howard Fineman that "that ad alone has killed Mitt Romney in Ohio."

 

more mojo dark-money coverage

Will Republican Mega-Donors Say Sayonara to Super-PACs? Liberal bankrollers soured on partisan politics after the 2004 elections. Will Adelson and co. follow suit after 2012?
Sen. Sherrod Brown Fights Off the Dark-Money Machine to Win in Ohio: Brown's win puts Democrats that much closer to keeping their slim Senate majority.
Sheldon Adelson Is Partying With Mitt Romney on Election Night: It's the least Adelson could expect for his $53 million in pro-GOP donations this election cycle.
9 Incredible Campaign Money Stats: Some quick Election Day stats on Super-PACs, dark money, and…Justin Bieber?!
California's Biggest "Campaign Money Laundering" Scheme, Revealed—Kinda: A bitter fight in California to unmask a secretive donor ends with more questions than answers.
Charts: How Much Have the Kochs Spent to Sway the Vote?: See how much the billionaire brothers have spent in your state—and why the size of their campaign to beat Obama is a mystery.
A Dark Money Group's Sketchy Origins Emerge: More details trickle out about the big donors behind a Montana-based nonprofit that's fighting election spending limits.

 

more must-reads

• Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock, who unsuccessfully challenged the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling, was elected governor despite a last-minute outside-money assault. Center for Public Integrity
• The US Chamber of Commerce was another major outside-spending loser this election. Washington Post
• And Sheldon Adelson wasn't the only megadonor to back a score of losing candidates. Center for Public Integrity
• Even the anti-incumbent super-PAC Campaign for Primary Accountability had better luck than Karl Rove on Tuesday. Slate

How 2012's Biggest Ballot Measures Played Out

| Wed Nov. 7, 2012 2:26 PM PST

Last month, we took a look at 23 ballot measures worth watching in yesterday's election, from same-sex marriage and marijuana legalization to a voter ID amendment and anti-Obamacare initiatives. Here's a look at how those, and a few others, fared last night:

Same-sex marriage
For the first time ever, voters legalized same-sex marriage at the ballot box in Maryland, Maine, and Washington, as MoJo's Kate Sheppard and Adam Serwer report. The night was a huge loss for antigay groups led by the National Organization for Marriage, which also saw a ballot measure in Minnesota for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage go down in flames.

Pot legalization
As Josh Harkinson reports, Colorado became the first state to legalize marijuana outright last night, followed an hour later by Washington. The question now is how far the federal government will go to crack down on the historic new laws. Another legalization measure in Oregon failed, in large part due to concerns that the law would have been overly broad. Meanwhile, voters legalized medical marijuana in Massachusetts but rejected it in Arkansas, and in Montana approved a measure that tightens restrictions on the state's existing medical marijuana laws.

Thu Mar. 21, 2013 3:56 PM PDT
Tue Mar. 19, 2013 8:51 AM PDT
Mon Mar. 18, 2013 1:03 PM PDT
Fri Mar. 15, 2013 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Mar. 1, 2013 3:29 PM PST
Fri Feb. 15, 2013 4:01 AM PST
Fri Jan. 11, 2013 4:01 AM PST
Fri Nov. 30, 2012 4:08 AM PST
Thu Nov. 15, 2012 5:00 PM PST
Fri Nov. 9, 2012 4:03 AM PST
Wed Nov. 7, 2012 2:26 PM PST
Fri Nov. 2, 2012 3:08 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 26, 2012 4:28 PM PDT
Fri Oct. 26, 2012 3:03 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 24, 2012 3:03 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 22, 2012 3:03 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 19, 2012 3:03 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 12, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 5, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 28, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 28, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 21, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 14, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 7, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Aug. 31, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Aug. 24, 2012 3:01 AM PDT
Fri Aug. 17, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Aug. 10, 2012 3:00 AM PDT