Kate Sheppard

Kate Sheppard

Reporter

Kate Sheppard is a staff reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. She can be reached by email at ksheppard (at) motherjones (dot) com.

Full Bio | Get my RSS |

Her work has also been featured in the New York Times' Room for Debate blog, the Guardian's Comment Is Free, Foreign Policy, High Country News, The Center for Public Integrity, the Washington Independent, Washington Spectator, Who Runs Gov, In These Times, and Bitch. She was raised on a vegetable farm in southern New Jersey (yes, they do exist), but has adapted well to life in the nation's capital. She misses trees and having a congressional representative with voting power, but thinks DC is pretty great anyway.

Fracking Wastewater Threatens to Drown Ohio

| Wed Jan. 23, 2013 11:55 AM PST

First, the good news: Using the process known as hydraulic fracturing to create natural gas wells produces less wastewater than wells created using more conventional methods, according to a new study in the journal Water Resources Research. Scientists from Duke and Kent State universities found that fracked wells create 35 percent as much wastewater per unit of gas when compared to conventional wells. The scientists note that this upsets the common idea that fracking creates more wastewater than other types of gas extraction.

But now the bad news. Because of fracking, gas extraction is up 570 percent since 2004 in the Marcellus shale region, which means that there's a whole lot more wastewater overall to deal with.

Because of fracking, gas extraction is up 570 percent since 2004 in the Marcellus shale region.

"On one hand, shale gas production generates less wastewater per unit," explained co-author Brian Lutz, an assistant professor of biogeochemistry at Kent State. "On the other hand, because of the massive size of the Marcellus resource, the overall volume of water that now has to be transported and treated is immense. It threatens to overwhelm the region's wastewater-disposal infrastructure capacity."

And while most of that fracking is taking place in Pennsylvania right now, Ohio is taking a huge portion of the wastewater. As the Akron Beacon Journal points out, Pennsylvania's 6,400 active wells created 20 million barrels of wastewater in 2011, and about 35 percent of it—7 million barrels—was disposed of in injection wells in Ohio, accounting for more than half of the wastewater Ohio dealt with.

Ohio can't do much to stop Pennsylvania from shipping its wastewater over the border due to the interstate commerce clause in the Constitution, which stipulates that only Congress can regulate this type of interstate trade. The best the state can do is set tougher rules on disposing of that wastewater, which has been discussed but not acted upon. Citizens in Mansfield, Ohio, voted last year to block injection wells in their town, however.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Mississippi and the State of Abortion 40 Years After Roe

| Tue Jan. 22, 2013 10:54 AM PST
pro-choice protester

Tuesday is the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion throughout the United States. To mark the date, we've posted my dispatch from Jackson, Mississippi, where women may soon be unable to exercise the right Roe v. Wade guaranteed them, because the state is threatening to close its last abortion clinic.

Last April, Mississippi passed a new law requiring all doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. The two doctors that provide abortions at JWHO live out of state and don't have those admitting privileges, although the clinic already has a relationship with a local obstetrician who can admit women to the hospital in case of an emergency. When the law passed, the clinic knew it would not be able to comply. The local hospitals in this largely anti-abortion state refused to grant admitting privileges to abortion providers. A judge gave the clinic until mid-January to apply, but, as expected, no hospital would grant the privileges.

This was, I should note, the point of the law. Upon signing the legislation, Republican Gov. Phil Bryant called it "the first step in a movement, I believe, to do what we campaigned on—to say that we're going to try to end abortion in Mississippi."

Now Jackson Women's Health Organization could be closed very soon. Last week, the Health Department completed its inspection and determined the clinic is not complying with the new law. This was expected; the clinic's legal representatives from the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a motion asking the court to block enforcement of the law because it could not comply. The inspection begins the legal process to revoke the clinic's license, but actually doing so will take until the first week of March, according to the clinic's lawyers. The clinic is briefing the judge later this week, and expects that there will be a hearing or some sort of decision before March.

The goal in highlighting the Jackson Women's Health Organization is to illustrate the state of abortion care 40 years after Roe. Mississippi is the most extreme example of a state where lawmakers have introduced restriction after restriction in the past decades, pushing providers to the point where they have one clinic and zero in-state abortion providers. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the state has the lowest abortion rate in the country.

Many people will say, "Oh yeah, well, it's Mississippi, what do you expect?" But there are other states that aren't too far away from this reality. Both North and South Dakota are also down to one clinic and zero in-state providers. The number of abortion providers in the country has declined 38 percent from its peak in 1982, according to the National Partnership for Women & Families. Meanwhile, states have passed a record number of new abortion restrictions in the past two years: 92 new laws in 2011 and 43 in 2012. So although many women may have the right to access abortion, the actual opportunity to do so is becoming harder to come by.

Friday Downer: BPA Substitute Is Still Bad For You

| Fri Jan. 18, 2013 3:27 PM PST
baby bottle

Years of research have found evidence that Bisphenol A—also know as BPA—is making humans fat and anxious, screwing with our ovaries, and making us develop tumors in our breasts and brains. Those findings have prompted regulators in the US, Canada, and the European Union to ban BPA in baby bottles (though other products still contain it). But new research published this week in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives indicates that a major chemical substitute isn't much better.

BPA creates problems when it leaches into foods and liquids, since inside the human body it mimics estrogen and screws with your endocrine system. Given the ever-growing body of evidence that it's bad for you, manufacturers have been looking for BPA substitutes. One of those newer substitutes is Bisphenol S. While it is less likely to leach from the plastic when it comes in contact with heat or sunlight, it can still leach into food and liquids under normal use. This most recent study, conducted with rat cells, found once it got into their bodies, Bisphenol S behaved much like BPA. Like BPA, BPS also disrupts the endocrine system, making cells signal, grow, and die in ways they shouldn't. 

Study co-author Cheryl Watson, a professor in the biochemistry and molecular biology department at the University of Texas, notes that both BPA and BPS can have a large impact even in small doses, much like hormones. "If hormones act that potently, it's not much of a surprise that componds that mimic hormones act very potently," Watson told Mother Jones.

Watson also suggested that there should be more testing of chemicals like BPS before they're put into consumer products. She's working with other biologists and chemists on an effort, called Tierd Protocol for Endocrine Disruption (or TiPED) to get the two branches of science to collaborate on this kind of testing. "Why not pretest chemical before someone does all the work and investment of putting them into a product, and then we spend the next 20 years fighting about it?" said Watson. "Think of all the money spent on lawsuits, human disease. There's an awful lot of societal expense in regulating these products after they are introduced."

 

Tue Nov. 9, 2010 10:25 AM PST
Tue Nov. 9, 2010 4:00 AM PST
Mon Nov. 8, 2010 12:21 PM PST
Mon Nov. 8, 2010 9:20 AM PST
Fri Nov. 5, 2010 3:30 AM PDT
Fri Nov. 5, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Thu Nov. 4, 2010 10:03 AM PDT
Thu Nov. 4, 2010 9:12 AM PDT
Wed Nov. 3, 2010 10:58 AM PDT
Tue Nov. 2, 2010 9:37 PM PDT
Tue Nov. 2, 2010 3:50 PM PDT
Mon Nov. 1, 2010 10:30 AM PDT
Mon Nov. 1, 2010 9:12 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 28, 2010 9:21 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 28, 2010 7:38 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 28, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 28, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 27, 2010 3:55 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 27, 2010 3:41 AM PDT
Tue Oct. 26, 2010 12:00 PM PDT
Tue Oct. 26, 2010 8:32 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 25, 2010 12:15 PM PDT
Mon Oct. 25, 2010 9:52 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 25, 2010 2:30 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 22, 2010 1:45 PM PDT
Fri Oct. 22, 2010 6:16 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 21, 2010 12:02 PM PDT
Thu Oct. 21, 2010 7:01 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 20, 2010 10:26 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 20, 2010 8:28 AM PDT
Tue Oct. 19, 2010 10:34 AM PDT
Tue Oct. 19, 2010 9:33 AM PDT
Tue Oct. 19, 2010 7:12 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 15, 2010 6:48 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 15, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 14, 2010 1:30 PM PDT
Thu Oct. 14, 2010 7:28 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 13, 2010 1:50 PM PDT