Kate Sheppard

Kate Sheppard

Reporter

Kate Sheppard is a staff reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. She can be reached by email at ksheppard (at) motherjones (dot) com.

Full Bio | Get my RSS |

Her work has also been featured in the New York Times' Room for Debate blog, the Guardian's Comment Is Free, Foreign Policy, High Country News, The Center for Public Integrity, the Washington Independent, Washington Spectator, Who Runs Gov, In These Times, and Bitch. She was raised on a vegetable farm in southern New Jersey (yes, they do exist), but has adapted well to life in the nation's capital. She misses trees and having a congressional representative with voting power, but thinks DC is pretty great anyway.

North Dakota Passes Ban on Abortions After 6 Weeks of Pregnancy

| Fri Mar. 15, 2013 2:54 PM PDT

The North Dakota legislature approved the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States on Friday, cutting off abortion access as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. The bill, HB 1456, makes it illegal for doctors to perform an abortion if a heartbeat is detectable in the fetus—something that can happen as little as six weeks after conception. It passed the Senate by a vote of 26 to 17, and will now head to the desk of Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple.

North Dakota lawmakers have been considering a variety of anti-abortion bills. While this wasn't their most extreme option—another bill would have outlawed all abortions, period—it does mean that North Dakota now has the most restrictive abortion law in the country. This comes just over a week after Arkansas claimed the crown for most restrictive abortion laws, passing a twelve-week ban.

The law will almost inevitably be challenged in court, as it takes a clear shot at Roe vs Wade's protection of a right to an abortion up until the point the fetus is viable. But legal groups challenging state restrictions have a lot on their hands as states undertake what Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, called a "state-by-state race to the bottom on women's health" in an email after the North Dakota vote.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Obama's New New Climate Plan

| Fri Mar. 15, 2013 10:19 AM PDT

On Friday, President Obama announced plans for a $2 billion research initiative for clean energy technology.

Here's how the White House described it:

Over 10 years, the Energy Security Trust will provide $2 billion for critical, cutting-edge research focused on developing cost-effective transportation alternatives. The funding will be provided by revenues from federal oil and gas development, and will not add any additional costs to the federal budget. The investments will support research into a range of technologies – things like advanced vehicles that run on electricity, homegrown biofuels, and domestically produced natural gas. It will also help fund a small number of real-world experiments that try different transportation techniques in cities and towns around the country using advanced vehicles at scale.

Obama first called for an Energy Trust Fund in his State of the Union address last month. Under his plan, the $2 billion would come from royalties for federal oil and gas leases. The proposal asks Congress to include this in their 2014 budget.

This is today's second bit of good news for environmental advocates. The administration is also expected to announce that it is directing all agencies to take emissions into account when approving new projects, which includes highways, pipelines, and drilling plans. The guidance is expected to direct agencies to consider climate when they make assessments under the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act. The law was passed to look at more direct environmental risks, like the potential for oil spills or the destruction of habitat, but the White House Council on Environmental Quality is expected to tell the agencies to look at the potential impact on emissions now, too.

UPDATE: Well, perhaps we should have known this was a little too good to be true for a Friday. The Washington Post is reporting that the Obama administration plans to revise rules on emissions from new power plants it released last year, which would likely delay their implementation. 

The discussions center on the first-ever greenhouse gas regulations for power plants, which were proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency nearly a year ago. Rewriting the proposal would significantly delay any action, and might allow the agency to set a separate standard for coal-fired power plants, which are roughly twice as polluting as those fueled by natural gas.
While the move could bolster the administration’s legal justification for regulating power plants’ carbon emissions, any retreat on the rules would be a blow to environmental groups and their supporters, who constituted a crucial voting block for President Obama and other Democrats in last year's elections.

Will North Carolina Nix Its Renewable Energy Mandate?

| Fri Mar. 15, 2013 3:00 AM PDT
solar panels

In North Carolina, legislators are working to undo the progress their state has made on renewable energy.

Back in 2007, it was the first southern state to pass a renewable energy mandate. The law requires investor-owned utilities to draw 12.5 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2021. But House bill 298, introduced on Wednesday, would end that mandate altogether.

Let's just savor, for a minute, this nugget about the bill's sponsor, from the Charlotte Observer:

The bill’s leading sponsor, Republican Rep. Mike Hager, is a former Duke Energy engineer who has repeatedly said that energy sources for generating electricity should be chosen on a least-cost basis rather than being selected by government policy. The leading nonrenewable options are natural gas, coal and nuclear.
"I don’t think you should be subsidizing businesses into longevity," Hager said. “I’ve had one or two tell me they’ll never get off subsidies. I’ll pay for them, my children will pay for them and my grandchildren will pay for them.”

Duke Energy, may I remind you, is the largest utility in the country, one that has received millions and millions in subsidies for fossil fuels over the years.

Greenpeace's Connor Gibson points out that Hager's bill resembles the "Electricity Freedom Act," a piece of model legislation rolling back renewable energy mandates promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council, the well-known public policy group uniting conservative lawmakers and corporate interests. Yes, Hager has a history of involvement with the organization.

Under its current law, the state has added clean energy-related jobs. Environmental Entrepreneurs, a program of the Natural Resources Defense Council, released a report recently finding that North Carolina announced more new clean energy and transportation projects than any other state in 2012. NRDC reports these projects were set to create 10,867 new jobs—more than in anywhere else besides California.

Fri Jun. 1, 2012 1:36 PM PDT
Fri Jun. 1, 2012 9:50 AM PDT
Fri Jun. 1, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Thu May. 31, 2012 9:57 AM PDT
Fri May. 25, 2012 12:00 PM PDT
Fri May. 25, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Thu May. 24, 2012 11:49 AM PDT
Thu May. 24, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Mon May. 21, 2012 12:33 PM PDT
Fri May. 18, 2012 1:19 PM PDT
Tue May. 15, 2012 9:33 AM PDT
Tue May. 15, 2012 7:02 AM PDT
Mon May. 14, 2012 11:20 AM PDT
Mon May. 14, 2012 10:22 AM PDT
Fri May. 11, 2012 11:23 AM PDT
Thu May. 10, 2012 12:51 PM PDT
Wed May. 9, 2012 12:10 PM PDT
Wed May. 9, 2012 8:59 AM PDT
Mon May. 7, 2012 10:32 AM PDT
Fri May. 4, 2012 7:10 AM PDT
Fri Apr. 20, 2012 10:20 AM PDT
Thu Apr. 12, 2012 3:21 PM PDT
Tue Apr. 10, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Mon Apr. 9, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Apr. 6, 2012 1:21 PM PDT
Thu Apr. 5, 2012 12:52 PM PDT
Thu Apr. 5, 2012 12:35 PM PDT
Thu Mar. 29, 2012 10:48 AM PDT