Kate Sheppard

Kate Sheppard

Reporter

Kate Sheppard is a staff reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. She can be reached by email at ksheppard (at) motherjones (dot) com.

Full Bio | Get my RSS |

Her work has also been featured in the New York Times' Room for Debate blog, the Guardian's Comment Is Free, Foreign Policy, High Country News, The Center for Public Integrity, the Washington Independent, Washington Spectator, Who Runs Gov, In These Times, and Bitch. She was raised on a vegetable farm in southern New Jersey (yes, they do exist), but has adapted well to life in the nation's capital. She misses trees and having a congressional representative with voting power, but thinks DC is pretty great anyway.

Even These Republican Women Lawmakers Think ND Went Too Far

| Fri Mar. 22, 2013 3:00 AM PDT
North Dakota

North Dakota won our Anti-Choice March Madness tournament, but apparently the state's anti-abortion laws have gone too far for even some Republican lawmakers.

Laura Bassett reports at Huffington Post that several Republican women lawmakers plan to attend a rally next week protesting the state's latest abortion law, which will make it the most restrictive state in the country:

"It's to say, hey, this isn't okay. We have stepped over the line," said state Rep. Kathy Hawken (R-Fargo) in a phone interview with The Huffington Post. "One of the key tenets of the Republican Party is personal responsibility. I'm personally pro-life, but I vote pro-choice, because you can't make that decision for anyone else. You just can't."

Now would be a good time to raise that point to fellow Republican lawmakers, who are currently considering two even more restrictive fetal "personhood" measures as well.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Billionaire Clean Energy Advocate Pledges to Spend Big in Mass.

| Tue Mar. 19, 2013 1:52 PM PDT
ed markeyRep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)

A group of young activists is pairing up with a billionaire philanthropist to try to make the Keystone XL pipeline, and climate change, a central issue in the Democratic primary in Massachusetts. 

Tom Steyer, a former hedge fund manager and clean energy evangelist, has spent more than $37 million to pass and defend climate and energy initiatives in California. Now he's forming a super-PAC to spend on the April 30 Democratic primary for the special election to fill Massachusetts' empty Senate seat.

Steyer and young environmentalists are targeting Dem Rep. Steve Lynch for his support of the Keystone XL pipeline. Lynch voted for a House bill last year that called for the Obama administration to approve the controversial pipeline. Lynch's opponent in the primary, Rep. Ed Markey, has the support of a number of environmental groups and opposes the pipeline.

Steyer joined with Craig S. Altemose of the Better Future Project and three other Massachusetts college students to write a open letter to Lynch on Monday demanding he change his position on the pipeline:

Because climate change is such a serious issue, and because it is on the ballot as never before, we are asking you, Congressman Lynch, today to do one of two things by high noon on Friday, March 22. Either act like a real Democrat and oppose Keystone’s dirty energy. Or, get a sworn, binding statement – with securities law enforcement – from TransCanada and the refiners that all of the Keystone-shipped oil will stay here.

If Lynch doesn't change his tune, they wrote, Steyer will then "immediately launch an aggressive public education campaign" against Lynch. In an interview with Mother Jones, Chris Lehane, a spokesman for Steyer, declined to say how much they would spend on such a campaign, but said it would include paid media, get out the vote work, and field campaigns.

Steyer became involved in the Massachusetts race after Altemose and the other young activists reached out. ​Altemose said their effort is "less of an endorsement of Markey and more a repudiation of Lynch's actions." The campaign, he said, is designed to "make sure there's political consequences for disregarding future generations."

"For someone to believe they can represent Massachusetts and be supporting policies that take us backward to the dirty energy past is just mind boggling," Altemose said.

Conservatives Outraged About Mountaintop Removal in Tennessee... By Chinese Company

| Tue Mar. 19, 2013 11:23 AM PDT

What's it take to get conservatives in Tennessee fired up about blowing up mountains? China, apparently.

On Tuesday, the Tennessee Conservative Union, which bills itself as the state's "largest and oldest conservative group," started running anti-mountaintop removal coal mining ads on television throughout the state. Their complaint? The Chinese company Guizhou Guochuang Energy Holding Group announced last year that it is acquiring Triple H Coal Mining, which does mountaintop removal. The Tennessee Conservative Union ad warns that they will become "the first state in our great nation to permit the red Chinese to destroy our mountains and take our coal."

"We're proud that Tennessee is a red state," the ad concludes. "But just how red are we willing to go?"

The ad comes off as anti-China, but it also offers a critique of mountaintop removal coal mining in general, which is the big news here. The ad comes just a day before committees in both the state Senate and House are expected to vote on the Scenic Vistas Protection Act, a bill activists have been trying to get passed in the state for six years. The measure would make it illegal to blow up mountaintops to mine coal. Supporters are taking TCU's support for the bill as a sign that it might gain more traction this year.

"The Tennessee Conservative Union is 100% pro-Coal, but our organization does not support destroying our mountain heritage," TCU Chairman Lloyd Daugherty said in a statement Tuesday. "Mountaintop removal mining kills jobs because it takes fewer workers to blow up a mountain."

JW Randolph, Tennessee director of Appalachian Voices, a group that has been working to pass the anti-mountaintop removal law, welcomed the ad. "We don't care if you're from Bristol or Beijing, blowing up the oldest mountains in America for a few tons of coal is a bad idea," he said. 

Here's TCU's ad:

North Dakota Passes Ban on Abortions After 6 Weeks of Pregnancy

| Fri Mar. 15, 2013 2:54 PM PDT

The North Dakota legislature approved the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States on Friday, cutting off abortion access as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. The bill, HB 1456, makes it illegal for doctors to perform an abortion if a heartbeat is detectable in the fetus—something that can happen as little as six weeks after conception. It passed the Senate by a vote of 26 to 17, and will now head to the desk of Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple.

North Dakota lawmakers have been considering a variety of anti-abortion bills. While this wasn't their most extreme option—another bill would have outlawed all abortions, period—it does mean that North Dakota now has the most restrictive abortion law in the country. This comes just over a week after Arkansas claimed the crown for most restrictive abortion laws, passing a twelve-week ban.

The law will almost inevitably be challenged in court, as it takes a clear shot at Roe vs Wade's protection of a right to an abortion up until the point the fetus is viable. But legal groups challenging state restrictions have a lot on their hands as states undertake what Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, called a "state-by-state race to the bottom on women's health" in an email after the North Dakota vote.

Mon Oct. 24, 2011 1:44 PM PDT
Fri Oct. 21, 2011 11:30 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 17, 2011 11:50 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 17, 2011 11:23 AM PDT
Fri Oct. 14, 2011 2:31 PM PDT
Thu Oct. 13, 2011 6:34 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 12, 2011 12:08 PM PDT
Tue Oct. 11, 2011 6:29 AM PDT
Mon Oct. 10, 2011 10:38 AM PDT
Thu Oct. 6, 2011 1:31 PM PDT
Thu Oct. 6, 2011 10:03 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 5, 2011 3:40 PM PDT
Tue Oct. 4, 2011 6:34 AM PDT
Thu Sep. 29, 2011 3:06 PM PDT
Tue Sep. 27, 2011 11:11 AM PDT
Tue Sep. 27, 2011 4:00 AM PDT
Mon Sep. 26, 2011 11:32 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 23, 2011 1:21 PM PDT
Fri Sep. 23, 2011 7:37 AM PDT
Thu Sep. 22, 2011 7:07 PM PDT
Thu Sep. 22, 2011 2:15 PM PDT
Thu Sep. 22, 2011 12:25 PM PDT
Thu Sep. 22, 2011 9:45 AM PDT
Wed Sep. 21, 2011 9:37 AM PDT
Wed Sep. 21, 2011 8:57 AM PDT
Mon Sep. 19, 2011 3:12 PM PDT
Thu Sep. 15, 2011 2:16 PM PDT
Mon Sep. 12, 2011 12:36 PM PDT
Mon Sep. 12, 2011 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 9, 2011 12:21 PM PDT
Thu Sep. 8, 2011 12:40 PM PDT
Wed Sep. 7, 2011 8:31 AM PDT
Wed Sep. 7, 2011 3:00 AM PDT
Fri Sep. 2, 2011 10:00 AM PDT
Tue Aug. 30, 2011 3:00 AM PDT
Mon Aug. 29, 2011 9:36 AM PDT
Fri Aug. 26, 2011 2:00 PM PDT