Mark Follman

Mark Follman

Senior Editor

Mark Follman is a senior editor at Mother Jones. He is a former editor of Salon and a cofounder of the MediaBugs project. His reporting and commentary have also appeared in Salon, Rolling Stone, The Atlanticthe Boston Globe, USA Today, and on Fox News and NPR's All Things Considered. The in-depth investigation into mass shootings he led for Mother Jones has been honored with multiple awards: The 2013 Izzy Award, two Society of Professional Journalists awards for reporting excellence, and an Online Journalism Award.

Get my RSS |

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Breitbart Site Says Big Blunder Was "Minor Citation Error"

| Wed Sep. 21, 2011 8:40 AM PDT
Andrew Breitbart.

Earlier this week I wrote about a piece published on Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com that relies so heavily on flawed assertions about a new global-warming study that it's ripe for a retraction. Not only did the piece wrongly attribute an author to the new study, published in Nature in late August, but it also recycled an old quote from that person to promote its claim that the study definitively refuted human-caused climate change. (The study, as I explained in detail, did nothing of the sort.)

Multiple attempts the prior week to reach Breitbart and the writer of the piece, Chriss W. Street, about the erroneous contents had failed to get their attention. But apparently my story (and subsequent posts in The New York Times, Salon and Media Matters) did: An editor's note appeared on the Big Government piece later the same day. Unfortunately, it's more of a wreck than it is rectifying. Breitbart.com's "in-house counsel" Joel Pollak says in the note:

Earlier today, Mother Jones...accused Andrew Breitbart of a "global warming blunder" because the piece below cited Jykri Kauppinen as an author of a Nature study on cosmic rays. The author of the piece, Chriss W. Street, has indicated that Kauppinen is the author of a separate submission to Nature in 2010 that also contests the UN Climate Panel's "consensus" view on the degree to which human activity contributes to global climate change. Street stands by his argument, regardless of the minor citation error that Breitbart's habitual critics on the left have attempted to magnify.

Why Street failed to "indicate" in his piece the true orgin of Kauppinen's comments, and why he passed them off as a conclusion of the study just published in Nature, Pollak doesn't say. Nor does Pollak explain why the piece continues to state, erroneously, that Kauppinen is one of the new study's authors. (Chalk it up, perhaps, to the stuff of "minor citation.") As for Big Government's blatantly wrong claim that the new study debunks overwhelming scientific consensus on humanity's role in climate change, it seems that one was, well, simply too hot for them to touch.

Vancouver’s Bold War on Drugs

| Fri Apr. 22, 2011 3:46 PM PDT

Guest blogger Mark Follman writes frequently about current affairs and culture at markfollman.com.

For many years Vancouver has had a serious heroin addiction. So it's heartening to see that one of the city's boldest strategies for confronting the problem, launched eight years ago, is continuing to meet with serious success: Vancouver's government-backed "supervised injection site"—the first of its kind in North America—has helped reduce the number of fatal drug overdoses in the city by 35 percent, according to a new scientific report detailed in the Vancouver Sun.

The news is gratifying for me personally, having invested deeply in the issue with a reporting project I did for Salon beginning in 2003. (My initial story from Vancouver's notorious Downtown Eastside—a neighborhood much changed these days, particularly since the 2010 Winter Games—is linked above.) Reporting another piece in 2006, one of the most striking things I found was that early results from Insite, as it's called, had already converted some hardcore conservatives. Then city councilor George Chow—who had campaigned vigorously against the injection site when running for office—told me in fall 2006 that conservatives' ideological fears had been misguided. They had declared that a government-sponsored facility for helping drug users shoot up would only breed more chaos.

Tue Feb. 5, 2013 4:26 AM PST
Thu Sep. 20, 2012 12:23 PM PDT
Fri Aug. 24, 2012 3:17 PM PDT
Thu Jun. 21, 2012 3:59 PM PDT
Fri May. 11, 2012 3:43 PM PDT
Wed Mar. 21, 2012 11:08 AM PDT
Fri Apr. 22, 2011 3:46 PM PDT
Wed Dec. 22, 2010 10:01 PM PST
Tue Jul. 28, 2009 9:42 AM PDT
Tue Jun. 9, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
Fri Mar. 27, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
Tue Mar. 24, 2009 12:20 PM PDT