Monika Bauerlein

Monika Bauerlein

Editor in Chief

Since taking the helm at Mother Jones in 2006, Monika and her co-editor, Clara Jeffery, have won two National Magazine Awards, launched a nine-person Washington bureau, relaunched the website, given birth, and forgotten what it’s like to sleep.

Full Bio | Get my RSS |

Monika Bauerlein is co-editor of Mother Jones, where, together with Clara Jeffery, she spearheaded an era of editorial growth and innovation, marked by two National Magazine Awards for general excellence, the addition of a seven-person Washington Bureau, and an overhaul of the organization’s digital strategy that tripled MotherJones.com's traffic. Previously she was Mother Jones' investigative editor, focusing on long-form projects marrying in-depth reportage, document sleuthing, and narrative appeal. She has also worked as an alternative-weekly editor (at Minneapolis/St. Paul’s City Pages), a correspondent for US and European publications in Washington, D.C. and at the United Nations, an AP stringer, corporate trainer, translator, sausage slinger and fishing-line packager. She lives in Oakland.

More ways to wreck whale ears

| Tue Jun. 20, 2006 11:51 PM PDT

Let's see. Most of the world has agreed to protect whales from extinction; whales rely on sound waves to navigate, communicate, in short, survive; so what we'll do is shoot "air guns" (sounds so innocuous, right?) into the ocean whose deafening sound can be heard from the California coast clear to the other end of the Pacific? This makes sense in whose world? The answer in a second; meanwhile, check out whale expert Dick Russell's piece in Mother Jones special oceans coverage on another sound source that has been causing whales to beach themselves en masse, some with their brains literally scrambled. Now--ready? The air guns (which are bad for squid, too) are "critical in the search for tomorrow's oil and gas resources," according to Exxon Mobil.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Can't We Just Have a Moment of Silence?

| Tue Jun. 20, 2006 1:39 PM PDT

This is awful. And doesn't it seem... unseemly somehow to jump on the deaths as instant debate fodder?

Faster, Pussycat! Drill! Drill!

| Tue Jun. 13, 2006 3:54 PM PDT

A while back, Mother Jones' Osha Gray Davidson exposed the environmental m.o. of the Bush administration in a piece focusing on the under-the-radar nature of policymaking in the age of Rove:

"What makes this administration different is the fact that it is filled with anti-regulatory zealots deep into its rank and file...The result is an administration uniquely effective at implementing its ambitious pro-industry agenda-with a minimum of public notice."

Now comes the LA Times with a terrific story illustrating just how this works. In a nutshell, way back when, the Clinton administration came up with a rule that would have forced oil drillers to do more to keep gunk out of the groundwater. The drillers were not happy, and in 2002--when the EPA was still working on implementing the restrictions--a Texas oilman who happens to have been the mayor of Midland and also happened to have once run Reagan's Texas campaign, wrote to his friend Karl Rove to "openly express doubt as to the merit of electing Republicans when we wind up with this type of stupidity."

You know the rest; the rule is history, thanks in part to the folks over at the Office of Management and Budget, who made sure those EPA bureaucrats toed the line. Write the LAT's Tom Hamburger and Peter Wallsten,

Environmentalists pointed to the Rove correspondence as evidence that the Bush White House, more than others, has mixed politics with policy decisions that are traditionally left to scientists and career regulators.

Ya think?

Next villain, please

| Tue Jun. 13, 2006 3:13 PM PDT

Riverbend, the girl blogger on the Tigris, has a bitter (how would you not be bitter in Baghdad?) take on Zarqawi:

"To hell with Zarqawi (or Zayrkawi as Bush calls him). He was an American creation -- he came along with them -- they don't need him anymore, apparently. His influence was greatly exaggerated but he was the justification for every single family they killed through military strikes and troops. It was WMD at first, then it was Saddam, then it was Zarqawi. Who will it be now?"

Indeed, whom, or what, will we blame now? Killing Zarqawi was probably the only thing the administration could have done in Iraq that was guaranteed to generate positive spin--and the spin won't last. Someone, somewhere, must be thinking about how to follow this act between now and November.

Tue Mar. 12, 2013 6:40 PM PDT
Sun Feb. 17, 2013 10:02 PM PST
Fri Apr. 27, 2012 12:00 AM PDT
Sat Feb. 4, 2012 2:34 PM PST
Tue Jun. 21, 2011 2:47 PM PDT
Tue May. 3, 2011 12:19 AM PDT
Fri Feb. 4, 2011 2:00 AM PST
Mon Oct. 25, 2010 3:00 AM PDT
Mon Apr. 19, 2010 12:00 AM PDT
Mon Jan. 11, 2010 1:01 PM PST
Wed Dec. 30, 2009 3:33 AM PST
Mon Dec. 7, 2009 1:16 AM PST
Wed Nov. 4, 2009 9:42 AM PST
Fri Oct. 23, 2009 4:25 AM PDT
Wed Oct. 14, 2009 9:36 PM PDT
Wed Sep. 23, 2009 12:01 AM PDT
Thu Sep. 10, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
Wed Aug. 19, 2009 9:46 PM PDT
Sat Aug. 15, 2009 9:49 AM PDT
Thu Aug. 13, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
Tue Aug. 11, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
Tue Aug. 11, 2009 4:00 AM PDT
Thu Aug. 6, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Thu Aug. 6, 2009 1:30 AM PDT
Mon Jun. 1, 2009 5:25 AM PDT
Wed Mar. 25, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
Wed Feb. 18, 2009 11:22 PM PST
Tue Feb. 17, 2009 4:55 PM PST
Tue Jan. 6, 2009 2:09 PM PST
Tue Dec. 23, 2008 3:00 PM PST
Wed Dec. 17, 2008 1:42 PM PST
Tue Nov. 4, 2008 12:46 AM PST
Thu Sep. 25, 2008 10:59 PM PDT