Nick Baumann

Nick Baumann

Senior Editor

Nick is based in our DC bureau, where he covers national politics and civil liberties issues. Nick has also written for The Economist, The Atlantic, the Washington Monthly, and Commonweal. Email tips and insights to nbaumann [at] motherjones [dot] com. You can also follow him on Facebook.

Get my RSS |

10 Things You Get Now That Obamacare Survived

| Thu Jun. 28, 2012 11:40 AM EDT

The US Supreme Court on Thursday largely upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the centerpiece of President Obama's first term in office. Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative appointed by George W. Bush, joined with the high court's four liberals and penned the majority opinion. In their dissent, the court's four other conservative justices said they would have struck down the entire law.

So what does the court's ruling mean for regular Americans?

After the ACA's passage in 2010, Mother Jones' Nick Baumann listed 10 ways Obama's signature health care law will impact the healthy and sick, young and old, rich and poor. Here they are:

1) Insurance companies can no longer impose lifetime coverage limits on your insurance. Never again will you face the risk of getting really sick and then, a few months in, having your insurer tell you, "Sorry, you've 'run out' of coverage." Almost everyone I've met knows someone who had insurance but got really, really sick (or had a kid get really sick) and ran into a lifetime cap.

2) If you don't know someone who has run into a lifetime cap, you probably know someone who has run into an annual cap. The use of these will be sharply limited. (They'll be eliminated entirely in 2014.)

3) Insurers can no longer tell kids with preexisting conditions that they'll insure them "except for" the preexisting condition. That's called preexisting condition exclusion, and it's out the window.

4) A special, temporary program will help adults with preexisting conditions get coverage. It expires in 2014, when the health insurance exchanges—basically big "pools" of businesses and individuals—come on-line. That's when all insurers will have to cover everyone, preexisting condition or not.

5) Insurance companies can't drop you when you get sick, either—this plan means the end of "rescissions."

6) You can stay on your parents' insurance until you're 26.

7) Seniors get $250 towards closing the "doughnut hole" in their prescription drug coverage. Currently, prescription drug coverage ends once you've spent $2,700 on drugs and it doesn't kick in again until you've spent nearly $6,200. James Ridgeway wrote about the problems with the doughnut hole for Mother Jones in the September/October 2008 issue. Eventually, the health care reform bill will close the donut hole entirely. The AARP has more on immediate health care benefits for seniors. Next year (i.e., in nine months), 50 percent of the doughnut hole will be covered.

8) Medicare's preventive benefits now come with a free visit with your primary care doctor every year to plan out your prevention services. And there are no more co-pays for preventative services in Medicare.

9) This is a big one: Small businesses get big tax credits—up to 50 percent of premium costs—for offering health insurance to their workers.

10) Insurers with unusually high administrative costs have to offer rebates to their customers, and every insurance company has to reveal how much it spends on overhead.

UPDATE: Here's one more big benefit we've found out about since the ACA passed:

11) Free birth control and other preventative services for women, unless you work for a faith-based organization that opposes birth control.

Hungry for more? Read Adam Serwer's breakdown of what the Supreme Court's decision means and what comes next

Advertise on MotherJones.com

GOP Candidate Says Tammy Baldwin's Philosophy "Has Its Roots" in Communism

| Mon Jun. 25, 2012 8:40 AM EDT
Wisconsin Sen. Robert La Follette, Sr. making a radio speech. He was a progressive, not a communist. There's a difference.

Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D) is running for Senate in Wisconsin, where she will probably end up facing former GOP Gov. Tommy Thompson. But Thompson faces a challenge from the right—Eric Hovde, a wealthy former CNBC talking head, who has apparently decided that the best way to win a Republican primary these days is to suggest the Democratic candidate is a communist. Here's Hovde:

"I fundamentally disagree with Tammy on almost everything. She has a more liberal voting record than almost anybody in Congress," he told The Hill in a recent interview. "Her philosophy has its roots in Marxism, communism, socialism, extreme liberalism—she calls it progressivism—versus mine, which is rooted in free-market conservatism."

Needless to say Baldwin, who does not support government ownership of the means of production, is not a Marxist, a socialist, or a communist. And it's especially sad to see a Republican candidate equating progressivism with communism in Wisconsin, a birthplace and longtime stronghold of the progressive movement. Robert La Follette, a leading progressive Republican, was Wisconsin's governor from 1901 to 1906 and one of its senators from 1906 until 1925. LaFollette was succeeded in the Senate by his son, "Young Bob," who served until 1946, when he lost a GOP primary to the infamous red-hunter Joseph McCarthy. Here's a nice explanation of progressivism from the Wisconsin Historical Society:

Progressive Republicans... believed that the business of government was to serve the people. They sought to restrict the power of corporations when it interfered with the needs of individual citizens. The Progressive Movement appealed to citizens who wanted honest government and moderate economic reforms that would expand democracy and improve public morality... In Wisconsin, La Follette developed the techniques and ideas that made him a nationwide symbol of Progressive reform and made the state an emblem of progressive experimentation. The Wisconsin Idea, as it came to be called, was that efficient government required control of institutions by the voters rather than special interests, and that the involvement of specialists in law, economics, and social and natural sciences would produce the most effective government.

The state historical society's site has lots more on progressivism and Wisconsin history, including many primary source documents. Perhaps Hovde should familiarize himself with it.

MoJo to UCLA: Release the Milken Documents!

| Wed Jun. 20, 2012 6:30 AM EDT

Last August, the University of California-Los Angeles announced that it had accepted a $10 million gift from Lowell Milken, a key figure in the junk bonds and savings and loan scandals of the 1980s, to launch a "Lowell Milken Institute for Business Law and Policy." The University did not disclose that Milken, who is among the richest people in the world, has been banned for life from the securities industry. It also did not mention that Lowell's brother and business partner, Michael Milken, was jailed on multiple federal felony counts related to his work at Drexel Burnham Lambert, a now-defunct investment bank where Lowell also worked. Lowell was Michael's "closest confidant and adviser" at Drexel, the Los Angeles Times reported at the time.

Like the University's press release, initial coverage of the Milken's donation from the Daily Bruinthe Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, and the Los Angeles Daily News also neglected to mention his past. 

On August 18, the week after the donation was announced, I reported on Milken's history. The New York Times and other outlets picked up the story a few days later. When I first learned about the Milken gift, I asked a Mother Jones intern, Lauren Ellis, to file a document request with UCLA under the California Open Records Law. We asked for documents and emails related to the Milken deal and, crucially, the donor agreement between Milken and the university.

On October 5, UCLA finally responded, providing two letters from UCLA officials thanking Milken for his gift. The university refused to disclose the donor agreement or any other documents, arguing that it needed to protect "the personal privacy of its donors" and that releasing any documents beyond the two letters would "bring about a chilling effect on UCLA's Foundation, in that the personal privacy of its donors, prospective donors, and those who volunteer their time to the Foundation would no longer be protected." As Madeleine Buckingham, the CEO of Mother Jones, noted in a letter to UCLA last week, California courts have rejected both of these arguments for withholding information about donations to public universities. 

We believe that UCLA's decision to withhold the Milken documents represents a violation of California open records laws. You can read the letter (and our full argument) below:

 
Mon Jul. 27, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
Mon Jul. 27, 2009 11:41 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 27, 2009 10:09 AM EDT
Fri Jul. 24, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 23, 2009 8:51 AM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 4:20 PM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 3:53 PM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 2:38 PM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 2:20 PM EDT
Wed Jul. 22, 2009 1:42 PM EDT
Tue Jul. 21, 2009 10:27 AM EDT
Tue Jul. 21, 2009 9:25 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 20, 2009 12:56 PM EDT
Mon Jul. 20, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
Mon Jul. 20, 2009 11:04 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 20, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
Fri Jul. 17, 2009 10:19 AM EDT
Fri Jul. 17, 2009 9:48 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 16, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
Thu Jul. 16, 2009 11:41 AM EDT
Tue Jul. 14, 2009 1:56 PM EDT
Tue Jul. 14, 2009 11:14 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 13, 2009 10:54 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 13, 2009 10:36 AM EDT
Fri Jul. 10, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 9, 2009 4:44 PM EDT
Tue Jul. 7, 2009 9:24 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 2, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 2, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
Wed Jul. 1, 2009 9:29 AM EDT
Tue Jun. 30, 2009 1:51 PM EDT
Tue Jun. 30, 2009 12:25 PM EDT
Tue Jun. 30, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
Mon Jun. 29, 2009 12:07 PM EDT
Mon Jun. 29, 2009 10:29 AM EDT
Fri Jun. 26, 2009 11:07 AM EDT