Tasneem Raja, Interactive Editor

Tasneem Raja

Interactive Editor

Tasneem Raja is MoJo's Interactive Editor. She specializes in web app production, interactive graphics, and user interface design. Before joining Mother Jones, she was an interactive producer at The Bay Citizen. Before crossing over to the dark side, she was a features reporter and copyeditor at The Chicago Reader.

Get my RSS |

Fox News Asks Miss America About Those Racist Tweets

| Wed Sep. 18, 2013 2:49 PM EDT
Nina Davuluri
Nina Davuluri, Miss America 2013 Prensa International Miss America/Ho

I felt terrible for Nina Davuluri this week after she was crowned Miss America 2013, because I knew what was coming. Davuluri is the first Indian-American woman to win the pageant. The moment that special tiara was lowered onto her fabulously coiffed head, a barrage of hateful, outraged, resentful, and predictably inaccurate tweets and posts came hurtling her way, hundreds at a time. 

And my personal favorite: "WHEN WILL A WHITE WOMAN WIN #MISSAMERICA? Ever??!!" (The first nonwhite pageant winner was Norma Smallwood, of Cherokee descent, in 1926. It wouldn't happen again until 1984, when Vanessa Williams became the first black Miss America. Not a bad streak!)

Norma Smallwood
Norma Smallwood, Miss America 1926 Archival photo

Davuluri, whose parents are a software engineer and an OB/GYN from the north Indian state Andhra Pradesh, grew up in Oklahoma, and wants to become a cardiologist, went on Fox News this morning to talk about the hostility over her "race. . . and ethnicity. . . and everything," as Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy put it.

"It was an unfortunate experience, but for [each] negative tweet, there were dozens of positive remarks and support," said Davuluri. "A lot of that stemmed from ignorance, and that's why my platform is so timely right now."

Like presidents, Miss America candidates run on platforms. Davuluri's is "celebrating diversity through cultural competency." Cultural competency is that idea that everyone's responsible for sorting through their own cultural biases and trying harder when it comes to interacting with different sorts of folks. It comes up a lot in conversations about public education and health care, places where people from different backgrounds cross paths regularly and have to (or should) make it work.

"I have always viewed Miss America as the girl next door, but for me the girl next door's evolving as the diversity in America evolves," said Davuluri on Fox & Friends. "It's not who she was ten years ago, and she's not going to be the same person ten years down the road."

I cringe at the "girl next door" trope. I can't stand the Miss America contest for that matter, for reasons manymanymany smart people have articulated well elsewhere. But if someone's gonna go on Fox News and talk about being "Miss America," I prefer Nina Davuluri at the podium.

This was hardly the first time the racist side of Twitter flipped its presumably ultrablonde wig over a person of color showing up in a familiar media space. When the character of Rue from The Hunger Games, described as "dark skinned" in the book, was played by the young black actress Amandla Stenbergangry viewers took to Twitter to complain the movie had been "ruined." When Cheerios released a commercial in which a little girl adorably pours cereal all over her (black) sleeping dad's chest because her (white) mom said Cheerios is "heart healthy," the company had to disable YouTube comments because thousands of Americans think it's still 1966.

But all this trembling at the mere sight of little brown girls hasn't stopped the rapid colorization of our country. So why bother bringing Davuluri's attackers up at all? Because of the class-act performance she's been delivering in the face of so much ugliness. She's handling the ugly backlash with grace and poise, and working in some teachable moments along the way.

A few years ago, I made a promise to myself. I'd never again eat at an Indian restaurant where scenes of "traditional" Indian women were hung on the walls, rows and rows of doe-eyed women coyly hiding their smiles beneath gauzy scarves while performing traditional Indian activities such as pouring water from jugs and strumming wooden harps. I wouldn't have held it against Nina Davuluri if she'd stuck to the high road, refusing to dignify ugly attacks with a forceful response. But it means a lot to me that she's talking back.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Income Inequality Takes Manhattan—in 3-D!

| Wed Aug. 28, 2013 6:00 AM EDT

It's no surprise that income inequality in America is on the rise. Eighty percent of Americans have seen their incomes stagnate or fall since 1979. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent of earners is taking in more than ever before. We've made numerous charts to illustrate these disparities. But what if you could actually see the split between the superwealthy and everyone else?

Artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm's images of income in New York do just that. Using 2012 data from the mapping site ArcGIS, Lamm superimposed 3-D bars over photos of the cityscape to show the median net worth of census block groups. For example, "if one section had a net worth of $500,000, the height of the 3-D bar shape for that section was 5 cm. If one section had a net worth of $112,000, the height for that section was 1.12 cm." The resulting images clearly illustrate New York's status as one of the cities with the highest levels of income inequality.

Below, you can interact with the cityscape and the 3-D images for various neighborhoods.

Central Park. The Upper West Side is on the left.


The Financial District and the southern tip of Manhattan. (Note: Statue of Liberty has been added.)




Looking south over Manhattan from Englewood, New Jersey. Washington Heights is on the left. Central Park and Midtown are in the distance.


Midtown near the Trump Tower.


Above Brooklyn. The Financial District is on the left. Midtown is on the right.


Looking south toward the Upper West Side.


Above Central Park. The Upper East Side is on the left.


Above Yankee Stadium in the Bronx.

Thu Aug. 14, 2014 7:08 PM EDT
Fri Apr. 11, 2014 6:00 AM EDT
Wed Aug. 28, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Thu Aug. 22, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Tue Mar. 19, 2013 6:00 AM EDT
Sat Nov. 3, 2012 6:03 AM EDT
Mon Oct. 29, 2012 5:49 PM EDT
Wed Oct. 3, 2012 11:35 AM EDT
Wed Sep. 19, 2012 4:47 PM EDT
Fri May. 11, 2012 5:21 AM EDT
Fri Nov. 18, 2011 6:30 AM EST
Tue Nov. 15, 2011 8:24 PM EST
Sat Oct. 29, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Wed Oct. 26, 2011 6:05 PM EDT
Wed Oct. 26, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Sun Oct. 16, 2011 3:25 AM EDT
Sun Oct. 9, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Sun Sep. 11, 2011 6:00 AM EDT