«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Ancient Carvings of Nude Females Promote Wild Scientific ASSumptions
Okay, so maybe carvings of female figurines 15,000 years old reveal the preferred body shape for women was curvy with prominent buttocks. Or maybe, as the social anthropologist says, these were spiritual images (can’t they be the same thing?). But, jaysus, does anyone else ever get annoyed that no one ever even once seems to consider the possibility that maybe women carved these things?
From New Scientist magazine:
Romuald Schild of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw and colleagues have uncovered 30 flint female figurines from an ancient hunting site near the village of Wilczyce in central Poland. Hunter-gatherer men whittled these voluptuous female figures in their spare time.
Preserved in ice, the figurines were part of a haul of over 10,000 artifacts, including animal bones, beads made from Arctic fox teeth, and bone needles. The site is thought to have been an autumn or winter camp for a hunter-gatherer tribe.
All of the figurines were headless and had hugely exaggerated buttocks. Perhaps strangely, given their allure today, few of the figures had breasts.
This bottom-heavy shape ties in with northern European stone carvings and cave engravings of women from a similar period.
However, the figurines may have expressed more than just men's desires. "It is hard to say if this body shape was a social preference or if it represented a spiritual image," says Nanneke Redclift, a social anthropologist at University College London.
Comments
I cant believe that this is still a debate. Ancient carvings of goddess figures have been found and acknowledged by many informed scientists anthropologists and historians for generations! What do they think, that this was just a bunch of cavemen sitting around carving porn?! That is obviously a spiritual point where priests and, yes, priestesses gathered.
For an argument that a feminine point of view lies behind some early prehistoric
figurines see "Self-Representation in Upper Paleolithic Female Figurines in Current Anthropology, Vol 37(2), April 1996, pp.227-275.
Posted by: LeRoy McDermott on 03/14/07 at 1:02 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Eat Less, Save The World (1)
Pastor Leroy Jackson wrote:
What message does a church full of fat Christians send to ...
[more]
Prescription Drugs Are in our Drinking Water: What to do Now? (6)
Folkie wrote:
Look at the bright side in all this story... You can start...
[more]
Horse Virus Spreading to Humans (3)
sixthseal wrote:
Humankind will die...and those left standing, will be left...
[more]
How Long Will You Live? Depends Where You Live (4)
Pastor Bob wrote:
Nearly all religions have strong injunctions against glutt...
[more]
Commemorating Bush's Sh*t (18)
Sok To wrote:
This would be an insult to the sewerage plant, which is ac...
[more]
Beijing Spectators Risk Heart Attacks (3)
Roderick Ventura wrote:
Advice from docs #2:
Whenever possible, don't breathe. Inh...
[more]
Pharma Spends Twice as Much on Marketing as Research (1)
Shari wrote:
I wonder how much Pharmaceutical and Device Companies spen...
[more]
Bad Air Killing Eastern US (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
If McCain gets in it won't just be the bad air killing Eas...
[more]
African-Americans Genetically Prone to HIV, AIDS (23)
Lars, the Viking wrote:
P, let me clarify. If you are gay, the Nordic type is defi...
[more]
What's the Most Polluting Car? (28)
D S wrote:
D.Groover - obviously you didn't look too hard for a car w...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: janflora on 03/13/07 at 6:06 AM Respond