«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Biofuels Threaten Endangered Species
European Union green fuel targets will accelerate the destruction of rainforests in South-East Asia. Loss of habitat will threaten endangered species like the orangutan, reports the Sydney Morning Herald. In March, EU leaders set a target that biofuel (energy sources made from plant material) comprise 10 per cent of all Europe's transport fuels by 2020. Yet the European Commission admits that the effort to cut CO2 emissions may have the unintended result of speeding up the depletion of tropical rainforests and peatlands in South-East Asia. This would further increase, not reduce, global warming. If the target is met, European consumption of plant-based fuels will soar from about 3 million tons at present to more than 30 million tons in 2010, driving a boom in imports of cheap biofuels... How about using less? Of everything? Instead. --Julia Whitty
Comments
Biofuels have the potential to put rich people's driving (by the standard of anyone with a car is rich, but especially in areas like the US with our SUVs) in competition with both poor peoples' food and other environmental concerns.
There may be some biofuels that are not so bad, like ethanol from switchgrass. However, we must be very careful about how we implement use of biofuels. I'd personally stay away from them.
Electric cars running on the power generated by wind, solar, tidal, and other truly renewable sources will be much better than all biofuel options.
If the congress would pass HB 1009 and decriminalize agricultural hemp, there would be another source for biofuel and possibly ethanol. It's nuts to keep this 1937 law on the books.
Agricultural hemp is a source for food, fiber and fuel. It is also pest resistant. Cotton uses about 50% of the pesticides used in this country.
Posted by: Don Peterson on 05/02/07 at 1:41 PM Respond
Good point Don. And while they're at it, perhaps they could throw a little more reason into the law and decriminalize medical marijuana too.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 05/03/07 at 1:00 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
MoJo Nukes Convo: Stewart Brand's Take (3)
Mother Jones staff wrote:
The comment currently attributed to Brandi Adamski was ori...
[more]
MoJo Nukes Convo: Judith Lewis Highlights (15)
G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996 wrote:
'James' says,
Has anyone REALLY solved the nu...
[more]
FDA Approves Cloned Animals for Store Shelves (9)
barbie oyunları wrote:
It's getting to the point where I feel like if my kids are...
[more]
Pigs Spared Med School Surgeries (3)
RW wrote:
The last set of IRB seminars I sat in on left me with the ...
[more]
Let Them Eat Biofuel (5)
Lars, the Viking wrote:
Rod, look at history, whenever the economy changes there a...
[more]
Growing Up Nuclear: Author Kelly McMasters Tells Her Story (5)
Barry Wallace wrote:
Kelly, No Nukes, et al.
I am disappointed none of you hav...
[more]
Some Corals Survived A-Bombs, Others Didn't (1)
BlueBerry Pick'n wrote:
that is fascinating. I'd never *considered* coral at all....
[more]
Antarctic Sea Ice Increase: Fodder for Global Warming Skeptics? (23)
Ted wrote:
Ed in Mt. You are right. America is the Saudi Arabia of Co...
[more]
Cheaper, More Reliable Solar? (2)
wiseman wrote:
Solar Thermal kicks ass....
[more]
Bush's EPA Pollutes Science (1)
Elydog wrote:
What is the American word for "Lysenko"?
Do we have a fav...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 05/01/07 at 10:30 AM Respond