«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Taking Animals Out Of Laboratory Research
Pioneering work to reduce the use of animals in scientific research has received a major boost in the UK. The goal is to remove animals from laboratories altogether, reports the University of Nottingham. The FRAME (Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments) laboratory, designed to find effective alternatives to animal testing, has received $480,000 to expand and remodel. Researchers hope to develop cell and tissue cultures, computer modelling, cell and molecular biology, epidemiology and other methods, to supplant animals from medical research, while still maintaining crucial work to defeat diseases that affect millions of people. . . Good scientists. --JULIA WHITTY
Comments
This is great!! I've long been a believer that at least at the point at which we get to great apes, if not sooner, we should really just find human volunteers. I know it sounds somewhat speciesist. However, some animals are just so obviously intelligent that keeping them in laboratory conditions and deliberately giving them medical conditions is horribly unethical.
I'm not sure exactly where to draw the line between mice and chimps, but somewhere, there is a line at which we should not be doing medical experiments on the species. Jane Goodall, at a lecture, told a story of walking through a lab and seeing a chimp in a cage signing in ASL "help me" over and over, truly heartbreaking.
At some level, the species that will benefit will be willing to volunteer for the experiment. If this is not true, perhaps the experiment is not worth performing.
The type of technology mentioned here may remove the whole ethics issue by removing all animal test subjects. This would be wonderful. I hope it pans out.
OMFG, Misanthropic Scott, I think you broke my heart with that Goodall story & the chimp's ASL call for help...
Posted by: julia whitty on 06/27/07 at 11:13 AM Respond
Sorry Julia. It broke my heart too. I hope sharing such stories might be a way to spread memes that will prevent such occurrences in the future. As someone who has been lucky (and determined) enough to see great apes in the wild, I can tell you it's like looking in a mirror. I think it would be impossible for all but the extreme fundamentalist crowd to look at these animals and not see a close cousin.
At least if we could perform such medical tests on humans, the subjects would be volunteers, would like be either themselves the ones to benefit from the research or be close to someone who would and would not be traumatized by the experience. Or, at least they would not be any more traumatized than they already are by dealing with a difficult medical condition. Oh, and we probably wouldn't keep human subjects in cages.
That's why I say that by the time we're ready to do testing on apes, the species of ape we should be testing on is homo sapiens.
Perhaps this new technology can give us hope to end animal testing all together. I think that would be a wonderful thing. Let's hope it works out.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 06/28/07 at 4:39 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
MoJo Nukes Convo: Stewart Brand's Take (3)
Mother Jones staff wrote:
The comment currently attributed to Brandi Adamski was ori...
[more]
MoJo Nukes Convo: Judith Lewis Highlights (15)
G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996 wrote:
'James' says,
Has anyone REALLY solved the nu...
[more]
FDA Approves Cloned Animals for Store Shelves (9)
barbie oyunları wrote:
It's getting to the point where I feel like if my kids are...
[more]
Pigs Spared Med School Surgeries (3)
RW wrote:
The last set of IRB seminars I sat in on left me with the ...
[more]
Let Them Eat Biofuel (5)
Lars, the Viking wrote:
Rod, look at history, whenever the economy changes there a...
[more]
Growing Up Nuclear: Author Kelly McMasters Tells Her Story (5)
Barry Wallace wrote:
Kelly, No Nukes, et al.
I am disappointed none of you hav...
[more]
Some Corals Survived A-Bombs, Others Didn't (1)
BlueBerry Pick'n wrote:
that is fascinating. I'd never *considered* coral at all....
[more]
Antarctic Sea Ice Increase: Fodder for Global Warming Skeptics? (23)
Ted wrote:
Ed in Mt. You are right. America is the Saudi Arabia of Co...
[more]
Cheaper, More Reliable Solar? (2)
wiseman wrote:
Solar Thermal kicks ass....
[more]
Bush's EPA Pollutes Science (1)
Elydog wrote:
What is the American word for "Lysenko"?
Do we have a fav...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 06/26/07 at 6:45 AM Respond