«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Electric Shocks Prompt "Impulsive" and "Primitive" Side of Brain
A recent study coming out of Britain finds that when the threat of electric shock looms near, humans shift from the prefrontal cortex—the part of the brain that governs rational thought—in order to engage the "fight or flight" part of the brain. In the study (published in its entirety yesterday in Science), volunteers played a game similar to Pac-Man, in which they had to evade a predator. When the computer predator caught them, they would receive a shock to the hand. Researchers found that as the predator closed in, the threat of imminent punishment moved the player's thinking from rational to impulsive and primitive.
This study makes me wonder, then, how autistic and mentally retarded students—profiled in "School of Shock," a feature from the current issue of Mother Jones—react to the constant threat of punitive electric shocks. If what the British study suggests is true and the threat of electric shock makes people less rational, I'd assume the shocks would also make it harder for autistic and developmentally disabled students to reason out why they're being punished. And if fear and the threat of electric shocks increase incidents of impulsive behavior, it seems like a vicious and terribly inefficient system to me, considering these impulsive acts are the very behaviors students are often punished for in the first place.
In addition, a pervasive environment of fear at school (described in detail in our article) would also make academics more difficult because students are using the "fight or flight" part of their brain rather than the prefrontal cortex, which rules abstract reasoning and complex decision-making.
Comments
Of course this is just the issue. We live along a continuum of love vs. fear. Fear tends to banish reason and invite impulse. Love tends to embrace reason and invite considered action.
A literary treatment of this issue is available in Herbert's Dune series, where one's status as a human is tested by the ability to endure pain without pulling one's hand from a box that simulates intense pain and destruction when one knows that no actual damage is being done in spite of the intensity of the pain.
When we understand the kind of self evident conclusions that arise from the kind of pseudo-scientific demonstration described above (usually involving clueless undergraduates) we can begin to understand how people conditioned to fear can end up becoming sadistic. The pain of their victims tends to decouple their conditioned response to anticipated pain. If they are the one causing the pain, the unreasoning brain concludes that they can not be the one to experience it.
This is also the source of the biblical admonition to love one's enemy. Under the influence of love hormones, in contrast to fear hormones, one can maintain ones conscious awareness and the full power of the frontal lobes and hence increase one's chances of escape or mastery of the situation.
Please check out this website.
http://www.mindfreedom.org/
Posted by: Jow Piontkowski on 08/27/07 at 1:06 PM Respond
we all know that shock teraphy has its good use. we hear it being used every day in emergency rooms.
to treat such conditions as the ones mentioned in the school of shock... who came out with such an incoherent idea?
Posted by: Dr.Q on 08/28/07 at 2:20 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Forecast for Solar: Cloudy (5)
Otto wrote:
breezi, Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
Über alles in...
[more]
America's Coral Reefs Declining (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
The decline so far will be nothing in comparison to the de...
[more]
Smart Energy = No More Wall Warts (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
I had no idea they used that much energy; do they all use ...
[more]
Making Fake Stuff Look More Real (5)
steve wrote:
IT would be a nice touch if they could come up with someth...
[more]
Snake Sidewinds Energy from the Sea (3)
Bert wrote:
How about a Big Giant Toilet Bowl float instead? Big truss...
[more]
Farms Kill Frogs (3)
cover me with blanket wrote:
This is hardly a subject to laugh about. It is frightenin...
[more]
Why Miles Per Gallon Suck (3)
Nancy wrote:
I seem to remember that the "Car Talk" brothers had a simi...
[more]
Clean Energy Leaps Forward (1)
Patrick wrote:
The exponential growth of green industry investment makes ...
[more]
Everglades Wins Big (10)
breezi wrote:
Lantern Bearer is so right. And, although I know it's ton...
[more]
Scientist on Warming: "We're Toast" (2)
Jill wrote:
Hanson is a false prophet, just like Al Gore who is such a...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: herb on 08/27/07 at 1:06 PM Respond