«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
California's Healthcare Battle In A Nutshell
Leave it to the Washington Post to give the best synopsis I've read of the battle currently underway in California between the Republican governor (Schwarzenegger) and the Democratic legislature over efforts to create a statewide healthcare plan. Though California hasn't actually led the way in this kind of initiative (look to Hawaii and, much later, Massachusetts), its decision—due in three weeks—may well set the agenda for other states and presidential candidates to follow.
The urgency here, reports the Post, is that Californians are less likely to be covered than residents of 45 other states, and those who are covered are concerned it's not going to be there for them when they need it. . . [sure is a familiar feeling in my world, read: self-employed and paying scary, ever-increasing percentage of meager earnings for dubiously useable health insurance. . .] Read here for examples of why that is.
From the WP:
Under both the governor's proposal and the Democrats', employers would have to spend a minimum amount on health care for workers or pay money into a state-run purchasing pool through which people could buy private insurance. But the employer's fee under the Democrats would be higher—7.5 percent of payroll, compared with 4 percent of payroll under Schwarzenegger's plan. Another difference: The governor would require physicians to pay 2 percent of their revenue to the state, and hospitals 4 percent, to help finance the new system. The Democrats' plan has no such charges. The governor would require everyone to have a basic level of health insurance; the Democrats have no individual mandate. Both plans would expand public programs and subsidized coverage for low-income families. Neither is cheap. Schwarzenegger's plan would cost $12 billion annually and cover an estimated 4.1 million people; the Democrats' would cost $8.3 billion and cover 3.4 million.
Let's hope they reach a tenable consensus and trigger tons o' momentum on a national agenda. Once again, Californians, have more power than they realize. . . JULIA WHITTY
Comments
This is Darwinism in action. The strong will survive to reproduce and the weak will perish. This will make the humans stronger. Life is a struggle of the fittest.
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
African-Americans Genetically Prone to HIV, AIDS (17)
M Young wrote:
That response was to the Viking chap. ...
[more]
Commemorating Bush's Sh*t (4)
Zack wrote:
San Francisco should build something for Nancy Pelosi; alo...
[more]
Smart Energy = No More Wall Warts (6)
Dan Mortenson wrote:
Late commenting, but --
Dan, most devices that use power ...
[more]
Ouch: Climate Change Means More Kidney Stones (8)
Tom Edgar wrote:
Usually I wouldn't respond re
my physical experiences BUT...
[more]
What's the Most Polluting Car? (26)
magualua wrote:
All this bitching about suv's, truck's and hybrid's, I'm n...
[more]
The Cutest Rehab (8)
Julia Whitty wrote:
Here's a radical suggestion, gentle readers: follow the em...
[more]
Ice Blocking Canada's Seal Hunt (54)
The Professor wrote:
"Support The Hunt", Canadians are suppose to be well manne...
[more]
Sea Level Rise Twice As High as Current Projections (2)
Justin wrote:
You should get a job ghost-writing for Michael Crichton. ...
[more]
Dead Zone Overkill (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
As it says in one of your sources:
It's the sixth year the...
[more]
21st-Century Land Grab (2)
JG wrote:
FT: It's your imagination. This whole flap (yes, even on M...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Horst G. on 08/26/07 at 7:46 AM Respond