«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Clean Up the Coal Plants, Then Clean Out the Fridge

While the filthy coal industry touts its far-off "clean coal" technology to help keep federal subsidies flowing, perhaps there's a simpler solution to the emissions and toxins these plants belch. A Texas company called Skyonic has developed a process it claims can reduce smokestack carbon by up to 90 percent by transforming the C02 into solid NaHCO3, better known by the brand name Arm & Hammer. Hey, baking soda from coal waste! Great idea, especially if—as the company claims—the stuff comes out food-grade clean. (Even so, I think I'll just use mine to eliminate fridge odors.)
The process, which is now being tested on a pilot scale in Texas, is driven by heat from the waste gases. It involves an input of sodium hydroxide (lye), which is produced on-site, and produces as byproducts hydrogen and chlorine gases, which could be sold at a profit along with the baking soda, the company says.
Skyonic CEO Joe David Jones told ZDNET, where you can read more on this, that his company's "SkyMine" technology also eliminates 97 percent of the heavy metals and most of the acids and nitrogen compounds, which would eliminate the need for pricey smokestack scrubbers. The company is working on a full-scale system it hopes to install in 2009 that would, it says, absorb the waste output of a large (500MW) plant—which includes about 338,000 tons of carbon annually.
Sounds almost too good to be true; pie-in-the-SkyMine, you might say. Still, if it pans out, there'll be plenty of baking soda for that pie, and one less reason to hate the coal industry. 'Course, there is a little matter of blowing the tops off mountains. ...
Comments
Not just mountaintop removal, mercury as well. I think coal is still a very bad idea all around. However, fitting existing fossil fuel plants of all types with this device can definitely be a help.
Will baking soda be our newest toxic waste? Clearly there will be more than we have uses for. Perhaps it will be safer to bury that than CO2 though.
Lastly, where are we getting all the Lye? Can we produce it from desalination plants powered by wind and solar?
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Snake Sidewinds Energy from the Sea (2)
Trollstein wrote:
Energy is the single most powerful commodity on Earth.
We ...
[more]
Farms Kill Frogs (3)
cover me with blanket wrote:
This is hardly a subject to laugh about. It is frightenin...
[more]
Why Miles Per Gallon Suck (3)
Nancy wrote:
I seem to remember that the "Car Talk" brothers had a simi...
[more]
Making Fake Stuff Look More Real (2)
Fair Trade wrote:
The people dumb enough to still think it's acceptable to b...
[more]
Clean Energy Leaps Forward (1)
Patrick wrote:
The exponential growth of green industry investment makes ...
[more]
Forecast for Solar: Cloudy (4)
breezi wrote:
First of all, other countries (e.g.,Germany) are years ahe...
[more]
Everglades Wins Big (10)
breezi wrote:
Lantern Bearer is so right. And, although I know it's ton...
[more]
Scientist on Warming: "We're Toast" (2)
Jill wrote:
Hanson is a false prophet, just like Al Gore who is such a...
[more]
Prescription Drugs Are in our Drinking Water: What to do Now? (5)
Ally wrote:
So drinking water can cause you to finally end up with an ...
[more]
Bush Administration to California: Eff You (2)
treehugger wrote:
Jeez, the things people talk about while out duck hunting....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 11/29/07 at 10:01 AM Respond