«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Who's Most at Risk from Climate Change?
The answer, by region: the eastern US in North America; China, Bangladesh and Myanmar in Asia; western Sahel and southwestern nations in Africa; Brazil in South America; Russia, Scandinavia, and the Mediterranean nations, including France, Italy and Spain, in Europe. This according to a new study from Purdue University and the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Italy that goes beyond the physical aspects of climate change—changes in temperature, sea-level, and precipitation—to examine socioeconomic side-effects worldwide. The study forecasts that the merger of climatic and socioeconomic variables will trigger lopsided responses.
"Patterns emerge that you wouldn't recognize from just looking at either climatic or socioeconomic conditions," [said Noah Diffenbaugh, lead author]. "For example, China has a relatively moderate expected climate change. However, when you combine that with the fact that it has the second largest economy in the world, a substantial poverty rate and a large population, it creates one of the largest combined exposures on the planet. We see similar effects in other parts of the world, including India and the United States, which also have relatively moderate expected climate change. So it's where the socioeconomic and climatic variables intersect that is the key."
The research will be published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent. You can read from her new book, The Fragile Edge, and other writings, here.
Comments
Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology.
The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scare-mongering.
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Sarah Palin: Why Can't Polar Bears Just Leave Those Poor Oil Companies Alone? (35)
Horst W. wrote:
GP Franks, I am not concerned about the "Jesus Freaks" of ...
[more]
What's the Most Polluting Car? (36)
Lucy Lu wrote:
People should have one meat-free day a week if they want t...
[more]
Hello Sarah Palin, Goodbye ANWR (3)
Lori Buel wrote:
RIGHT ON, SISTER!!...
[more]
African-Americans Genetically Prone to HIV, AIDS (29)
Dr. Who wrote:
Researchers found that people who live in lands conquered ...
[more]
Wind Turbines Decimate Bats (14)
Robert wrote:
Many before me are saying that the turbines would affect w...
[more]
Listen Up, Pandas, You Need to Fight (15)
Ashley wrote:
I LOVE THE PIC OF THE PANDA ITS SOOOOOOOOOOOOO CUTE...
[more]
Elephants & Tigers Get Room To Breathe (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
We rarely get to read good news about endangered animals a...
[more]
Lead Shot Kills Long After The Bullet Stops (3)
Green Lady wrote:
Andy Griffith(aka Sheriff), thinking is not what a true be...
[more]
Prescription Drugs Are in our Drinking Water: What to do Now? (8)
Satellite tv wrote:
[...] [...]
...
[more]
Living Green in Denmark (5)
North Cyprus wrote:
How you combine all of these usuful information in a uniqu...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: His Grace on 12/12/07 at 12:50 PM Respond