«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
The Nobel Laureates Have Spoken: We Need a Presidential Science Debate
Eleven Nobel laureates, nine congressmen, multiple university presidents, and the heads of numerous science organizations have signed a petition calling for a presidential science debate this year. "Science and engineering have driven half the nation’s growth in GDP over the last half-century, and lie at the center of many of the major policy and economic challenges the next president will face," says Alan Leshner, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "We feel that a presidential debate on science would be helpful to America’s national political dialogue."
It's not surprising that the candidates haven't jumped at the idea. Global-warming- and evolution-denying Republicans would look hilarious in such a forum, but even Democrats might worry about making a gaffe while weighing in on debates that are normally left to the experts. Still, it seems like an idea Democrats should take seriously. By signaling to voters that science is important, it would drum up support for the party's ideas, and, more fundamentally, lay out how post-Middle-Ages worldview translates into superior leadership.
Comments
How about this? We just convince one from each side of the fence to sit down and TALK about science; what do they know, how do they apply it, screw stem cells what do they know about metaphysics? Prolly too much to ask that they'd be smokin' a bowl over the entire session. Ahh, feels good just to imagine it.
I wouldn't necessarily expect politicians themselves to debate scientific ideas or conclusions. In fact I think that would be counter productive. The politicians aren't qualified to do the debating and the public certainly isn't qualified to make judgments about the validity of the arguments.
What I would like to see is politicians, and the media, committing to depoliticizing science. Scientists and the scientific method should be respected by the public. Having politicians pledge to do so would be a good step in the right direction.
Posted by: RhapsodyInGlue on 01/26/08 at 6:01 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
African-Americans Genetically Prone to HIV, AIDS (17)
M Young wrote:
That response was to the Viking chap. ...
[more]
Commemorating Bush's Sh*t (4)
Zack wrote:
San Francisco should build something for Nancy Pelosi; alo...
[more]
Smart Energy = No More Wall Warts (6)
Dan Mortenson wrote:
Late commenting, but --
Dan, most devices that use power ...
[more]
Ouch: Climate Change Means More Kidney Stones (8)
Tom Edgar wrote:
Usually I wouldn't respond re
my physical experiences BUT...
[more]
What's the Most Polluting Car? (26)
magualua wrote:
All this bitching about suv's, truck's and hybrid's, I'm n...
[more]
The Cutest Rehab (8)
Julia Whitty wrote:
Here's a radical suggestion, gentle readers: follow the em...
[more]
Ice Blocking Canada's Seal Hunt (54)
The Professor wrote:
"Support The Hunt", Canadians are suppose to be well manne...
[more]
Sea Level Rise Twice As High as Current Projections (2)
Justin wrote:
You should get a job ghost-writing for Michael Crichton. ...
[more]
Dead Zone Overkill (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
As it says in one of your sources:
It's the sixth year the...
[more]
21st-Century Land Grab (2)
JG wrote:
FT: It's your imagination. This whole flap (yes, even on M...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Jordan on 01/24/08 at 1:03 PM Respond