«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
China Exports 33% Of CO2 Footprint
One-third of China's carbon footprint comes from producing goods for export. That's up from an estimate of 25 percent only 10 months ago.
Now a new paper in Energy Policy say China's export emissions equaled 1.7 billion tons of CO2 in 2005. That's 6% of total global emissions. The same as Germany, France, and the UK combined.
Many of the industries producing these emissions make electronics for the rich world. Which gets sticky when you realize that international policy penalizes the producer country, not the consumer. China, understandably, thinks that's wrong, reports New Scientist:
"In some measure, it makes sense if people buy goods and become liable for the emissions generated when the goods are produced," says Benito Müller of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, UK. "They will certainly be more choosy about what they buy."
Even Chinese consumers.
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent, lecturer, and 2008 winner of the Kiriyama Prize and the John Burroughs Medal Award.
Comments
Among centrists and liberals, it is fashionable to complaint and exclaim about China's carbon footprint.
They can now blame China for global warming, intead of looking at the US.
However, as these figures bear out, the U.S. and other nations have just exported our carbon production to another country. Tidy. It is not just a Chinese responsibility, obviously ... U.S. and U.S. -RELATED carbon is still the biggest footprint in the world.
No need to worry. The WTO is dead. The deal hit a fatal snag last week when the United States refused to allow China and India a loophole that would have protected farmers from a sudden surge in imports.
The recriminations started almost immediately, with each side blaming the other for what has been widely regarded as a disaster. On Wednesday China blamed "selfish" wealthy Western nations for the failure to free up global trade, while Japan pointed the finger at China and India for focusing on their own interests instead of considering the global economy.
The reality is that a WTO deal is now unlikely for years to come. The crestfallen Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim said on Tuesday that it could even be three or four years before the talks are revived.
In the long term the debacle in Geneva marks a break of immense importance. The rules governing trade will become more inscrutable, because agreements between individual states will replace the framework that had been globally accepted up to now. The WTO will lose its influence as the referee in disputes. The price will only gradually be perceived by businesses, but it will be high. The trade system is losing the dependability that exporters urgently require.Above all the failure of the WTO talks reflects the changing power relations in the world. Gone are the days when the US and Europe could set the tone and largely draw up the world trade agreements amongst themselves. China and India took a tough stance. They fight hard for their interests and only support free trade when it suits them. The old industrial powers will slowly realize the bitter truth of this. Geneva was just a foretaste.
Posted by: Thurston H. on 08/05/08 at 3:30 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Making Iraq Fertile (2)
researcher wrote:
let americans pay for it.
wanna bet how much they hate us...
[more]
Brazil Changes on Climate Change (4)
Jimmy wrote:
I took care of my own guilt by getting a bunch of free car...
[more]
Steve Irwin, Illegal Whaling Ship Hunter? (11)
Thundersalmon wrote:
Steve Irwin never went about using acts of terrorism to sp...
[more]
More Genetic Tests: Still Creepy (2)
dan wrote:
Well said Michael. I'd also note for every LaBron James (...
[more]
Charge Your Cellphone By Talking (3)
Bill Moore wrote:
I think we should harness all of the hot air coming out of...
[more]
Obama's (And Our) Clean-Coal Blues (5)
Scott wrote:
The media is not the last word on all things green. Two e...
[more]
WTF? ExxonMobil Funds Research—By An Astrophysicist—On Polar Bears And Climate Change (4)
Tina wrote:
As of now, the Minister of the Environment has asked Envir...
[more]
Listen Up, Pandas, You Need to Fight (17)
ziggxzagg wrote:
i totally agree,
ive been asking for a panda for the last ...
[more]
Huntington vs. Burlington: How to Grow a Healthy City (20)
yerbatera wrote:
Great story! Have lived in both urban liberal enclaves & ...
[more]
All-Expenses-Paid India Vacation, Courtesy of Your Health Insurer (7)
fixedknee wrote:
I agree that doctors' bills are high. Part of the problem ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Elyman on 07/29/08 at 12:29 PM Respond