«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Shipwrecks Wreck Reefs
Shipwrecks on coral reefs appear to increase the invasion of alien species. A US Geological Survey study finds unwanted species completely overtake the shipwreck and eventually the surrounding reef, eliminating all native corals and dramatically decreasing the diversity of other reef organisms.
Sadly, we've been deliberately sinking ships for decades, imagining they might "anchor" healthy new reef communities. But the new study published in the open access journal PloS One is the first to document how manmade structures rapidly destroy the coral community.
The study was conducted at Palmyra Atoll National Wildlife Refuge in the central Pacific. This remote area has seen little human activity since WWII. Scientists began surveying a 1991 shipwreck in 2004. Since then, they've observed exponentially increasing populations of a anemonelike animal, Rhodactis howesii, around the wreck. The densities decrease with distance from the ship. Although Rhodactis are rare to absent in other parts of the atoll, they're also populous around buoys.
The exact relationship between shipwreck and Rhodactis is unknown. But one possibility is that iron leaching from the ship (and mooring buoys' chains) somehow promotes the growth of R. howesii. Given the sheer speed of ecosystem changes, the researchers doubt that even the removal of the shipwreck will halt the alien invasion.
Will this be our epitaph? Veering from one tragic phase shift to another. The ship that sank was a longliner—among the most horrifically destructive technologies ever invented. . . and still deadly, even in death.
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent, lecturer, and 2008 winner of the Kiriyama Prize and the John Burroughs Medal Award.
Comments
Why are we perpetually surprised that nature tends to get it right on its own; and human intervention tends to mess it up...
Deliberate shipwreaks are seldom made directly on existing coral reefs, and they greatly increase people's ability to experience and enjoy the underwater world. Honestly guys, pick your battles, there are more serious issues out there and creating a bummer out of what is basically a positive thing is only going to lose you readers.
Posted by: Slocko 99 on 08/25/08 at 8:39 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Making Iraq Fertile (2)
researcher wrote:
let americans pay for it.
wanna bet how much they hate us...
[more]
Brazil Changes on Climate Change (4)
Jimmy wrote:
I took care of my own guilt by getting a bunch of free car...
[more]
Steve Irwin, Illegal Whaling Ship Hunter? (11)
Thundersalmon wrote:
Steve Irwin never went about using acts of terrorism to sp...
[more]
More Genetic Tests: Still Creepy (2)
dan wrote:
Well said Michael. I'd also note for every LaBron James (...
[more]
Charge Your Cellphone By Talking (3)
Bill Moore wrote:
I think we should harness all of the hot air coming out of...
[more]
Obama's (And Our) Clean-Coal Blues (5)
Scott wrote:
The media is not the last word on all things green. Two e...
[more]
WTF? ExxonMobil Funds Research—By An Astrophysicist—On Polar Bears And Climate Change (4)
Tina wrote:
As of now, the Minister of the Environment has asked Envir...
[more]
Listen Up, Pandas, You Need to Fight (17)
ziggxzagg wrote:
i totally agree,
ive been asking for a panda for the last ...
[more]
Huntington vs. Burlington: How to Grow a Healthy City (20)
yerbatera wrote:
Great story! Have lived in both urban liberal enclaves & ...
[more]
All-Expenses-Paid India Vacation, Courtesy of Your Health Insurer (7)
fixedknee wrote:
I agree that doctors' bills are high. Part of the problem ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Fair Trade on 08/23/08 at 3:53 AM Respond