MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

iWaste

Commentary: Ten thousand songs in your pocket. Ten thousand years in a landfill.

March/April 2007 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


good for you. The lesson of how vhs made Betamax obsolete in the '80s is still part of your folk memory, so you didn't buy a Blu-ray or hd dvd player last December. As a video refusenik, unsure which format would win the dvd wars, you demonstrated a sophisticated appreciation of product obsolescence and decided not to buy a new device until you knew it would play movies for years to come. Or perhaps you're still smarting from being burned again and again by audio obsolescence: Albums went to eight-tracks, and then to cassettes, before CDs were introduced. With each change, audiophiles repurchased the classics.

These days, the champion of audio obsolescence is Apple, which successfully combined its iPod with a unique digital format (aac). By embracing a non-MP3 format, Apple locked you into its world. Now, when your iPod breaks, you have a library of music that you can't use on other players. You have to buy another iPod. Enjoy your music for as long as your iPods lasts. Apple says that will be for years; for us nitpickers that means about 13 months.

Yes, the secret is out. After 13 months of heavy use, the lithium-ion battery of the iPod can lose more than half of its functionality. You'll find that even though you recharge more often, your iPod can fade out by the end of a long day. Simply put, even though an iPod can cost you $350, these digital music players are designed to be disposable.

Then why not get a new battery? Good idea. But Apple deliberately seals the battery inside the iPod. Replacement costs $65 (a new 1-gig iPod shuffle costs $79), takes several weeks, and worst of all—because the new battery comes in a refurbished and wiped-clean iPod—you'll lose all your songs.

Or you can say, "Screw Apple," opt for an aftermarket battery kit, and repair your own machine. It's easy, cheaper, and more fun than having Apple fix it. The kit from Sonnet Inc. (sonnettech.com) is especially useful. For $19.95 it includes a special iPod opening tool, but best of all it comes with a dvd showing exactly what to do. If you're not into do-it-yourself, you could send your iPod to any one of the outfits such as Small Dog Electronics (smalldog.com) that repair or resell these digital throwaways.

But battery decline is only one way that Apple encourages speedy obsolescence. Another is by introducing spiffy new models shortly after you've acquired the latest thing. December's iPod looks a little duller since the introduction of the iPhone, doesn't it? The screen is probably already scratched. Time, then, to let you know about the three models of next-generation iPods that, scuttlebutt says, will be available this year. As Steve Jobs said, "If you...want the latest and greatest...you have to buy a new iPod at least once a year." Yes, this is from the same man who wants you to know that "Apple has a really strong environmental policy."

The fact that Apple's cofounder and ceo seems positively gleeful about the amount of waste his product generates is alarming, since the iPod is designed to be all too easy to throw away. Of course, if you live near an Apple store, you can recycle your obsolete iPod for free. But then, the iPod is only one small aspect of an avalanche of electronic waste that will soon overwhelm America.

Microsoft's recent release of its memory-hogging, graphics-intense Vista operating system will effectively render many existing PCs obsolete. Industry analysts say that 95 percent of the household PCs in Great Britain won't be able to run all of Vista's bells and whistles, and that only a third of laptops currently sold will be able to meet even its minimum requirements. Sooner or later they will all be junked. By 2009, 300 million analog TVs in the United States will also become obsolete when America's broadcast signal format changes to digital. (Sure, you will be able to get a set-top converter box—yet another gadget—but marketers are salivating at the chance to persuade you to buy a new TV.) Meanwhile, in 2007 the 3 billionth cell phone—with its life span of about 18 months—will roll off an assembly line somewhere in Asia. In this context, the disposability of the iPod and the fight among manufacturers over dvd formats seem irresponsible if not criminally negligent. iPods are crammed with lead, mercury, and flame retardant, and the 70 million already sold represent a sizable amount of toxic chemicals that seep through landfills and contaminate groundwater. Electronic waste accounts for 2 percent of America's trash in landfills but 70 percent of its toxic garbage. In 2003 alone, 3 million tons of e-waste were generated in the United States.

The good news is that Americans are reacting to the greedy tactics of force-fed obsolescence in the best possible way. Few people bought a new-format dvd player for Christmas, and disillusioned consumers are fighting e-waste. Last December, Greenpeace activists bathed Apple's Fifth Avenue New York store in green floodlights to publicize the group's "Green My Apple" campaign that is aimed at shaming the iPod manufacturer into becoming more environmentally responsible.

My best advice is to sit on your money for six months and think about what you really need. It will cost you at least $200 to replace your iPod, $1,000 or more to replace your PC, and between $400 and $1,500 to upgrade your current dvd player. Take that money and buy something durable, something that will increase in value. Shares in a company like Apple might do the trick. There's no planned obsolescence for rapacious capitalism.

Giles Slade is the author of Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

too long i didn't read it
Posted by:bobMay 26, 2007 7:48:49 PMRespond ^
This is so true. What is worse is that america, Japan, and other big countries in Europe export their e-waster overseas illegally. The toxic hazardous materials found in electronics seep into landfills and contaminate rivers and ground water. If recycled, it is done so in an unhealthy manner by incineration or open fire burning. Side effects of exposure to these harmful toxins are sickness, deformalities, skin conditions, respiratory problems, cancer, or even death. The people in these communities have no health or environmental standards manitoring these practices, nor the healthcare facilities to deal with them. Most e-waste cannot be tracked and poor communities in China and India now have landfills flooding their communities and neighborhoods. Do you really need to buy that new ipod????
Posted by:LaceyMay 29, 2007 4:49:51 AMRespond ^
absolute rubbish. AAC is not unique. Stop spouting forth inaccurate facts to support your flawed arguement. Also, Apple has product cycles like evey other manufacturer, and , because they like to be market leaders (no shame there) , they release new hardware as soon as the new technology makes it commercially possible. I suppose you think the iPhone is unique too and totally proprietary and locks out all Windows users and secretly steals all your personal data for Steve Jobs to look at.
Posted by:eightJune 19, 2007 12:09:10 AMRespond ^
Just wanted to dispel some of the AAC myths you are touting. AAC is not unique to Apple, it is actually part of the MPEG4 standard. Look up MPEG, it stands for Motion Picture Experts Group and has nearly 350 member organizations. By the way, AAC files actually work on several audio playback devices, including the zune. But, yeah, eWaste is bad.
Posted by:adoneJune 22, 2007 6:10:08 AMRespond ^
Usual greentard drivel. Would you like to return to the stone age and wipe our bottoms with our hands and stones instead of paper, because the production of toilet paper causes environmental damage? I have yet to see Apple salesmen holding guns to dumb consumers heads forcing them to buy iPods.. Only rapacious capitalism will enable the poor to get rich and thus enjoy a better, longer life. Not sustainable development, whatever that means.
Posted by:Greentard drivelJune 28, 2007 10:28:25 AMRespond ^
Great article. The likely life of a product and the cost of disposal should be considered at build. Would Apple build a longer lasting less polluting product if they had to pay to recycle all their iPods at the end of there useful life?
Posted by:www.pulltheplug.co.ukJuly 20, 2007 4:20:30 AMRespond ^
im with bob, took too long
Posted by:maxSeptember 25, 2007 4:20:24 AMRespond ^
my ipod is getting a bit like that...battery dies out faster these days. first i thot its my fault but thanx to ur article i know that its apple's fault..
Posted by:AbhinavOctober 26, 2007 6:14:24 AMRespond ^
throw away consumables are so short sighted. im personally disgusted at how poorly designed apples products are in terms of user servicability. batteries are one of the worst environmental hazards in the world, and im really saddened by how much battery waste is contributed yearly just by the i-pods. after spending 1000's of $ on great remote control equipment ive learnt a lot about taking care of batteries. charging the old ipod while downloading tracks at your convenience is a sure fire way to slowly kill your cell. i-pods are the first seriously junk-music item ever available. any portable music playing device should at the very least allow easy removal and swapping of media storage (like a memory card, mini disk, cd or cassete tape). not having the data removeable makes for a crappy product only idiots would purchase.
Posted by:joshaaurus rexNovember 14, 2007 4:42:14 AMRespond ^
Very enlightening!! Definitely changed my perspective on a few things. This bit of reading really makes it apparent that there is a HUGE battle going on... Materialistic intention vs. Environmental intention I can admit Ive succumbed to being a "bad guy" in the warfare.
Posted by:AmandaNovember 15, 2007 1:02:27 PMRespond ^
[deleted] you all [deleted]s. add the [deleted] on
Posted by:chris jerichoNovember 26, 2007 7:49:46 AMRespond ^
Excellent piece! Gives me much to think about. I use an electric mower, weed wacker, and blower, and have a hybrid car so I'm trying my best. And recently my old behemouth 21" monitor gave out, and a tech center around the corner graciously took it for parts and environmental disposal for only $10. I couldn't, with a clear conscious, just leave it for garbage pickup.
Posted by:G. MichaelNovember 28, 2007 4:16:09 PMRespond ^
Too bad--you missed an informative article.
Posted by:Able to Read Long WorksNovember 28, 2007 4:17:11 PMRespond ^
Good point.
Posted by:Don't pull the plug yetNovember 28, 2007 4:20:11 PMRespond ^
The iPod out the box... is well truly excellent, sexy, sleek, but...give it a while and you begin to see why so many people hate iPods. The hardware is a massive flaw...all you need to do is to google 'ipod problem' and you begin to see the real picture. The problems are endless and the solutions are few, especially from Apples end. I will be honest I loved my iPod when I 1st got it and actually gained respect for Apple, but now after reading so many peoples problems and lack of solutions, that I have now experienced, I wont be buying a new one!
Posted by:Big StanFebruary 6, 2008 8:26:19 AMRespond ^
Interesting article, but the assertion that AAC "locked" me into Apple's world makes me think the author is either seriously uninformed or grasping at straws to prove a point.

I've had a iPod for 2+ years, it has over 2000 songs on it and none of them are AAC files. They are all industry-standard MP3. There are lots of sources for MP3s, and they work perfectly fine on both iTunes and my iPod.

And it's true the battery doesn't last as long as it used to and it won't be as easy to replace as a set of AAAs. Still, I expect the environmental impact of years of disposable batteries would be far worse than a $15 rechargeable replacement kit.
Posted by:BRMarch 27, 2008 10:00:40 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS