MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

The Colossus of Baghdad

Page 2 of 4


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


It is worth remembering that, when the American commanders whose troops had just taken Baghdad, wanted their victory photo snapped, they memorably seated themselves, grinning happily, behind a marble table in one of those captured palaces; that American soldiers and newly arrived officials marveled at the former tyrant's exotic symbols of power; that they swam in Saddam's pools, fed rare antelopes from his son Uday's private zoo to its lions (and elsewhere shot his herd of gazelles and ate them themselves); and, when in need of someplace to set up an American embassy, the newly arrived occupation officials chose -- are you surprised? -- one of his former dream palaces. They found nothing strange in the symbolism of this (though it was carefully noted by Baghdadis), even as they swore they were bringing liberation and democracy to Saddam's benighted land.

And then, as the Iraqi capital's landscape became ever more dangerous, as an insurgency gained traction while the administration's dreams of a redesigned American Middle East remained as strong as ever, its officials evidently concluded that even one of Saddam's palaces, roomy enough for a dictator interested in the control of a single country (or the odd neighboring state), wasn't faintly big enough, or safe enough, or modern enough for the representatives of the planet's New Rome.

Hence, Missouri's BDY. That midwestern firm's designers can now be classified as architects to the wildest imperial dreamers and schemers of our time. And the company seems proud of it. You can go to its website and take a little tour in sketch form, a blast-resistant spin, through its Bush-inspired wonder, its particular colossus of the modern world. Imagine this: At $592 million, its proudest boast is that, unlike almost any other American construction project in that country, it is coming in on budget and on time. Of course, with a 30% increase in staffing size since Congress approved the project two years ago, it is now estimated that being "represented" in Baghdad will cost a staggering $1.2 billion per year. No wonder, with a crew of perhaps 1,000 officials assigned to it and a supporting staff (from food service workers to Marine guards and private security contractors) of several thousand more.

When the BDY-designed embassy opens in September (undoubtedly to the sound of mortar fire), its facilities will lack the gold-plated faucets installed in some of Saddam's palaces and villas (and those of his sons), but they won't lack for the amenities that Americans consider part and parcel of the good life, even in a "hardship" post. Take a look, for instance, at the embassy's "pool house," as imagined by BDY. (There's a lovely sketch of it at their site.) Note the palm trees dotted around it, the expansive lawns, and those tennis courts discretely in the background. For an American official not likely to leave the constricted, heavily fortified, four-mile square Green Zone during a year's tour of duty, practicing his or her serve (on the taxpayer's dollar) is undoubtedly no small thing.

Admittedly, it may be hard to take that refreshing dip or catch a few sets of tennis in Baghdad's heat if the present order for all U.S. personnel in the Green Zone to wear flak jackets and helmets at all times remains in effect -- or if, as in the present palace/embassy, the pool (and ping-pong tables) are declared, thanks to increasing mortar and missile attacks, temporarily "off limits." In that case, more time will probably be spent in the massive, largely windowless-looking Recreation Center, one of over 20 blast-resistant buildings BDY has planned. Perhaps this will house the promised embassy cinema. (Pirates of the Middle East, anyone?) Perhaps hours will be wiled away in the no less massive-looking, low-slung Post Exchange/Community Center, or in the promised commissary, the "retail and shopping areas," the restaurants, or even, so the BDY website assures us, the "schools" (though it's a difficult to imagine the State Department allowing children at this particular post).

And don't forget the "fire station" (mentioned but not shown by BDY), surely so handy once the first rockets hit. Small warning: If you are among the officials about to staff this post, keep in mind that the PX and commissary might be slightly understocked. The Washington Post recently reported that "virtually every bite and sip consumed [in the embassy] is imported from the United States, entering Iraq via Kuwait in huge truck convoys that bring fresh and processed food, including a full range of Baskin-Robbins ice cream flavors, every seven to 10 days." Recently, there has been a "Theater-Wide Delay in Food Deliveries," due to unexplained convoy problems. Even the yogurt supplies have been running low.

But those of you visiting our new embassy via BDY's website have no such worries. So get that container of Baskin-Robbins from the freezer and take another moment to consider this new wonder of our world with its own self-contained electricity-generation, water-purification, and sewage systems in a city lacking most of the above. When you look at the plans for it, you have to wonder: Can it, in any meaningful sense, be considered an embassy? And if so, an embassy to whom?



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

this will the palace to govern the whole Persian Gulf and beyond. The chinese know that.
Posted by:Bur$atilMay 29, 2007 7:32:12 PMRespond ^
Meantime is not infrastructure, Water, electricity, bridges, jobs, for Iraq people. This is the New Caliphate of BAGDAG. The Big Viceroy is Dick Cheney. Neocolonialism... is here to stay everywhere.
Posted by:Bur$atilMay 29, 2007 7:34:19 PMRespond ^
Are Americans really that dim-witted, and really enthusiastic, paying through the nose with their taxpayers money, to finance this monstrosity in Iraq? One might think that's where all the money is going that was initially given to build the necessary infrastructure of the new and from "tyranny -liberated" IraQ. No wonder peoples elsewhere turn up their noses in disdain at the very mention of the much-abused word in the English language "democracy"!
Posted by:CassandraMay 30, 2007 8:46:42 AMRespond ^
P.S. And whatever happened to the rebellious American spirit that brought down the British occupiers in that not-too-far time in history?
Posted by:CassandraMay 30, 2007 8:56:24 AMRespond ^
Reversing the many examples of American imperialism is severely flawed. The United States has a freer press, fairer judicial system, and more representative and balanced political system than anywhere on Earth. It has many problems, true, but it is only a matter of time before democracy and freedom of religion/thought/economy/etc. spread across the planet. Call me crazy, but to me that's a good thing.
Posted by:JustinMay 30, 2007 1:39:45 PMRespond ^
I cannot think of a better place for the United States of Arrogance to live up to the name I have given it. The USA is truly led by greedy fools. And it is being led "down" the path.
Posted by:KenMay 30, 2007 1:48:51 PMRespond ^
How humiliating. I think it's time for a re-run nationwide of the film with Ben Kingsley portraying the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Where's the outrage? What's going on with us Americans?
Posted by:AnnaMay 30, 2007 2:02:16 PMRespond ^
I mention the size and scope of this imperial monstrosity to people and no one knows what I'm talking about. Thanks to you and Mother Jones for bringing this out to the public [too bad it's not the general public] Keep up the good work; there are fewer and fewer reporters covering the war due to the increased restrictions on that coverage. The sanitizing of the war has pushed it out of the pubic's area of concern. I am astounded at the lack of outrage.
Posted by:wdmMay 30, 2007 2:03:31 PMRespond ^
This is truly disgusting. Shame. Arrogance gone mad. And I am paying for it? I will go for about 300 people max, live/work bldg, and modest. Live and work like the rest of us.
Posted by:loisMay 30, 2007 3:25:32 PMRespond ^
Try getting a Congressman to send you info on this Embassy, I'm still waiting for reports from one and two Senators. There's also a 15 foot wide fence around the perimeter, which is about 80 football fields. Try that along the Mexican border
Posted by:patowens@centurytel.netMay 30, 2007 3:30:49 PMRespond ^
I had no idea - how disgusting that money should be spent on an embassy building while Iraq is still unsecure - is no one with any sense even watching the purse strings? How sad that we have let our media and big business lead us astray as a nation.
Posted by:mothernomadMay 30, 2007 5:06:52 PMRespond ^
It’s a crying shame that we cannot get any truth out of this administration about our long term goals in Iraq and the middle-east. Why this monstrosity of an embassy? Why the “enduring” military bases being built? Why this whole stupid damned war in the first place?
Posted by:JerryMay 30, 2007 5:11:44 PMRespond ^
I feel physically sick when I look at the pictures of the embassy. American Empire. Not what I was raised to believe this country stands for. I am no longer proud to be an American.
Posted by:Huntington BarclayMay 30, 2007 5:40:29 PMRespond ^
1.I don't envy the people that will staff the embassy, since they will be serving year-long tours of duty; and, aren't expected to ever leave the confines of the compound. 2. Our company had been considered to provide some design services for this project; but, the project was moving so fast that they couldn't provide us with information we needed to provide them with a proposal in time for them to be able to use our work product. 3. Funny how during Viet Nam we were bombarded with the bogus domino theory of communism taking over all the neighboring countries; and, now the Bushies are predicating their resolve on the neocon domino theory: that once a democracy, then all the neighboring countries will soon fall in line to democracy. But, what about Turkey and Israel? Shouldn't they have been the lead dominoes?
Posted by:Halle BurtonMay 30, 2007 5:45:29 PMRespond ^
Where is the outrage about this and everything else this administration has done? Why are we as a collective nation allowing this to continue? Enough is enough!
Posted by:pcsMay 30, 2007 5:54:37 PMRespond ^
Well, your articles always prove your erudition and I'm sure they make you proud, but they are so long winded and convoluted that the thoughtful ideas and possibly beneficial persuasiveness they contain will never reach a mass audience. In fact, even I got tired of reading it and began skipping and skimming.I have a BA in Poli-Sci, so I'm used to this stuff, but it's worthless to pass it on to most of my friends, family and aquaitances. Set aside your egos and get to the point once in awhile!
Posted by:Keith NorenMay 30, 2007 6:41:24 PMRespond ^
"Deutshland über alles" has been forgoten. "US über alles" replaces it"
Posted by:AndrewMay 31, 2007 1:00:53 AMRespond ^
I only hope the architects have designed sufficient helicopter pads on the embassy roof. Might come in handy one day.
Posted by:steerpikeMay 31, 2007 2:42:52 AMRespond ^
How much more will the sheep living in the U.S. take? It's not going to matter because the wee Emperor has made so many enemies with his terrorist regime that he has led the lambs to the slaughter. Or has he simply prepared the fatted calf? Ya' think 9/11 was a big attack? Stay tuned for the fireworks. Shame, Shame, Shame! Wake up, America, there is nothing left to be proud of! Where's the electric prod? It's gone beyond outrage, and we need to set up residency for our dictators in Empire America. *nods* That'll work.
Posted by:pasha zioMay 31, 2007 3:23:08 AMRespond ^
Alas Babylon. Who art Babylon?
Posted by:patrick edwardsMay 31, 2007 8:19:57 AMRespond ^
Just like the grandiosity of the Bush administration coupled with idiocy.
Posted by:Ann HardmanMay 31, 2007 12:22:32 PMRespond ^
American neo-colonialism has built itself a mortuary monument bigger than any Egyptian pyramid. R.I.P:
Posted by:MikeMay 31, 2007 4:58:43 PMRespond ^
Now the State Dept. has forced the architectural firm to remove project images from their website citing security breach. What a joke. When we asked for the site plan, in conjunction with our proposal to be emailed to us, they said that was too risky. Days later we received the plans on a disk sent through first class mail. Oh yeah, security is job one. We've had these plans sitting around the office since last summer.
Posted by:Halle BurtonMay 31, 2007 5:15:12 PMRespond ^
Bush's legacy: The palace of ignorance and arrogance.
Posted by:SteveMay 31, 2007 7:53:06 PMRespond ^
Links in your story to Missouri's BDY and pool house no longer work...hhmmm? How much more foolish and arrogant can America look?
Posted by:Ruth Van AndenJune 1, 2007 9:18:51 AMRespond ^
After finding links in your story to BDY and the foolish pool house, I went directly to the source. Imagine my surpise to find that architectural link at the web site for sports work but the link to governmental architechture does not. http://www.bdyinc.com/architecture.html
Posted by:Ruth Van AndenJune 1, 2007 9:22:25 AMRespond ^
Yeah, its a damned shame that the United States of America is guilty of such a show of arrogance. The question is, what can we/Congress do about it? It seems to me that a Congressional hearing, where the likes of Bush and Cheney get called to testify, under oath and tell is exactly what they have in mind? An embassy this huge and then Bush stating that he thought we should remain in Iraq for 50 years...Something really stinks here...
Posted by:BikerdudeJune 1, 2007 1:39:29 PMRespond ^
The Iraqis must be so happy now that Saddam Hussein is out of power and the USA is in. Saddam Hussein killed many Iraqis and kept the masses secure with the iron hand of dictatorship. Now the USA has killed or proximately caused the death of hundreds of thousands more Iraqis than Saddam. And as chaos rules the Iraqis feel so secure that they are fleeing Iraq by the millions. They truly love freedom! We win! The Colossus is a monument to our victory.
Posted by:Sylvia S.June 2, 2007 11:25:57 AMRespond ^
While those not previously familiar with this embassy may be surprised, why? Traditionally large buildings of great ostentatious pomp have been built to convey to all just who is in charge here, whether a today or in medieval times, whether a foreign king or one of our own. The pictures posted in January by global research showed the embassy essentially completed on the outside, rising in full view of the Iraqis and with full knowledge of both the message of who is the real boss and who gets to be a part of construction within the country. Perhaps the biggest lesson here is the extent to which the perspective of Iraqis and Americans differs, and the extent to which information from Iraq is censored to the American public.
Posted by:erichwwkJune 2, 2007 2:20:21 PMRespond ^
All the links in this article which might show Americans where their money is goingg have been blocked from my browser and I understand they have ben removed at the State Department (Ms Rice's) request. My oh my.
Posted by:sugeetsterJune 2, 2007 3:42:33 PMRespond ^
Where is Congress on this? What is the press doing? This democracy of ours is failing in more ways than I can track, and I have grown weary of writing letters. BUT, there is really good news here also. I am confident, that for the rest of my life, and the life of my children, EVERY United States administration is going to look pretty good by comparison. If America can recover from this disaster (Bush/Cheney, not 9/11), then we might be able to survive just about AYTHING.
Posted by:BrianE.June 4, 2007 12:53:51 PMRespond ^
This is outrageous, premature, and particularly offensive when there are just a handful over there now that can even speak the langugage? And how is no one objecting and cutting back funds? Where is our Congress? Why isn't this in the newspapers?
Posted by:Audrey CarrollJune 5, 2007 8:06:55 PMRespond ^
This isn't appearing in the newspapers because their coporate sponsors will be the ones supplying this monstrosity and don't want to lose the contracts.

Dude, why do we keep electing democrats and republicans to office? Oh thats right, Nader was made a pariah after Gore lost and no one takes Kucinich seriously. And then there's Ross Perot. Anybody add some names to this list?

I don't get it why republicans and democrats keep getting elected to office.
Posted by:royAugust 22, 2008 5:34:37 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

Real Viagra, Cialis Levitra Deal
Dare to compare our competitive prices. Free overnight delivery to new patients in the US. No catch 22!

Bob's Red Mill Organic Flaxseed Meal
In addition to its great nutty flavor, our flaxseed meal is high in fiber and packed with essential Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

PEACEFUL HOLIDAY GIFTS
Items featuring the 1958 peace symbol shirts, buttons, hoodys, signs, stickers pins...more. union made • detroit peacebuttons.info

End the genocide in Darfur
Every day, Darfuris face rape, murder, and starvation. Be a Voice for Darfur: tell Obama to end the suffering.
















Oogedy-Boogedy

Putting the Noise Machine in its Place

Team of Rivals?

Czar Thomas


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS