MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Citizen Stupid

Commentary: Just how ignorant is the average American voter?

July 1, 2008


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


[Introduction by Tom Engelhardt]

The buck stops… well, where does it stop? And who popularized that phrase, anyway? Herbert Hoover, J. Edgar Hoover, Harry S. Truman, George Washington, or none of the above?

Wait, don't answer! The odds are—as Rick Shenkman, award-winning investigative journalist and founder of the always provocative website History News Network, tells us in his new book Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth about the American Voter—you'll be wrong. And when you realize the depths of the ignorance so many Americans take into the voting booth, you may indeed wonder, as Shenkman does to great effect in his new book, where indeed the buck stops.

So here we are heading toward another July 4th, that glorious day when American independence was declared and the Liberty Bell rang out to the world—the first of which didn't happen on July 4th, the second of which was made up "out of whole cloth" in the nineteenth century in a book for children (but you knew that!). Think of today's post as a bit of counter-programming to our yearly summer celebration of history, a way to ponder what exactly, in the 8th year of the reign of our latest King George, any of us have to celebrate. Consider instead the state of our national brain, preview Shenkman's new book (which should set anyone's mind spinning), and, while you're at it, watch his recent interview with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show by clicking here. Tom Engelhardt

How Ignorant Are We?
The Voters Choose… but on the Basis of What?
By Rick Shenkman

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."—Thomas Jefferson

Just how stupid are we? Pretty stupid, it would seem, when we come across headlines like this: "Homer Simpson, Yes—1st Amendment 'Doh,' Survey Finds" (Associated Press 3/1/06).

"About 1 in 4 Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment (freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.) But more than half of Americans can name at least two members of the fictional cartoon family, according to a survey.
"The study by the new McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that 22 percent of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just 1 in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms."

But what does it mean exactly to say that American voters are stupid? About this there is unfortunately no consensus. Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, who confessed not knowing how to define pornography, we are apt simply to throw up our hands in frustration and say: We know it when we see it. But unless we attempt a definition of some sort, we risk incoherence, dooming our investigation of stupidity from the outset. Stupidity cannot mean, as Humpty Dumpty would have it, whatever we say it means.

Five defining characteristics of stupidity, it seems to me, are readily apparent. First, is sheer ignorance: Ignorance of critical facts about important events in the news, and ignorance of how our government functions and who's in charge. Second, is negligence: The disinclination to seek reliable sources of information about important news events. Third, is wooden-headedness, as the historian Barbara Tuchman defined it: The inclination to believe what we want to believe regardless of the facts. Fourth, is shortsightedness: The support of public policies that are mutually contradictory, or contrary to the country's long-term interests. Fifth, and finally, is a broad category I call bone-headedness, for want of a better name: The susceptibility to meaningless phrases, stereotypes, irrational biases, and simplistic diagnoses and solutions that play on our hopes and fears.

American Ignorance

Taking up the first of our definitions of stupidity, how ignorant are we? Ask the political scientists and you will be told that there is damning, hard evidence pointing incontrovertibly to the conclusion that millions are embarrassingly ill-informed and that they do not care that they are. There is enough evidence that one could almost conclude—though admittedly this is a stretch—that we are living in an Age of Ignorance.

Surprised? My guess is most people would be. The general impression seems to be that we are living in an age in which people are particularly knowledgeable. Many students tell me that they are the most well-informed generation in history.

Why are we so deluded? The error can be traced to our mistaking unprecedented access to information with the actual consumption of it. Our access is indeed phenomenal. George Washington had to wait two weeks to discover that he had been elected president of the United States. That's how long it took for the news to travel from New York, where the Electoral College votes were counted, to reach him at home in Mount Vernon, Virginia. Americans living in the interior regions had to wait even longer, some up to two months. Now we can watch developments as they occur halfway around the world in real time. It is little wonder then that students boast of their knowledge. Unlike their parents, who were forced to rely mainly on newspapers and the network news shows to find out what was happening in the world, they can flip on CNN and Fox or consult the Internet.

But in fact only a small percentage of people take advantage of the great new resources at hand. In 2005, the Pew Research Center surveyed the news habits of some 3,000 Americans age 18 and older. The researchers found that 59% on a regular basis get at least some news from local TV, 47% from national TV news shows, and just 23% from the Internet.

Anecdotal evidence suggested for years that Americans were not particularly well-informed. As foreign visitors long ago observed, Americans are vastly inferior in their knowledge of world geography compared with Europeans. (The old joke is that "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography.") But it was never clear until the postwar period how ignorant Americans are. For it was only then that social scientists began measuring in a systematic manner what Americans actually know. The results were devastating.

The most comprehensive surveys, the National Election Studies (NES), were carried out by the University of Michigan beginning in the late 1940s. What these studies showed was that Americans fall into three categories with regard to their political knowledge. A tiny percentage know a lot about politics, up to 50%-60% know enough to answer very simple questions, and the rest know next to nothing.

Contrary to expectations, by many measures the surveys showed the level of ignorance remaining constant over time. In the 1990s, political scientists Michael X. Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter concluded that there was statistically little difference between the knowledge of the parents of the Silent Generation of the 1950s, the parents of the Baby Boomers of the 1960s, and American parents today. (By some measures, Americans are dumber today than their parents of a generation ago.)

Some of the numbers are hard to fathom in a country in which for at least a century all children have been required by law to attend grade school or be home-schooled. Even if people do not closely follow the news, one would expect them to be able to answer basic civics questions, but only a small minority can.

In 1986, only 30% knew that Roe v. Wade was the Supreme Court decision that ruled abortion legal more than a decade earlier. In 1991, Americans were asked how long the term of a United States senator is. Just 25% correctly answered six years. How many senators are there? A poll a few years ago found that only 20% know that there are 100 senators, though the number has remained constant for the last half century (and is easy to remember). Encouragingly, today the number of Americans who can correctly identify and name the three branches of government is up to 40%.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

I must agree that many people today seem unaware of basic realities, which explains the early support for the Iraq war and Bush's election. On the other hand, the statistics quoted in this article are based on an extremely low sampling rate: asking 3000 people questions means that only about 1 in 50,000 people were questioned. (Assuming an adult population of 150 million people at the time of the survey.) In other words, the results are no more valid than the polls that plague the news shows today. Some of the statistics may be misleading in other ways: mention is made of how only around 50% of the young population has voted since being given the right to vote. However, that statistic is also true of the adult population.

But does the current generation lack basic knowledge? Certainly. As an instructor for college English courses, however, I must say that I sometimes worry that the cause may not be lack of interest so much as cynicism towards and a deep suspicion of the political process, and a corresponding indifference towards its exact workings. In addition, many college students today have jobs while attending school, and stay in school longer, making it hard to pay attention to the news. And the poor, whose parents were usually poor, face low job prospects, even if they don't drift away from high school before graduation, or prison, given the "war on drugs." Yet, I must admit that a large problem is probably just bread and circuses: why worry about what they can't control when they can stay up all night playing video games?
Posted by:Jake JohnsonJuly 1, 2008 6:52:41 PMRespond ^
To slightly paraphrase the recently Late George Carlin: the depressing fact is that if you consider how ignorant the AVERAGE person is, you've got to realize that fifty percent of the rest are MORE IGNORANT THAN THAT!
Posted by:JimBobJuly 1, 2008 7:55:30 PMRespond ^
When schools settle for the appearance of education (just so long as the students enjoy the experience), what else should we expect?

When my son attended Washington State University, part of his work study program had to do with conducting workshops for entering students who were incapable of passing a basic test of composition. When I was visiting the campus, I sat in on one of his groups. These undergraduates could barely craft a coherent sentence, yet they saw nothing wrong with their lack of what should be a basic skill.

The fascinating part of the experience lay in the fact that every single one of these students had completed Advanced Placement courses in English .... with high grades.

Parents want high grades and low workloads for their children. Over 75% of the parents with whom I have spoken over the past ten years hold some level of belief that there is little of any value in the academic curriculum. The entire point of high grades is to facilitate moving on to the next level of education.

When people are paid to stand up in a seminar and propose that anything worth saying must be said within 30 seconds, we are not likely to get better.

And none of it is new. In the 1950's, a Presidential candidate was doomed when his opponent characterized him as an "egghead". Students of the time were told: "Good citizens do not want to be treated like privileged characters."

In programs for the 12 - 20 demographic, the cool kids have problems with classwork. The ones who do the work and get the grades are the figures of fun.

We can have a nation that values intelligence and academic accomplishment, or we can continue with what we have.
Posted by:Mike CarterJuly 1, 2008 9:38:36 PMRespond ^
america is toast

dumber than dumb

how do you think we got into this war

ignorance

instead americans want to blame the politicans

mirror time in america

during the vietnam war over 80% of americans did not know who the viet cong were

even mc cain has no idea who we are fighting in iraq

nations usually deserve their leaders
Posted by:researcherJuly 2, 2008 1:54:04 AMRespond ^
There is a big difference between stupid and ignorant. Stupid means you cannot, ignorant means you are deprived or lazy. Very few in the United States of America are deprived.
Posted by:harrengaJuly 2, 2008 7:06:53 AMRespond ^
How ignorant are we? Well we voted for George W. Bush, or did we?
Posted by:Abel P. OchoaJuly 2, 2008 10:48:02 AMRespond ^
It is very sad that the apathy is so strong. There is so much at stake right now. I am not sure that I want the under 25 year old to vote at all since they do not seem to care.
Posted by:star5555July 2, 2008 3:31:23 PMRespond ^
This is very revealing article with profound implications:

We are the dummies who have been taken to the river by our politicians at every election cycle, yet prevented from drinking any water.

How many times have we heard those shrewd politicians telling us: The American People want this or want that? They pretend to take cues from us, but ultimately vote for the interest of their handlers in Corporate America, because they know that we couldn’t tell the difference. This political deception will go on so long as the average American lives in this sad state of ignorance.

One statistic in the article stood out: 81% of surveyed knew about Pearl Harbor and nearly 70% knew about the Holocaust, yet only 1 in 4 knew about the five basic freedoms guaranteed by the constitution. This illustrates how good trained animals we have come to be. They can systemically ingrain in us selective knowledge which fits the propaganda of one special interest group or another, while withholding what make us better citizens in more vibrant democracy. Knowledge of the Holocaust is very useful in drawing our sympathy for Israel, thus billions of our tax money can be given to a racist, religious extremist state that is committing its own holocaust against the Palestinians. Feeding us selectively about Pearl Harbor will serve well the Military Industrial Complex who wants us to believe that we live in very hostile world that is ready to jump and destroy us. They don’t tell us, for example, that our defense spending is larger than the next 20 countries after us combined. Few Americans know how many democratically elected leaders we have overthrown and how many dictators we have installed around the globe who had murdered thousands of their own citizens at the order of our CIA. We, often, have been the victimizers not the victims.

Yes, the best experts at exploiting our ignorance are those whom we elected to represent us. George Bush and his Neocons were masters at exploiting our ignorance by taking us to war based on deception that we could not detect at the time. They gutted our Habeas Corpus right and civil liberties, with the help of Congress, by passing the Patriot Act. The sad fact about all of this is that they have treated us no better than trained animals in the process. Do you recall the color scheme they used to scare us with into submission: Yellow, Orange and Red colors flashing in our faces at airports, federal and state buildings? This scare tactics worked, we have elected a puppet master to a second term and now we are paying the price of our great ignorance.
Posted by:ZackJuly 2, 2008 6:12:01 PMRespond ^
one small quibble with the article: "Some 60% believe that he [the president] can appoint judges to the federal courts without the approval of the Senate" He in fact can, via a Judicial Recess Appointment. Granted, it is a temporary appointment made while the Senate is in recess, but he does have the power to appoint federal judges...
Posted by:Zippy W PinheadJuly 2, 2008 11:25:26 PMRespond ^
I teach several humanities courses at a private university in Northern California. Recently we were studying Walt Whitman (few students had ever read him), when several in class argued about the meaning of Justice. They said it was only a concept "like Truth" with no real, practical meaning. I was appalled. The disconnect from the wider world and the daily existence--and struggles--of millions, seems odd given the tsunamis of information webbing the globe. I have to grit my teeth and dig my fingernails into a bit of hope, even when one graduating student dismisses homelessness as a problem of "the bums."
Posted by:ChrisJuly 3, 2008 10:10:16 AMRespond ^
What about the information we are given? I am one of the "young" generation that does read the news. I quit relying on CNN/Fox and the like since most of it is biased and/or rigged and the local new (at least here) is a joke! Sure there is a lot of information, but where is the truth? Why is it we have to search for "other" sources of news to get a shred of truth?
Posted by:robJuly 3, 2008 1:31:48 PMRespond ^
Where are the solutions? We are a nation of critics. You are dumb. You are dumb. But why? Why are we becoming so illiterate and ignorant? You barely answer that question. Is it the education system, the higher incarceration rate, culture or just simply that more information dilutes the quality of information and how we consume it? I spent a couple minutes readings this article and learned nothing I didn't already know. Just another man telling me and my generation how dumb we are without offering up any semblance of vision or possibilities.
Posted by:joe ruggieroJuly 3, 2008 3:08:14 PMRespond ^
Well, when the media plays to the dumb and ignorant how do you expect to open peoples eyes?
Britney and Paris are more important than national and global issues?
What about only serving fast food at schools instead of healthy meals?
Instant gratification vs. working hard for what you want?
What about a young generation that has no manners and no respect for others?
Give a kid a "timeout" instead of a spanking? WTF!?!?!
Turn of the video games and tell them to get outside.
Turn off the TV and tell them to get a hooby.

Don't we as a society promote stupity, ignorance and laziness in our every day actions?

How about YOU be the change you want in the world. It starts with you and how you teach others by your actions.
Posted by:JJuly 3, 2008 4:10:40 PMRespond ^
the sad truth is that you can not listen to any news station, because all you get is propaganada; one way or another, anything but the truth
Posted by:d.l. butlerJuly 3, 2008 7:13:18 PMRespond ^
Has anyone talked to a European?
Posted by:Bill GoldscheinJuly 4, 2008 7:08:33 AMRespond ^
Great and true article, but it could apply to the rest of the World: Humans are inherently stupid or at least made stupid by culture and organized religion which does not foster thinking for the sake of thinking!
Posted by:Rosemary Graham-GardnerJuly 4, 2008 7:16:36 AMRespond ^
As a former Protestant minister I am intrigued by the "what is truth?" aspect of this discussion. Our dumbing down is very troubling but to hear that people don't listen to any news is frightening. Reminds me of some evangelicals I know who ignore the news for just these reasons, such as: "Can't tell what the Truth is." Come on. Have we lost the reasoning abilities, the wisdom, to sift what we hear, compare, discern, question and decide? The search for what is true (good, just, etc) is worth the search. It seems unwise (maybe silly and stupid) to stop the search either because you believe you've found The Truth or because you give up wanting to know all the little truths that make up our lives. . .
Posted by:ChrisJuly 4, 2008 1:30:04 PMRespond ^
Wow. Second Mother Jones article I've read recently which I've not been able to stand.

I'm a liberal, but a liberal who doesn't choose to demonize the rest of the electorate as a bunch of ignorant bastards. As a former teacher, I've worked with the broken education system. You want to reform America? Reform the horrid education system, which teaches everyone they can be President, and where the students learn nothing.

The greatest blunders we liberals took part in is the destruction of the American education system. And it's our socially-aware, politically correct fault.

Wake up. Our education system is apartheid on a massive scale.

Michael
http://shambollocks.blogspot.com/
Posted by:Michael BrettJuly 5, 2008 7:53:26 AMRespond ^
And most politicians, particularly at a local level have known this for years. With low voter turnout, incumbents can get their base out, (often 10-20%), know full well that the rest of the voters "don't care." Their terms in office become life-long careers.

My guess is that former Senator Boren in his book, "A letter to America" has it right.
Posted by:TedJuly 5, 2008 3:54:54 PMRespond ^
As my uncle said - many, many years ago, "The American electoral process is based on the premise that 200 million (it was that many years ago times ignorance equals wisdom."
Posted by:aehtorodJuly 6, 2008 4:44:47 PMRespond ^
As my uncle said - many, many years ago, "The American electoral process is based on the premise that 200 million (it was that many years ago) times ignorance equals wisdom."
Posted by:aehtorodJuly 6, 2008 4:45:41 PMRespond ^
Best commentary on this topic thus far; please rush to distribute copies to public schools and colleges....post haste
Posted by:elephanteyes@msn.comJuly 14, 2008 8:49:31 AMRespond ^
An individual who drives a car while talking on the phone is a dangerous, unthinking idiot. That same individual could be a responsible, thoughtful human being who conducted himself intelligently, maturely and responsibly -- if he chose to. Ignorance is a choice.
Posted by:wonderwomanJuly 16, 2008 4:44:54 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















Debate Liveblogging - 10.07.2008

The British Bailout

Debate Preview

Debate Bingo....This Time For Real!


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS