- ‹ previous
- 2007 of 2041
- next ›
Hillary Clinton Followup
HILLARY CLINTON FOLLOWUP....Hillary, as we all know, isn't a naturally great speaker, but she did good tonight. She gave a great speech that pumped up the crowd, told her supporters in no uncertain terms to vote for Obama, and included an attack line that even my wife thought was pretty zingy (rough, from memory):
"It's fitting that John McCain and George Bush will be meeting in the Twin Cities next week, because it's getting pretty hard to tell them apart."
A pretty good job, I'd say. As usual, I have no idea how your average couch potato is going to react to it, but I liked it.









Digg
Reddit
Twitter
Facebook
Buzz Up!
StumbleUpon
MySpace
LinkedIn
Delicious
Furl
Google
Yahoo






shortstop, there's two different issues (well, three; i'll get to the third in a moment).
bill clinton believes that hillary clinton would be a better president than barack obama. we all know that. so for him to claim that obama is the best possible candidate would be widely - and accurately - seen as a phony remark. so he doesn't make it.
what he does say, for example, in the abc news interview, is: ""I'm not, and I never was mad at Senator Obama. I think everybody's got a right to run for president if he qualifies under the Constitution, and I would be the last person to ever begrudge anybody their ambition, and he was a superbly gifted candidate in this election, and had a great operation."
and "Clinton was asked if Obama is ready to be president, and said, 'You can argue that no one is ever ready to be president?He has shown a keen strategic sense in his ability to run an effective campaign. He clearly can inspire and motivate people and energize them, which is an important part of being president, and he is smart as a whip so there is nothing that he can't learn.'
http://www.politicususa.com/en/Bill-Clinton-World-News-Tonight
after all, was bill clinton ready to be president? no, he wasn't, and he'd be the first to agree.
so i think that he's saying and doing perfectly acceptable things and he will tonight as well.
third point: what i really think is beneath you, shortstop, is claiming that clinton has an "adolescent's control over his emotions," he "needs constant praise," and he has to be the "center of attention." beyond the obvious fact that politics is full of narcissists, i don't think any of that is the kind of thing that those of us who only know clinton (or anyone else, for that matter) through the tv screen and the printed page should be armchair psychologizing about.
clinton gave a great speech for kerry in 2004 at the convention; he'll do the same tonight.
we should leave the clinton psyche for the bottom-feeders like maureen dowd....
shortstop, there's two different issues (well, three; i'll get to the third in a moment).
bill clinton believes that hillary clinton would be a better president than barack obama. we all know that. so for him to claim that obama is the best possible candidate would be widely - and accurately - seen as a phony remark. so he doesn't make it.
what he does say, for example, in the abc news interview, is: ""I'm not, and I never was mad at Senator Obama. I think everybody's got a right to run for president if he qualifies under the Constitution, and I would be the last person to ever begrudge anybody their ambition, and he was a superbly gifted candidate in this election, and had a great operation."
and "Clinton was asked if Obama is ready to be president, and said, 'You can argue that no one is ever ready to be president?He has shown a keen strategic sense in his ability to run an effective campaign. He clearly can inspire and motivate people and energize them, which is an important part of being president, and he is smart as a whip so there is nothing that he can't learn.'
http://www.politicususa.com/en/Bill-Clinton-World-News-Tonight
after all, was bill clinton ready to be president? no, he wasn't, and he'd be the first to agree.
so i think that he's saying and doing perfectly acceptable things and he will tonight as well.
third point: what i really think is beneath you, shortstop, is claiming that clinton has an "adolescent's control over his emotions," he "needs constant praise," and he has to be the "center of attention." beyond the obvious fact that politics is full of narcissists, i don't think any of that is the kind of thing that those of us who only know clinton (or anyone else, for that matter) through the tv screen and the printed page should be armchair psychologizing about.
clinton gave a great speech for kerry in 2004 at the convention; he'll do the same tonight.
we should leave the clinton psyche for the bottom-feeders like maureen dowd....
An outstanding, classy, speech by Hillary Clinton!
Kari
A pretty good job, I'd say
WTF is wrong with you? She was fucking magnificent.
She knocked that ball right out of the park with bases loaded.
Amazing. Awesome. Divine.
(My first positive internet post about HRC ever!)
She made an excellent, utilitarian speech. Hit all the hot buttons and was careful to insert "his-name-here" as the person to vote for.
I will, of course, and not holding my nose. Just with a resigned sigh.
I'm expecting more from the Big Dawg.
Alibubba has it right. She apparently could not bring herself to say anything favorable about Obama as a person, but a great speech and one that gets her out of jail with democrats.
Three questions:
1. Don't you think Obama is sitting somewhere thinking about whether he made a mistake in not picking her as VP?
2. What is the chance that Biden will bow out and Hillary will be VP nominee tomorrow? [I say at least 10%]
3. What percent of democrats are thinking that they should have nominated Hillary for president? [I say more than 50%]
Great speech ruined by CNN allowing an idiot delegate go on and on about how it convinced her that Hillary deserved to be president and Obama did not. I hope Howard Dean kicks her ass and strips her of being a delegate.
It was a race baiting, dog whistling, calculating, baggage holding, ambitious, poll-driven, backstabbing, knee-capping, unelectable, divisive, polarizing speech. Did I leave any of the 'bot attacking points out? I'm not good at conscious sexism, or I'd have thrown some of that in there as well.
As an aside, any plans on a redesign of this place? It's a little cold and clunky, with a bizarre mixture of too much text and general business, and too much white space -- an interesting design accomplishment to be sure, but not one to be proud of.
Fantastic. Great speech, great delivery, and finally someone is hitting the Repubs where they live.
I'm sure the idiot Media will drag it and her through the dirt by the morning...
3. What percent of democrats are thinking that they should have nominated Hillary for president? [I say more than 50%]
I think it only took George Bush three months before more than 50% of the country wished they had voted for Kerry. Cunt.
CNN's repsonse was typical.
You'll hear them gripe about the orange dress, the failure to mention Obama by name enough, and then they'll run right out and interview the same fourteen last-ditchers they interviewed earlier in the week.
You can change the government, you can change the value of pi, easier than you can change the Narrative.
On the tombstone of the Republic will be the epitaph 'Killed By A Story Arc'.
"It was a race baiting, dog whistling, calculating, baggage holding, ambitious, poll-driven, backstabbing, knee-capping, unelectable, divisive, polarizing speech. Did I leave any of the 'bot attacking points out? I'm not good at conscious sexism, or I'd have thrown some of that in there as well."
Think so? Didn't notice any of that. After all, I voted for her.
I thought she hit it exactly right. In fact, that could be the best speech she ever gave. I don't know how you could ask more of her.
What drives me nuts is the sports-bar style post game commentary. Even the NPR stuff was lame. They've got to fill the airtime, they don't really know what's going on, and they're too lazy, or too inept, to find out. So, it's all about the feud.
As the evening went along I moved from CNN to MSNBC to PBS to C-Span. C-Span was the best, no talking airheads.
"So, it's all about the feud."
How true.
That's why I wish the Obama campaign would simply isolate about two-to-four issues -- all economic, ideally -- and beat them to death on the campaign trail.
Hillary ran for president for her own reasons. I'm sure her reasons included service as well as ego. She had her own message and goals. If she really believed in her own campaign, it's unfair to berate her for not being as enthusiastic about Obama's campaign, no matter how hard she may try to be a Democratic team player. The reverse would be true as well.
The quicker the Democrats focus on a clear, compelling message, the quicker the feud -- and John McCain -- will go away.
A "Heinz 57" agenda never works. Jobs as an issue trumps the plight of dyslexic left-handed lesbians in most households, regardless of the validity of the lesbians' complaint.
The uncomfortable fact is that the Democratic party is always divided. Will Rogers pegged it: "I am not a member of an organized political party. I am a Democrat."
I didn't get a chance to watch much commentary of the speech beyond Keith Olbermann saying she hit a five-run home run, but people have said that those at CNN loved it. That, more anything else, will make the difference.
I just wonder when the really torching of McCain's reputation will start. I'd love for Bill Clinton to do it tomorrow night. If there's any way for him to earn some respect back from those he pissed off during the primaries, it's to douse McCain in gasoline and then light a match.
Bill Nichols, managing editor of Politico.com, told all DC news radio WTOP that Hillary gave only a "perfunctory" performance -- a "bare minimum of support for Obama." She "did what she had to do, but she barely did what she had to do." He said Hillary spoke primarily to her supporters, and the Obama campaign probably was okay with this speech, but it wasn't the "unifying moment they'd hoped it would be."
He said the Obama campaign was "realistic" about this speech and that Hillary "did do enough that they'll be able to move on from this."
Listen here:
http://wtop.com/emedia/130431.mp3
I really don't know who this guy was listening to, but I don't think it was Hillary.
"It's fitting that John McCain and George Bush will be meeting in the Twin Cities next week, because it's getting pretty hard to tell them apart."
Good line, Hillary, but Casey's "sidekick" line was a great one.
The Politico had that review leftover from June.
GREAT!
Loved it!
Let's kick McSames ass!
I was getting really depressed watching the unbelievably bland and passionless speeches by Sebelius, then Warner... wondering what the hell this party stands for if they can't muster fire and vision after 8 years of what the Rs have done to the country... and then Deval Patrick started to give me some hope... and then I thought Hillary knocked it OUT of the park, better for me than any speech I can remember Bill giving, and I had to wonder if Obama was wondering if he should have put her on the ticket... guess we'll see how Biden does! Hillary had VISION to counter the Rove/Cheney view of the world and that's what the Dems need. The earlier part of the evening made me very very very worried about this party!
The "Twin Cities" joke was hilarious! I hope Obama & Co. are smart enough to make that a buzzword of this convention, 30 second ads, etc. GREAT GREAT LINE. Whoever wrote Hillary's speech deserves a big fat raise! And I'm a big Obama supporter!
I have to say that watching the speech, I felt that the first half would have been almost exactly the same if she had WON the primary. It was all about her. Then it was about the party needing to win.
This, for me, was the bare minimum she could have done to retained standing with the party. She never took back what she said about Obama lacking the leadership credentials to be President. She could have easily said "I thought that then, but the campaign he has run has shown me how wrong I was." But of course, if she couldn't admit to being wrong about the war, there was no chance in heaven and earth that she would admit being wrong about Obama.
Maybe I wasn't watching the same speech as everyone else, but I was struck by what a wooden speaker she continues to be. Better than 18 months ago, but clearly in a different league than either Obama or Bill.
I was disappointed but at least she told her supporters in no uncertain terms that to vote for McCain was lunacy.
At first Hillary sounded like she was still running, but by the end she was golden.
Wow.
MSM picking this very great and uniting speech apart. They spout their own opinions rather than facts. They say Barack is not specific, well neither is most of the MSM. Scarborough said Clintons secretly want Obama to lose so they can run in 2012? What does he base that opinion on? And is that appropriate?
I thought Clinton did a great job of balancing playing to her supporters and supporting Obama. It was the best speach I have ever seen her give. Her message was clear and I think overall the message of the convention has been clear - it isn't about her, it isn't really about Obama - it is about taking back the White House and the country.
I'm no fan of Hillary, but I thought it was fantastic. Easily the best speech I've ever heard her give, and not just because of the content. Her delivery was light-years ahead of anything I've heard her do before.
I would give her an 8.5 for execution and a 9.9 for degree of difficulty.
She was in a tough spot given all the build-up, but she talked about her issues and then explained why she wanted Obama. I'm not sure what else we could have asked from the woman.
We'll see what president drop-pants has to say tonight. The way Bill Richardson told it last night, its Bill and not Hill that's prolonging the grudges.
I thought you spoke on behalf of us average couch potatoes!
We'll see what president drop-pants has to say tonight. The way Bill Richardson told it last night, its Bill and not Hill that's prolonging the grudges.
That's quite obvious from the Big Dog's demeanor and commentary, even in the last couple of weeks. Still, I imagine he'll get it together, if only because he won't want to be remembered as a petty grudge holder. mr. shortstop remarked that the biggest thing safeguarding Bill against making an ass of himself tonight will be Hillary's incredible speech--the guy's nothing if not competitive!
Keven Drum, are you kidding? The speech was alright? It was fantastic. Aren't you regretting leaving the Hillary camp to desert to the Obama camp? He doesn't, today, look like the shoo-in he did in early 2008.
I thought it was a great speech and I agree with the person who pointed out the level of difficulty factor - it would be a challenging speech to give for anyone. Nonetheless, I think the people who keep harping on whether or not Obama regrets not choosing her as his VP sound a bit naive and ridiculous. Think of it. She did a good job of bandaging the wounds last night, but it would have seemed like the most contrived political move yet to name her the VP. Considering how petty some of her supporters have been, I can imagine them not voting for an Obama-Clinton ticket merely because of the billing order. I would have voted for Hillary in a heartbeat, had she won, despite the fact that I favored Obama months before she conceded. That is putting your values ahead of your pride - something Hillary did masterfully in her speech last night.
After months of reading on blogs how evil and conniving and untrustworthy this woman is, I hope the writers compare their beliefs with reality.
And the same goes for Bill. Does anyone really think he will sabotage Obama in his speech? If you do, you've watched way too much FOX news and it's infested your mind.
jen f, sadly, there are people so completely unhinged by clinton-hate, of both bill and hillary, that yes, they believe bill clinton will sabotage obama, and yes, they can't stfu about how hillary should have said "this" or "that" instead of accepting that she gave an excellent speech.
it's incredibly sad and pathetic to see people descend to this level of foolishness based entirely on media stereotypes that they've absorbed (all the while thinking what brilliantly independent thinkers they are) but there you have it.
And the same goes for Bill. Does anyone really think he will sabotage Obama in his speech?
Of course not. "Sabotage"? Melodramatic much?
I don't think he's going to reach anywhere near the perfect pitch, complete lack of self-focus, and full commitment to the candidate and party that Hillary achieved last night. I don't have any reason to think he will, given his public statements and demeanor since Hillary lost the primary race. She, on the other hand, could give lessons on how to conduct oneself after a concession.
Anyone else notice that at the beginning of Hillary's speech, when she says she is "a proud mother; a proud Democrat; a proud American; and a proud supporter of Barack Obama," she did not say she was a proud wife?
Anyone else notice that at the beginning of Hillary's speech, when she says she is "a proud mother; a proud Democrat; a proud American; and a proud supporter of Barack Obama," she did not say she was a proud wife?
Just you and FOX, I'm guessing.
Shortstop -
Sabotage seemed a good word since it implies small acts designed to undermine. Sabot being the wooden shoe the peasants used. And no one who has ever heard a Bill speech expects this one to be a good speech either. He is long winded. ALWAYS.
Just watched the speech on the internets.
I agree, good job, did what she should have done as a Democratic party leader. I think everybody rates it a 10 because they didn't know what to expect; that is what you get for listening to the corporate media all week. The Clinton's are Democrats through and through.(Although I did wonder when they were siding with McCain over Obama)
But......
A big part of the speech was all about Hillary. I realize that is who she is, and is one of the things I didn't like about her. Still, it is irritating. Bill always had a way of saying almost the exact same words, but not making it sound like it was all about him, it was about us.
The camera kept flashing shots of Bill, obviously, then it occurred to me, he wrote the speech. He kept nodding his head, as if to say, "yeah, that was a good one". I started having deja vu from the 90's; this thing sounds exactly like the speeches the dawg used to give. I always enjoyed Bill's speeches, the man knows how to talk and what to say. This isn't a knock on Hillary. I just think Bill wrote a two part speech; Hill gave the 1st part and Bill closes tomorrow.
Sabotage seemed a good word since it implies small acts designed to undermine.
Still completely unrelated to anything actually said in this thread.
Look, I'll spell it out even more. I don't think Bill Clinton is going around consciously trying to undermine Obama. I think he's got an adolescent's control of his emotions and he's patently incapable of hiding them, particularly when they're negative. He also needs constant praise and petting, and is uncomfortable when someone else is the center of attention, most especially someone in the Democratic Party. Some or all of that may be reflected in his speech tonight, and if it is, it will have nothing to do with "sabotage."
He also needs constant praise and petting, and is uncomfortable when someone else is the center of attention
I have a friend who interned for Clinton (not that one) and he pretty much said the same thing to me. He said Clinton is the most egotistical person he has ever met. Still loves the guy, and says he was a great President. These things are not mutually exclusive.
The only thing I noticed from Clinton's speech was that Bill was the last person to stand up when Hillary first announced her support for Obama. Clinton only got up a second or two after the camera panned back to him. It seemed intentional to me.
Clinton only got up a second or two after the camera panned back to him.
This kind of microscopic analysis of people's facial expressions and body language is beyond silly. Clinton was clearly beaming through the whole speech, enormously proud of his wife. Beyond that obvious observation, anything else is mind reading.
thank you, rob mac, for beating me to the point: what a silly, silly, silly remark you made, enozinho. honest-to-frickin'-god, what possesses people to try and play these mind-reading games? for all you know, his foot was asleep and he couldn't get up.
sheesh.
and shortstop, really, your 1:04 is beneath you.
Sorry you feel that way, howard, but unlike your vague accusations of "Clinton hate," the Big Dog's record since June is pretty solidly supportive of his inability to get past this loss. Bill Clinton has yet to say, even when asked directly in interviews, that he thinks Obama is qualified. He mutters darkly and dramatically to reporters about not being able to "speak freely" on the 2008 election. Sigh.
The guy's been behaving like a sulky child since Hillary conceded, in direct contrast to how Hillary has conducted herself. If he puts all that away tonight and gives us a great party- and candidate-supporting speech, you'll hear me cheering all the way on the west coast. There couldn't be a bigger or more admiring fan of what Hillary accomplished last night than I.
shortstop, there's two different issues (well, three; i'll get to the third in a moment).
bill clinton believes that hillary clinton would be a better president than barack obama. we all know that. so for him to claim that obama is the best possible candidate would be widely - and accurately - seen as a phony remark. so he doesn't make it.
what he does say, for example, in the abc news interview, is: ""I'm not, and I never was mad at Senator Obama. I think everybody's got a right to run for president if he qualifies under the Constitution, and I would be the last person to ever begrudge anybody their ambition, and he was a superbly gifted candidate in this election, and had a great operation."
and "Clinton was asked if Obama is ready to be president, and said, 'You can argue that no one is ever ready to be president He has shown a keen strategic sense in his ability to run an effective campaign. He clearly can inspire and motivate people and energize them, which is an important part of being president, and he is smart as a whip so there is nothing that he can't learn.'
http://www.politicususa.com/en/Bill-Clinton-World-News-Tonight
after all, was bill clinton ready to be president? no, he wasn't, and he'd be the first to agree.
so i think that he's saying and doing perfectly acceptable things and he will tonight as well.
third point: what i really think is beneath you, shortstop, is claiming that clinton has an "adolescent's control over his emotions," he "needs constant praise," and he has to be the "center of attention." beyond the obvious fact that politics is full of narcissists, i don't think any of that is the kind of thing that those of us who only know clinton (or anyone else, for that matter) through the tv screen and the printed page should be armchair psychologizing about.
clinton gave a great speech for kerry in 2004 at the convention; he'll do the same tonight.
we should leave the clinton psyche for the bottom-feeders like maureen dowd....
so for him to claim that obama is the best possible candidate would be widely - and accurately - seen as a phony remark. so he doesn't make it.
Who said anything of the sort? Do you honestly not recognize the difference between admitting basic qualification and "claiming that Obama is the best possible candidate"? Really?
what i really think is beneath you, shortstop, is claiming that clinton has an "adolescent's control over his emotions," he "needs constant praise," and he has to be the "center of attention." beyond the obvious fact that politics is full of narcissists, i don't think any of that is the kind of thing that those of us who only know clinton (or anyone else, for that matter) through the tv screen and the printed page should be armchair psychologizing about.
Howard, Clinton is not the still-mysterious spouse of an up-and-coming new politician. This guy has been firmly in the public eye for 17 years, plenty of time for people to form some easily supportable opinions about his personality strengths and weaknesses. The latter, it's pretty generally agreed, include a particularly large case of narcissism, a rotten temper and a tendency to openly display his (high) emotions.
I didn't pull a bunch of stuff out of thin air and slap it on some shadowy figure, for heaven's sake; we've all had almost two decades to watch this guy's public behavior and see many of the same things, both positive and negative, play out over and over. My observations about his conduct since Hillary's concession were built on that foundation of 17 years' worth of events, not some suggestion that his wife's primary defeat has caused him to suddenly exhibit strange new behaviors.
clinton gave a great speech for kerry in 2004 at the convention; he'll do the same tonight.
Clinton's wife wasn't an odds-on favorite who lost to Kerry in 2004. I hope he gives a stupendous speech tonight. As I said, I'll be the first to say so.
Somewhat amusingly from my perspective, I've been yelling at petty critics of Hillary's speech over at Benen's all day. I sure as hell don't deny that there are people who are being knee-jerk hypercritical of the Clintons on a very broad level. I do note that hastily assuming that anyone who criticizes some specific Clinton behavior is an "unhinged hater," and indulging in rank mischaracterizations of that person's statements, is not a particularly credible way of demonstrating a superior sense of balance.
shortstop, i didn't say you were an unhinged clinton-hater; go back and review my comments. i said your 1:04 was beneath you, which is not the same at all.
as for the rest, i don't know what your first response comment means; the best i can surmise is that you think he should say "barack obama is fully qualified to be president," and i'm not sure why that matters so much or why it makes him a "sulky child" for not having said it.
in the more general case, sure, he's been a public figure for a while now: so what? one of the primary things i object to in modern punditry is this assumption that we can peer into the psyche of a public figure and think we understand it.
i don't care about his psyche: that's for him and his family to deal with. i have no idea if he needs to be the center of attention (that's not what the evidence of the past 7.5 years shows me, but i'm not really interested in speculating about that); i have no idea what his control of his emotions is (jeez, he gets angry sometimes? really? and that demonstrates an adolescent's control of his emotions? not to me).
and i especially have no idea at all about his subconcious motivations, etc., etc., etc., and neither do you.
shortstop, you're an exceptional commenter and it gives me no pleasure to be going back-and-forth on this (indeed, i'm going to stop), but truly: i think you're over-psychologizing with very limited basis, and i continue to think that's beneath you.
That great speech will be hard for Bill to top. Her great performance makes it much less likely that Bill will be petty.
POI: a true couch potato will settle for nothing less than a hide-a-bed permanently deployed. Sitting on a couch is bad for the heart.
Frankly as a Minnesotan it pissed me off quite a bit. It's not my fault that they are being hosted in my home state.