MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Backtalk

April 25, 2007


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


From the May/June 2007 issue.

Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank's study of the Iraq War's impact on terrorism, "The Iraq Effect," was picked up by media worldwide, ranging from CNN to India's Tribune to the front page of London's Independent.

On the blog Hullabaloo, Tristero wrote, "What's astounding is that this study is, apparently, the first public attempt to quantify by how much terrorism has increased since Bush opened the gates of Hell.... What's also astounding is that this study appeared not in the Times, not in the Post, not in Foreign Affairs, not in The Economist, but in...Mother Jones. Good for Mother Jones, of course, but WTF??? That's a little like opening up Popular Science and finding out that they've published the first paper by Einstein on relativity because no one else would dare to." On opendemocracy.net, Sidney Blumenthal wrote that the theory "that the U.S. presence in Iraq cannot possibly be an inspiration for terrorism is simply not shared at the highest levels of the senior military, including commanders on the ground in Iraq. I have learned that they are privately reading, circulating, and in agreement with [The Iraq Effect]."


Iraq's Other 50 Percent
I am disappointed that in your "Iraq 101" package there was no coverage of sexual violence against women in the American and Kurdish militaries, and only scant mention of that against Iraqi women and children, when human rights groups note that such abuse is on the rise. Why is it that human rights groups are the only ones consistently noting the sexual crimes committed against women? I find it appalling that a magazine run by mostly female editors either never considered or chose not to include any substantial information about such an important matter of violence in Iraq.
nicole-marie despain
Portland, Oregon

Happiness, With a Side of Applesauce
I am the creator of the Pork Chop Theory, which corroborates—much more briefly—Bill McKibben's "Reversal of Fortune." My theory exposits the basis of capitalism: I'm supposed to want a pork chop today, two pork chops tomorrow, four the next day, eight the next day, and so on. Of course, if I have no pork chops, I would most definitely want one. And I might want two tomorrow. But if I ate eight or sixteen pork chops per day, I'd be put away, quite rightly. McKibben gets to the heart of the matter. As the Greeks put it, "Nothing too much."
joanne forman
Taos, New Mexico

No Choice on Taxes
Troy Newman may have been less than honest in dealing with women ringing him at his new offices ("Born-Again Abortion Clinics," by Josh Harkinson), but happily he can no longer be economical with the truth on tax-free dollars. Last September 11, the Internal Revenue Service withdrew Operation Rescue's 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. While the IRS never lets on specifically why it takes such action, it might have had something to do with the group's blatantly illegal politicking against the pro-choice Catholic candidate John Kerry during the 2004 presidential election.Conservative Catholic organizations like Operation Rescue often seem to think they exist on a higher plane, usually above the tax law. But they should adhere to the same laws that the rest of us follow, which just happen to be secular ones.
jon o'brien
President, Catholics for a Free Choice
Washington, D.C.

Questioning Gay Assumptions
Although I appreciated Cameron Scott's "The Gay Marriage Stimulus Package," what about the fiscal liabilities once you consider Social Security? Wouldn't recognizing those additional marriages put additional strain on the already underfunded Social Security system? And you assume that in same-sex couples, both work and would move up the economic ladder. How about those who might marry the unemployed or quit to raise dependents?
nancy mendez
Silver Spring, Maryland

Mocking Maria
I don't know much about Ave Maria University ("Hail Mary," by Bill Donahue), but have heard it is generally regarded as among the more authentically Catholic colleges. Donahue is clearly able to turn a decent sentence and, as is so popular in journalism these days, say what he really wishes to say without ever actually saying it (or find other people to say it for him). However, it might have saved some ink if he had written just one line: "I think Ave Maria is stupid, backwards, and silly."
seth murray
McMinnville, Oregon

Mother Jones welcomes letters from readers. Please include your name, address, and tele­phone number; to ensure timely publication of your letter, please send it as soon as possible. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. Contact us at motherjones.com/contact; fax (415) 321-1701; or send to Backtalk, Mother Jones, 222 Sutter Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94108.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

How do I subscribe to Mother Jones? I can't find that info anywhere on the website.
Posted by:Mark WaltersMay 28, 2007 7:24:35 PMRespond ^
What comedia del arte. Bush against genocide. Think about the consequences of the Palestinans beeing deprived of international help funds. A near civil war, Bush only interest in Soudan is to cut off China's oil source. Was done in Irak, why not Soudan. A long long time ago depriving Japan from resources prepared Pearl Harbour. Have'nt you got any history courses, The US don meddle un other countries internal affairs... they starve them or "librate" them from non-democratic governments.
Posted by:tripleeJune 1, 2007 12:40:32 PMRespond ^
I am amazed at the depth of your article. I do have a request. As I understand it, the 4 top US oil companies and BP from the UK will "get" the oil for 35 years. Can someone calculate out the TRUE cost of that oil, based on the cost of stealing it through this horrible war?
Posted by:George in PennJune 2, 2007 2:42:49 PMRespond ^
Why is no one talking about the Project for the New American Century - a group with members such as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld - a group whose stated purpose is to ensure America's role as global leader - through military action if need be! How has this been overlooked by the media and political debate? -or have I just been living under a rock?
Posted by:KarinJune 6, 2007 9:44:40 AMRespond ^
We are undergoing a Civil War of sorts, much like what happened in the 1860’s. Battle lines are being drawn. They are not physical, there is no Mason-Dixon Line drawn in the dirt. But there are lines nonetheless. This line is a human one, it is the welfare line. This war is an economic one. Big Business claims they need cheap immigrant workers in order to make a profit. This is eerily similar to what the Southern Plantation owners said with regard to their need for slave labor in the 1860’s. It was blatantly untrue then just as it is untrue now. Yes, America is at war. And Americans are under siege. Our casualties are numbered in the jobs lost to offshoring, and from cheap labor south of the border. And the battle rages. Corporate profits are up. Family incomes are down. We are being bombarded with misinformation. The fear mongers make idle claims of the high cost of produce if we lose the cheap immigrant labor. And to paraphrase the Eagles; “Jesus, people are buying it.” We are being sold out by the very people we elected to represent us. Our President, and even some in Congress, put the financial interests of Big Business over the welfare of the American worker. We elected the bums. We can vote them out! Robert Kruger 232 Gorham Street Morenci, MI 49256 Phone: 517.458.7765 Email: rkruger@tc3net.com
Posted by:Robert KrugerJune 9, 2007 4:14:19 AMRespond ^
16JN07 - 35 years ago; a brother-in-law heir, working in a library; bragged of subscribing to Mother Jones, so I tried it; and, am 'out of step' with Mother Jones. If it's any consolation, I'm out of step with society in general - no TV, movies, basketball, baseball, etc. MJ is catering to thowe who happen to be in tune, if any. HOUSTON TX
Posted by:Richard S. Schmidt, HOUSTJune 16, 2007 6:06:53 PMRespond ^
Please! You have an article on the women under the Taliban regime and I want to know who I can donate to that can possibly help these women. Women in Black? Who? I'm talking about policy and plain old food and healthcare - something has got to be done for these women! Please help me!
Posted by:Christina KostoffJune 17, 2007 3:20:33 PMRespond ^
The Iraqi Outcome No One Will Admit Alas, all the possible “good news” about our venture in Iraq appears pretty much worn out and exhausted. But having said that, the fact is there seems to be no one – in either political party – who is willing to admit the truth about the most likely scenario and outcome in that sad country. And, what would that be? That chaos, killing, and tragedy will almost certainly continue...whether we stay or go. The dynamics of the situation surely point to that. Recently, John McCain was on Meet the Press. Tim Russert noted that in his appearances in 2003...2004...2005...2006...and now on this show, McCain had proclaimed that “things were getting better, and success was not far off”. Obviously, that has not proven true. Nor does it give comfort to McCain’s current rosy claims. All the other Republican candidates, in recent debates have also held to that party line. Never, once, did any admit to the outcome I have suggested. They all say we cannot afford to “lose” in Iraq. But “losing” suggests “winning”. And when I challenge my conservative associates to explain to me what “winning” means, I am generally met with stoney silence. If this is a true “war”, winning usually suggests the capture of territory. Or the destruction of the enemy. Or the capitulation of one side. None of these can happen in this conflict. There is no territory to gain. We cannot kill all, or even enough Al Quida to make them quit (plus, we do not even know who is the enemy in this battle). Thus, my conclusion, the chaos will remain, whether we stay ...or go. Then there are the Democratic proposals. Biden suggests dividing the country. Others want a “phased” withdrawal. I see nothing in these proposals that will create a final solution to the violence, enmity, and hate that is present in Iraq. This is just nice “tilting at windmills” to avoid admitting things are in an irreparable condition, and that there may be no solution as I suggest. These all appear, to me, simply a valiant attempt to sugar coat a bitter pill and/or mollify the voters. The one Democrat who did suggest a negative outcome was Harry Reid, who noted “this war is lost”’ but he was so roundly condemned he backed off very quickly. And now of course, the Democrats have capitulated on the funding bill, which further leads me to believe no change in the outcome is in sight. Apparently, this is now an issue where the public is ahead of elected legislators. If “winning” means the establishment of a democratic government...end of sectarian violence...an end to the bombing and killing, we can be in Iraq for possibly decades, and still not find an end. Though that has a meager chance of succeeding, I doubt that Americans will tolerate a protracted occupation of that many years. So again I conclude this country will remain in chaos for years to come – the surge notwithstanding. In fact the vaunted surge is not even a real effort to find a total solution to Iraq’s deep seated crisis. Calming a few neighborhoods in and around Baghdad, for a temporary period of time, is almost a joke, considering the scale of the problem. The best description of the reality in Iraq that I have yet seen, was a Doonesbury cartoon a few weeks past. An Iraqi soldier and an American soldier were riding in their Humvee to an insurgents’ house. Paraphrasing, the American said: “We have to go to this house and pick up some terrorists. “ The Iraqi asked where the house was, and then responded to the effect: “I know that house...I cannot pick up these people...they killed some of my relatives... I will have to kill them to get revenge.” The American replies: “Really? When?”. To which the Iraqi responded: “1385”! As one of my friends once said, the value of Saddam was he “governed the ungovernable”. How true that was, until we destabilized the region. But then again, as we have seen in the Palestinian Hamas fiasco, rational behavior has never been one of the strong points of Middle East actions. Further supporting the claim that chaos will reign in this sad country is the fact that Bush himself has made absolutely NO effort to really support this conflict, if as he claims it is so vital to our national interests. There is no draft. There are no raised taxes, No one, except our modest (and apparently inadequate) military, now greatly overstressed, has been asked to sacrifice. If this is so critical to America, where is the mobilization of our resources? It simply has not been invested, or requested – again leading me to believe a positive solution is not likely. It is also instructive to note we no longer hear the phrase “cut and run”. Why? Because even the hardliners know they may have to ultimately back out of Iraq as gracefully as possible. Now, even Bush is beginning to cover his backside. Toss in a bit of incompetence, corruption, lying, and stubbornness, and it is very hard to see anything good possibly happening. Well, if my prognosis is so bleak, is there any possible light here? Can there be any “winners”? Well, maybe. First, there are the Iraqis themselves. They want us to leave, according to recent polls, and the vote in their legislature (we are often perceived as “occupiers” and the cause of the violence – fair or not). Maybe our departure will force them to step up to the plate? We too, can be beneficiaries in a number of ways. World opinion...conservation of our resources...balancing our budget.... and most importantly, the saving of lives. Afghanistan may be better if we apply greater resources there to support a legitimate government that is now in place and is capable of governing a critical country. In a strange and ironic way, the Middle East may also benefit if the leaders there themselves are pressured to take a hand in the Iraqi situation -- a job we cannot do ourselves. And finally, even the so named “war on terror” may benefit, if we reapply our resources, focus, and determination on more relevant targets. But beneficiaries or not, we must admit that the most likely conclusion of this misguided adventure will be chaos and bloodshed, whether we stay or leave. Though it is a sad scenario, it may well be inescapable. I am not promoting defeatism, cowardice or fear...just reality. Sometimes the physician cannot heal, and the patient dies. And that leads me to conclude that America should purge the surge...and leave Iraq now! Myles Spicer Retired Minnetonka, MN
Posted by:myles spicerJune 19, 2007 7:34:39 AMRespond ^
In light of the recent news that Cheney now considers himself an entity unto himself and a separate branch of government unto himself, immune from oversight and above the law, I am calling upon all MoJo readers to send the following message to the House Judiciary Committee, Pelosi and Reid. It's high time we put an end to the madness: I am calling upon your committee to immediately issue arrest warrants for Dick Cheney, George Bush, Karl Rove and Roberto Gonzales for conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution of the United States of America. It is apparent that a coup d'etat is currently underway and our nation faces great and grave peril. We, the People call upon your committee to use its powers to put an end to this madness immediately. Who and what does this Cheney person think he is? Above the law? A branch of government unto himself? We, the People, demand action today. Sincerely, Your name
Posted by:ClayJune 22, 2007 9:57:40 AMRespond ^
EVENTUALY.THE VETERANS ADMINSTRATUON HAS FORGOTTEN AN ENTIRE GENERATION AND IS DOING IT AGIN. THE IRAQI VETS HAVE NO FREEDOM OF SOEECH AND ASSEMBLY. WHEN THEY DO THEY ARE STRIPT OF THERE RANK AND ASSISTANCE TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM.THE POINT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WON'T GO TO ANDRES AIR-FORCE BASE TO GREAT THE IRAQI VETS THAT HAVE BBEN KILLDED IN ACTION. THIS WOULD TAKE COURAGE FROM THE LEADER OF THEFREE WORLD! ARISE VETERANS ON SEPTEMBER 11 AND TAKE THE UNITED STATES CAPITON BACK! THE CONSTITUTION TELLS THE AMERICAN CITIZENS TO TAKE THE LIBERTY WHEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE MINORITY CONTROLS THE MAJORITY. EVERYONE SAYS IT WON'T WORK. IF YOU WON'T ASSEMULATE AND KEEP CONTRESS IN SESSTION THROUOUT THE SUMMER YOU ARE HELPLESS. THIS IS HOW ADOLP HILTLER AND MOSOLINI TOOK POWER. STAND UP TAKE YOUR DO NOTHER GOVERNMENT BACK!
Posted by:william phillipsJune 24, 2007 6:27:00 PMRespond ^
Where are you Dick Cheney? Are you over the rainbow, under the linden tree or beyond the pale? There were a great many moments during the past six and one-half years when I could have sworn you were giving a steady stream of tips to whatshisname but I guess those heady days now are gone forever. It could not have been easy extricating yourself from what the Constitution makes very clear is one of three branches of the government. It's also quite clear that you can't be a member of the Supreme Court since you've never been seen in black judicial robes that, come to think of it, might imply a bulk reduction of 35 or 45 lbs. When you left the executive branch, did you say "goodbye" to your secretary or would that have been simply too human an experience? If you belong to neither the executive nor the highest court, that seems to leave the legislative branch although I don't recall your running for office. Perhaps you were "divined' into it through your good works at Halliburton, credits not to be underestimated. Where are you Dick Cheney? Maybe, we simply imagined you as a major nightmare in this most improbable world? Robert H. Sanders Bellingham, WA 360-647-8773
Posted by:Robert H. Sanders,June 29, 2007 12:10:44 PMRespond ^
Toilet Vision Having assumed the position again for the millionth uncounted time, poised like Rodin’s “Thinking Man” I was flushed into a journey of my own mind - you might say I experienced a “toilet vision”. So, I have a point to make and although it is not a pretty one, I think, it is a pretty important one. I intend neither to unsettle your stomach, nor test your patience in my somewhat awkward and somewhat impolite written pursuit of what follows, and what heaven hopes is the truth. I simply know no other way to tell you what I want to say. I am very literally about to, as spoken in the street vernacular, “talk [deleted]”. It is an inescapable fact of life that to have a physical existence we must eat, what is eaten is not all used by our bodies, and what our bodies don’t use, must be expelled for the purpose of literally casting off “dead” weight. While crouched in my primal position, this vision showed me all of the harmful and oppressive weight of my life symbolized in the despised matter I was in the process of casting off from myself. My effort was beginning to feel like a religious act. I was separating the dead from the living for the purpose of remaining healthy, vigorous, and active in thought, speech and action. After a massive evacuation I concluded - White Supremacy is the [deleted] of life. No other socio-political agenda has so much in common with excrement. It stinks with the odor of arrogance, haughtiness, hubris, hatred, degradation, and devaluation of the human person. Who wants to smell, or stand in close proximity to what stinks like [deleted]? White Supremacy is [deleted], decaying matter – if not for the millions of dead and rotting bodies that perpetually emanate from the deceptive and deadly politics of white supremacy, then the draining of resources from constructive and life giving actions, wreaking havoc on all living things. The most damaging thing a White Supremacist does is practice deception in the form of lies. Like fecal matter, these lies vary in size and consistency, are all putrid and harmful, and for the political body of the human being to live healthy, lies must be separated from the truth in the same way that for good health in the physical body decaying cellular matter must be separated from healthy cells. When this separation does not occur, deadly cancer does, thus causing the death of the person. This was the day the sentence of Lewis “Scooter” Libby was commuted by President Bush. Another well dressed, well-heeled, and smart white person was under law given a pass for lying under oath. I cannot say Scooter’s fortune was the genesis of my thinking on this topic; however it was most certainly pertinent. It’s perfectly clear a War was started based on lies, and for all the so-called well-intentioned reasons for going to War in Iraq, the bottom line is hundreds of thousands of non-white people are lying dead now and more will follow. The fact that Iraqi’s are being strong-armed into giving away their national treasure – Oil, to the oil companies owned by white people gives pause to the so-called good intentions spouted on every news outlet for the last six years. It appear to be consistent with the aims of White Supremacists everywhere, even the vegan ones, whose [deleted] doesn’t stink so badly, who would never think of using the “N” word. Someone decided this non-white patient, the Iraqi nation and her people, is infected with cancer, and should die. No chemotherapy, no hydrotherapy, and no surgical procedures. War is a cancer which spreads, and just as sure as certain people were elated to see Hussein hanged by the neck, and his sons mangled bodies lying side by side, that war is sure to come home in one way or another. War brought, if not from a stealthy enemy without, then one from within. In other words, will Al-Qaeda come to America to do its dirty work as “evil-doers”, to “kill us” as President Bush like to say? I think not. The real cancer is in the hearts and minds of people who say they are neutral, or worse yet, say they are against poverty, illness, illiteracy, drunkenness, perversity and greed. Those who put their hands over their hearts and mutter the anthem of choice while supporting in every way the agenda of racist man and racist woman in the global, national, local system of Racism/White Supremacy. They say times have changed, but have they really? Just a few short years ago, black people in the United States were being burned at stakes and hung in trees, with sometimes hundreds of white people standing around enjoying the ghastly show. Who were those people, and what motivated their monstrous behavior? Who are these people today who send other people’s children to war in another country to kill and maim other people for what appears to be a White Supremacist agenda? What in the world possesses a man to decide to submit scores of innocent people to campaigns of “shock and awe”? Let me leave you with this warning, as I leave the [deleted] house door. What man thinks his [deleted] doesn’t stink right to the core? What man thinks he can retain his [deleted] and not be eventually taxed for it? I say this with all the deadly seriousness of every precious secret ever known. Keep holding onto this [deleted] called White Supremacy in all its masked and amorphous forms and we all will die from its toxins. Every tree, every brook, every preacher and every crook, all the animals and all the plants, fish and fowl, microbes and fleas, children and parents, uncles and aunts, all that we know and love as “life” is in danger. Let death be separated from life, and let us “live” for once, and for all. Flush… Amen.
Posted by:John Saleem BilalJuly 8, 2007 8:49:27 AMRespond ^
July 4, 2007 A Patriot’s Message The hammer falls on the Constitution of the United States of America. Our freedom and Democracy, our sovereignty as a nation is coming to an end. The politically appointed neoconservatives in Justice sneer at Habeas Corpus; Geneva Convention; worker, consumer, investor and environment protection; education; affirmative action; individual rights and “entitlements” like Social Security and health care. The corporate neo-con conspirators (Establishment) have their own agenda of a New World Order; W.T.O; N.A.F.T.A; immigration; globalization and “free trade”; military seizure of foreign oil fields; employing a private army of mercenaries and propagandist; “dealing” with Afghanistan Opium drug lords harboring Osama Bin Laden and financing Al Qaeda. The ideal corporate model is “Communism” where individual freedom and democracy are mute. The board of directors rule. The corporate neo-cons hate our regulatory government, Constitution and Individual Rights. Our Federal Government is purposely bankrupt by war/trade debt and the ideal corporate nation, China, are carrying trillions of dollars of our debt. Communist China and their junior corporate American partner’s technically own the”U.S.A” resulting in “Globalization” and loss of sovereignty. Mission accomplished. The surge strategy is not to win the war but to pump oil and further indebt U.S.A to Communist China. Patriots, sign on! Impeach Bush, Cheney and nullify their Supreme Court appointments! Lawrence Baker
Posted by:Lawrence BakerJuly 13, 2007 8:59:13 PMRespond ^
Bravo to Jamie Cantwell for finding a short commute. But nobody makes the conscious decision to spend their lives driving to work. Jobs are located where the owner wants to live, not where workers can afford to live. And I've met few managers who would tolerate telecommuting. Many think that if a person isn't in the office, they aren't working. So if one seeks an answer to the problem, look a little higher.
Posted by:Lisa ColeJuly 16, 2007 3:01:42 PMRespond ^
Iraq, Iraq, we did attack. By May ‘03, we nothing lacked. Mission accomplished said flight suited Prez, But most don’t believe all what he says. 51 months later, blood still flows. In fact, the violence just grows and grows! Whatta we do? Stay the course? Not, of course! How ‘bout cut ‘n run? Not! You sonvagun! So, what’s the forward path? One that won’t be filled with wrath? One that stops Muslim bloodletting, Without forgetting Justice, balance and fair play. This is gonna take many a day. So, what’s the role of the USA? Just what role should we play? Should we advise and train? Then let them try to end their pain? Work ourselves out of our blood toil And let them use their own oil. Will it be separate regions of sect? A tri-federation the Iraqis can erect. Where each sect gets a even share That is clearly seen by all as fair.
Posted by:Dan RynbergJuly 19, 2007 2:10:29 PMRespond ^
Corporate America want's illegal immagrants so they can enslave another race for profit, while taxpayers foot the bill ,enough fire them all.amen
Posted by:Walter 7/22/07July 22, 2007 4:10:12 PMRespond ^
I am a subscriber and I read an article about Denmark and Sweden and their use of alternative energy sources. I can't find it now. Can you please tell me which Mother Jones it was in? Thanks and Peace Mini
Posted by:Mini SpragueJuly 28, 2007 12:02:45 PMRespond ^
I find it deplorable that our tax dollars in the billions are given to NGO's calling themselves stewards of the land, salmon recovery, people for cleanner water. I used to consider myself an eviormentalist now I see it as a ploy to take property away form generations leaving behind a wake of dead chum (baby salmon) eagles nests buldozed into river, small river island rapied and sediment filling a river and killing salmon spawing grounds making a river that was once 21feet deep to 9feet in less then 3 months. Its sinistire how Columbia Land Trust parntershiping with Ducks Unlimted has distoryed farm lands, homes, habitat all with our tax dollars all under the shadow of salmon recovery. In the pacific north west they tote on their web site as good for the salmon backed by community support when the fact is 99.9% of the comunity would like to run them out in any way they can. Columbia Land Trust is no friend to the salmon nor the earth and ethical is not in their vocabulary.
Posted by:Yolaunda KarrakerJuly 30, 2007 12:00:23 PMRespond ^
The mars back home of all Iraqi refugees. One of the greatest things Mahatma Gandhi had organized against de British colonial power, was his Satyagra Salt Mars. Millions of Indian people stood up and travels immens distances to the seashore as a protest against their British rulers. That was the beginning of the collaps of the colonial occupation. How salutary would it be, when in our days all the four million Iraqi refugees decided to go back home. All men, women and children stand up and start their journey back to their own cities, their own villages, their own houses. Two millon people marching from Syria, Jordan, Iran, Saudi Arabia. Also starting to march two million people more from their temporary locations in Iraq. When determined, all those people sure would be a tremendous power, really invinceble. Protesting against all violence, rape, sectarianism, ethnic cleansing, robbery, occupation, looting and marauding. Claiming back their own houses, villages, cities and country. On that day no militias and foreign troops can decide anymore. No foreign governement can rule anymore. The mars back home of fout million Iraqi refugees will bring about a conversion of minds towards peacefull thoughts and deeds. Language of war becomes Language of peace. Signs of war becomes Signs of peace. I am aware that to organize such an powerfull event is gigantic. But at first: spread the word to anyone as much as possible. I hope somebody or a group of persons will take the initiative for The mars back home of all Iraqi refugees. Niek Albers Zonstraat 53 bis 3581 mr UTRECHT Netherlands tel 030 – 254 59 33
Posted by:Niek AlbersJuly 31, 2007 4:24:56 AMRespond ^
While I am strongly opposed to privatization of anything, your item about privatization of roads was myopically leftist. The much bigger issue here is that people need to stop or at least greatly reduce their driving. No one has the right to destroy our planet with his or her car. Only 8% of people on the planet own cars, and a true leftist would be far more concerned with getting piggish Americans out of their cars than about privatization of roads.
Posted by:Jeff HoffmanAugust 3, 2007 9:29:23 AMRespond ^
TACKLING THE IRAQI PROBLEM HEAD-ON: The only Honorable, Acceptable and Long-lasting Solution. (An Igbo/Biafara perspective) The Igbo (Ibo, Ebo, Egbo, Hebo, …) a nation that call themselves Ndi Mbu (the first created people), Ndi Gboo (the ancient people), Umu Chukwu (the sons and daughters of the Most High), Ndi Eze (kings and queens), and the human being the call Mma Ndu (the beauty of life or the masterpiece of life) have sayings that are well tested and thousands of years old, below are some of them: Oha Ka - The people are supreme Eziokwu bu ndu - Truth = Life Odi be ndi - Respect for the way of life of other peoples or nations Egbe belu Ugo belu - inalienable right of both the strong and the weak to co-exist in peace Using the ageless wisdom and philosophy of my forefathers, the above proven philosophical truths or axioms, I will seek to produce a framework (general outline) for the resolution of the Iraqi dilemma. It is my hope that this will help move the debate of the Iraqi crisis towards a seedy and fair resolution. The American people have spoken loudly and clearly, they demand the end of the Iraqi project/experiment FORTHWITH! To produce a lasting and holistic solution below are some of the conditions that must be met,  Genocide or ethnic cleansing is not acceptable and must not be condoned  All Iraqi political and religious leaders must be identified and put on notice that, o Any Iraqi leader whose followers are involved in ethnic cleansing will be persecuted to the fullest and held accountable (Accountability)  The new Iraq by all measurements must be better than the old Iraq  Terrorists and their organizations whether home grown or imported must not gain a foot hold in Iraq  The independence and sovereignty of Iraq as a nation cannot be compromised as long as the composite peoples that make up Iraq agree to continue as one  Iraqi natural resources cannot be negotiated away  Any solution must be based on truth, so that each section will accept the outcome  The right of all the peoples of Iraq to co-exist in peace cannot be compromised Having set out a solid foundation for the process of lasting peace in Iraq we can now begin to lay out the solution. As senator Bidden continue to remind us, the solution is already contained in the new Iraqi constitution – a loose federation. The Kurds are already implementing this solution in their region. The question then is how to implement this solution in all Iraq with the least amount of pain. Areas of Interest Non Mixed Areas – Areas with 80% (?) or more of the same group Mixed Areas – Areas with no defined majority Care must be taken to make sure that ethnic cleansing is not implemented in any of the areas as control is gradually transferred to any of the groups. The goal is to convert Iraq into regions which will give the peoples, be they Sunni, Shiite or Kurds a stake in their own region, importantly they themselves will govern themselves. As can be seen, the solution is a bottom up instead of a top down solution (you build from ground up) – all fundamentally sound governments are built from ground up. This should explain why the current government of Iraq remains unpopular and coming apart at the seams. Implementation From the period a plan is worked out and accepted to not more than three months after congress and the president have come to an agreement, the regions would have been identified and put in place. This will give the Iraqis a sense of owership, something that is lacking at present. Areas of contention can be labeled as federal territories that will be administered by a mix of Iraqis and an international coalition. As control is gradually handed over in the non-mixed areas, most of the US troops in these areas will be re-deployed to the mixed areas. An internation coalition of troops will be put together to replace the US troops as they are drawn down. A drawdown of the US troops will begin as soon as the president and congress agree on a date, at a pace determined by the US military leaders until 90% (?) of the troops have been drawn down. The 10% (?) left will be part of the internation coalition that will help Iraq towards a peaceful transition. Maazi Nnaemeka Mene Onumonu-Uzoaru An Igbo/Biafara Analyst, Strategist and Long Range Planner Member: Ekwe Nche Research Institute/Organization A 501 (c3) organization Website: www.ekwenche.org E-mail: ekwenche@hotmail.com
Posted by:Nnaemeka OnumonuAugust 4, 2007 7:18:17 AMRespond ^
A verse for our "Christian" leaders:On these grounds is sentence pronounced:that though the light has come into the world men have shown they prefer darkness to the light because their deeds were evil.And indeed,everybody who does wrong hates the light and avoids it,for fear his actions should be exposed;but the man who lives by the truth comes out into the light,so that it may be plainly seen that what he does is done in God. Jn3:19-21
Posted by:DevraAugust 4, 2007 11:57:21 PMRespond ^
We should export a few million illegal immigrants to Iraq to help rebuild the country. The pay should be better as well as job security without the risk of deportation. This is particularly true as american construction jobs dry up. Gary Cruzan
Posted by:Gary CruzanAugust 5, 2007 7:00:13 AMRespond ^
We middle class Americans are nearly powerless, politically, compared with corporate PAC‘s and wealthy political contributors. The ballot box has not worked and will not work for us. Democracy is no longer “one person, one vote”, but “one dollar, one vote”. Some actions that thoughtful middle class Americans seem to favor: 1. Cut defense spending in half. Our expensive mega-weapons are far beyond what we will ever require for homeland defense. This does not mean we short change soldiers. Fear of the constant enemy is encouraged by our defense industry, Congress, and the White House. We have seen how little of the defense dollar goes to protecting and caring for our soldiers 2. Establish universal health care. Properly managed universal health care would cost far less than today‘s administratively over-burdened system and would allow American companies to better compete in world trade. 3. Require “fair” foreign competition. Import duties should be based on foreign wage scales, lack of pollution regulations, use of child and slave labor, lax industrial safety regulations, etc. American corporations thrive on foreign work rules that are blatantly illegal in the U.S. while American workers are laid off. 4. Make corporate and political malfeasance a capital crime. No terrorist, traitor, drug pusher, murderer, or thief causes more damage to the ideal of America than a crooked politician or corporate official. China just executed an “FDA” official for taking bribes. A few prosecutions and convictions might send a clear message that we are exhausted by thievery, greed, and lies. 5. Tax all income as income, regardless of its source, and on a progressive scale. The wealthy benefit the most from a stable, secure America, so they should pay the most to live here. You drive a $20,000 car, you do not pay the same insurance as for a $100,000 car. You have assets of millions, you pay insurance (taxes) accordingly. Reduce the federal tax code to one small volume. 6. Place a moratorium on ADC and other payments for children born to parents who are clearly unable to care for the children. The middle class pays for “care” of children whose parent(s) are incompetent. Such children are likely to be our future criminals and prisoners. Every dollar we pay is one less we spend on our own children. Eliminate welfare and other social services for non-citizens. 7. Legalize drugs and release non-violent drug offenders. The government maintains strict drug laws in order to create jobs in drug enforcement and prisons. Legalization would put drug lords and many other bottom feeders (some in government!) out of business. The wealthy buy and use drugs; the poor go to jail. 8. Clean up the environment. The wealthy can pay, at least in the short term, to avoid the effects of pollution. Pollution may profit the wealthy few who invest in polluting industries, but results in enormous long term expenditures and poor quality of life for the rest of us and our children. 9. Term limits in Congress. In addition, we are drowning in government, federal, state, and local. Mandate no more government employees and reduction through attrition. 10. Balance the budget. If we could mimic PAC’s in their unity and in dollar clout, we might obtain favorable political attention. How? We each send this list of concerns to our creditors: car loan, home mortgage, credit cards. We inform them (and mean it!) that we will make no payments until the above legislation is enacted. We place the money we withhold from creditors in a special account. We do not spend it! Our effort is not an excuse to avoid paying our debts. When the legislation is enacted, we pay our outstanding bills, but NOT penalties for late payment. This is an opportunity to reclaim America. If you believe in the Constitution, the idea of America, justice, and freedom, this is your chance to make a difference. For questions, info, addition to the mailing list, and to submit ideas, contact: reclaimusa@yahoo.com
Posted by:s. jacobsAugust 6, 2007 8:48:44 AMRespond ^
Paddy Chayefsky’s satire “Network,” won an Academy award for best screenplay in 1976. He was so far ahead of the rest of us in seeing what was happening to this country and the world that much of what was in the play has in fact happened. There are two scenes that I think are exceptional. The first is where the character Howard Beale (played by Peter Finch) tells the audience why they should be concerned about the death of Marc Ruddy the head of the network: Beale: “…Because you people and 62 million other Americans are listening to me right now. Because less than 3 % of you people read books. Because less than 15 % of you read newspapers. Because the only truth you know is what you get over this tube.” “Right now, there is a whole, an entire generation that never knew anything that didn’t come out of this tube! This tube is the Gospel. The ultimate revelation. This tube can make or break presidents, popes, prime ministers, This tube is the most awesome goddamn force in the whole godless world and woe is us if it ever falls into the hands of the wrong people!” The fact is that the media we have taken for granted for so long to be an unbiased part of our checks and balances in this democracy, has in fact been taken over and centralized. Powerful rich people like Rupert Murdock now control much of the “freedom of speech” in this country. Much of what took place in the play such as the superfluous crap that passes for “news” has taken place. Certainly, the major news networks do not question the actions of the government as in the past. Where was CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, or Fox when Bush was raving about going into Iraq? None of the networks even questioned the idea. The second scene is where Howard Beale is asked to see Arthur Jensen (played by Ned Beatty): Jensen: “You have meddled with the primal forces of nature Mr. Beale and I won’t have it! Is that clear? You think you merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country and now they must put it back! It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity. It is the ecological balance! “You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no Third Worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems! One vast and immane, interwoven, interacting multi-variant, multinational dominion of dollars! Petrol dollars, electro dollars, multi-dollars, Reich Marks, Rins, Rubles, Pounds, and Shekels!” “It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today. And you have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and you will atone! Am I getting through to you Mr. Beale?” “You get up on your 21-inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM, and ITT and AT&T and Du Pont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today.” “What do you think the Russians talk about in their councils of state? Karl Marx? They get out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, minimax solutions and compute the price-cost probabilities of their transactions and investments just like we do.” “We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime.” “And our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there’s no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit in which men will hold a share of stock. All necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.” “And I have chosen you Mr. Beale to preach this evangel.” Beale: “Why me?” Jensen: “Because you’re on television, dummy! Sixty million people watch you every night of the week, Monday through Friday.” Beale: “I have seen the face of God.” Jensen: “You just might be right, Mr. Beale.” Globalization (“The New World Order”) has in fact created the situation that the character played by Ned Beatty describes in the scene above. The fact is that international banking and the Trilateral Commission, World Bank, WTO, IMF, G7, GATT, and NAFTA etc. do create foreign policy, even if it goes against democratic principles. The Federal Reserve does create domestic policy, even if it goes against democratic principles. Eisenhower warned us about the Military-Industrial Complex. The corporations that make weapon systems such as General Dynamics, Raytheon, McDonnell Douglas, create foreign policy. That is why I am not so sure that those in power have not already selected the next president, and that what we will be participating in will be “smoke and mirrors.”
Posted by:NetworkAugust 6, 2007 8:56:39 AMRespond ^
the way i see it about any project is a dream that allows people to react a place to a positive dream to form a alliance with there coworkers.
Posted by:ReneeAugust 9, 2007 3:21:46 PMRespond ^
if you have any questions please email me at renee_moore@hotmail.com
Posted by:Renee mooreAugust 9, 2007 3:25:31 PMRespond ^
www.myspace.com/presidentbyamendment I make it possible. Make it happen.
Posted by:Rick HohenseeAugust 10, 2007 12:39:52 PMRespond ^
"Conservatism Kills" would be a great t-shirt factotem (slogan) that I'd be proud to wear. Here is another idea for one: I kind of adopted the top sentence from a graphic comic; I think in the book "Alice in Sunderland". Above a round ceramic pot, with a shot of Bush rising from the pot below it, it says: "GROW YOUR OWN DOPE". Underneath the ceramic pot it would say: Plant a BUSH". What do you think?
Posted by:Adele M. DoolingAugust 11, 2007 3:31:42 PMRespond ^
School of Shock by Jennifer Gonnerman. Any insight into how we can solve this barbarism? Europe would not allow it. Can we vote? This is horrific. Is there an IQ on the children after shock? What is the sucess rate in society, any college graduates? The GPA please.
Posted by:Sheryl SkoglundAugust 14, 2007 7:35:01 AMRespond ^
Creating A Carbon Economy We have developed systems to make carbonsequestration profitable, overcoming the main objection to it by creating a new carbon economy instead of treating it as a waste. The systems are under Patents Pending, CN 8283. You can read all about it at our website at: http://www.geocities.com/profadrian/SCAF.html Adrian Vance
Posted by:Adrian VanceAugust 17, 2007 8:16:43 PMRespond ^
I DO NOT BELEIVE AMERICANS KNOW WHAT THEY ARE IN FOR .THE ARTICAL I HAVE IS DATED NOVEMBER 2001 , ON THE PLANS FOR WAR ON TERROR ,FOR TOTAL CONTROL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDER A NATZI STYLE REGEME , THE WHOLE PLAN OF THE ATTACK ON 9/11 WAS PLANNED IN 1997 CALLED PNAC GEORGE BUSH SENIOR ,AND THE NEO CONS PLUS BILL CLINTON WANTED ANOTHER PEARL HARBOUR ,YOUNGGEORGE WAS THE PERFECT SCAPE GOAT AS YOU ARE NOW SEEING HE IS BEING LEFT TO TAKE THE BLAME ,ALL TERRORIST ATTACKS ARE BEING CARRIED OUT BY SPECIAL FORCES TRAINED ON 5000 ACRES IN AMERICA BY ERIK PRINCE MULTI MILLIONIAR ,AND A RELIGIOUS RIGHT WHO HELPED FUND BUSH'S ELECTION CAMPAIGN AS FOR PUSHING BUSH HIS MENTOR IS LEO STRAUSS ,EVANGILIST,AND VERY DANGEROUS PUSHING HIS IRAQ BUTTONS WERE WOLFOVITCH CHENEY FOR THE HALLIBURTONS THE NAME OF THE MERCERNARIES IS BLACK WATER ,NOT AL-QAEDA AND TRANSCIPTS THAT LEAKED OUT FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT TELLS THAT SENATOR EASTMAN A ROBACHER ADMITTED THAT THEY [THE STATE DEPARTMENT] FUND THE TALIBAN ,THE WAR ON TERROR HAS TO KEEP GOING USING MOSTLY MERCERNARIES AND TORTURED BRAIN WASHED HUMAN BOMBS FROM THESE TERRIBLE CAMPS ,AS COLIN POWELL SAID BEFORE HE RESIGNED WE NEED TERRORIST FOR GLOBALIZATION ,THERE IS SO MUCH EVIL IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND PENTAGON GOING WAY BACK TO FOUNDATION ,THE BILDERBERGS AND THE BOHEMIAN GROVE ELITE , ARE MOSTLY THE SAME REPTILIONS ,AND THERE ARE 300 THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE ZIONIST ELDERS AND THEIR 25 PROTOCOLS WHICH ARE HAPPENING NOW THE TWO MOST NOTED ARE RUPERT MURDOCH AND HENRY KISSENGER READING THEIR PLANS MAKES ME SHAKE AND I DO NOT HOLD MUCH HOPE FOR THE TROOPS IN IRAQ AS WIPING IT OUT IS THE PRIORITY . YVONNE ADAM
Posted by:YVONNE ADAMAugust 19, 2007 12:10:27 AMRespond ^
When I look at what topics i think about and then think about what views I take, Its no wonder we are where we are. I have become a unwitting, suporting participant for the status quo. Its no wonder I pay 200.00 a week for a psychologist to convince me to keep going.From the clothes, cars, houses, etc. i gravitate to buying, to the marching orders i execute at the behest of our glorius information providers, I'm not feeling real positive today. I have accepted the un-acceptable. My peers can accept sending people to die,George Bush in their bedrooms, And the impoverishing of their friends and families, but they can't accept their neighbors smoking pot.
Posted by:Gordon.Tucker@verizon.netAugust 19, 2007 5:36:32 AMRespond ^
Please contact me regarding some truth the American people should know, People are sold into finacial slavery at birth, and people don't recognise the truth behind it, hidden in words of code, the truth can be seen, if you'd like to know more please contact me, ajsotr7@earthlink.net
Posted by:Tony SmithAugust 19, 2007 6:02:16 AMRespond ^
Gary Greenberg's "Gay by Choice" , for all its good intentions, risks misrepresenting the scientific consensus about "therapy" of homosexuality. Most argument about homosexuality being a "choice" is coming from religious groups,not from science. The majority opinion among experts is that sexual orientation is difficult, at best, to change, if such a thing is really possible at all. It is not good science to focus on anecdotal claims from anonymous sources, as Greenberg did immediately, to being his article. There are many "ex-gays" who swear that they have changed orientation. There have also been embarrassing incidents of "reformed" gays who were caught seeking sneaking into gay establishments. Roy Cohn, once counsel to Senator Joe McCarthy, insisted that he was not gay. He also swore until his dying day that he did not have AIDS, even as he was seeking aggressive drug treatments for it. Talk is cheap; denial is deep. The real test of the "ex-gay " movement will be when scientists can do brain scans and measure involuntary responses to erotic stimuli. At this point in time, no "ex-gays" have any real business holding themselves up as "living proof" that all gays can change. Even if their claim were true, it does not follow that what is true for one individual is necessarily true for another. It would be best to put the unprovable claims and armchair theories aside, and wait until the hard science is available. Meanwhile, Mother Jones could better spend its valuable space by documenting the abuses that occur against gays and lesbians in jobs and housing, in many foreign countries, in Iraq, or in the courtrooms of America. Tom Keske
Posted by:Tom KeskeAugust 19, 2007 7:33:27 PMRespond ^
Letter to the Editor: AMERICANS FOR AMERICA WILL STAY VIGILANT PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION EVERY ONE NEEDS TO VOTE IN THE PRIMARIES: The assassination of PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY Nov. 22, 1963 began my interest in our Country and where it was going. The war on Organized crime, and proverty by the president and, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, has held my interest to this date. I became a Police Officer, always keeping in mind the above eliments, following the changes in the economy, and political controls that have since taken place. Trace back, remember private owned businesses, inter-city conditions, and what is now. The main thing to remember, is the presidents famous statement. Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your Country. Then Rev. Martin Luther King. I HAD A DREAM !! The following is the outline as I have seen it. I support Barack Obama as president 2008, because of the similarities to President Kennedy, and a refreshing reality to Rev. Kings dream. You may not agree, right now we have a right to disagree. BUT we may not have, if we do not protect our Constitution. The rest of my thoughts: John Edwards--Vice-President. One America. Dennis Kucinich-- Secretary of State. What a Statesman. Joe Biden-- Secretary of Defense. An Expert on Foreign Policy.. The Dream Team we need. Not more Polarization.. Thank You for Your Courtesy in reading what I, a plain concerned American Citizen, has to say. Ron Wal I retired after having reported wrongful activities, my confidential information exposed for politically motivated reasoning. Corruption starts at the local level. Money gained from the illegal markets of drugs, gambling, pronography, contracts, special interest invested in free enterprise affecting the economy. Such travels up the line to county, state, federal levels of government. We then end up as we have now, no accountibility, ethics, or real moral values. Citizen review boards, panels, Watch groups need to be established all the way up the line. Written by a non-professional, but with the same concerns as any citizen wondering what has happened gradually over the last 60 years to end up at a junction for such FASCISM.... We need change, not more polarization Who is accountable for Rubber Stamping the President's disastrous policies for America. Not only republicans give him the green light. Ron Wal
Posted by:RON WALAugust 22, 2007 8:15:33 AMRespond ^
Re: Ken Burns and his WWII documentary, and Mother Jones To the Editor: "Mother Jones has the right to hire anyone it wants - to exclude Latinos from the editorial board=ADwhich it does. However, it does not have the right to call itself a leftist journal. Leftist are not supposed to discriminate - and ignorance of issues is a sign of discrimination."-- Prof. Rodolfo Acuna, Cal State Northridge, in a letter to the editors of Mother Jones, on Aug. 16, 2007, excoriating the magazine for publishing a puff piece about Ken Burns, without mentioning the controversy on Burn's last-minute inclusion of Latinos. See the entire letter at Defendthehonor.org. How would you respond to the above list serv posting? Thank you, CR Holguin
Posted by:Claudia HolguinAugust 24, 2007 1:58:17 PMRespond ^
REAGAN & TERRORISM by Larry S. Rolirad President Reagan did nothing to stop terrorism. He did however put our soldiers in harm's way to be slaughtered by suicide bombers. Reagan is responsible for the slaughter of 245 Marines he sent to Lebanon. Reagan also issued orders to our Marines that they could not react in-kind to any attacks. President Reagan essentially prevented them from defending themselves. Soon after a a lone suicide driver of a truck filled with bombs crashed through a weakly guarded facility and detonated his cargo of death killing 245 Marines in their sleep President Reagan ordered our military out of Lebanon. After the withdrawal Reagan issued the following statement: "As long as there is a chance we are not bugging out. We are moving to deploy into a more defensive position". Not one republican has ever condemned Reagan for his blunderous participation in the slaughter of 245 Marines. And not one republican has cited Reagan's quote above as it pertains to the current war in Iraq. It is obvious that we should never have invaded Iraq but now it is time to withdraw and deploy our forces to a more defensive position, like bringing them home to America to defend our nation's borders. After all, that is what our military is supposed to be used for, to defend and protect the United States and the American people. Fighting and dying in a country which never posed any threat to the United States is NOT how our military is supposed to be used. It is also repugnant that the current Bush Regime is using our military as low-paid mercenaries only in Iraq to protect the financial interests of corrupt corporations, which are getting multi-billion dollar no-bid contracts directly from Bush and Cheney, two of the most corrupt and evil thugs to ever hold political office in the United States. Republicans love to cite Reagan and treat him like a god but even Reagan knew when to cut his loses. After withdrawing our military from certain death in Lebanon Reagan said "Once the terrorist attacks started there was no way that we could really contribute to the original mission by staying there as a target just bunkering down and waiting for further attacks." Can anyone imagine the one-dimensional, bull-headed GW Bush changing his position on Iraq? Republicans constantly attack any democrat who changes their position as a flip flopper, but they never call any of their party members such names, even their "god" Reagan after he 'flip flopped' on his Lebanon policy. Perhaps Ronald Reagan's eleventh commandment "Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow republican" prevents republicans from being honest and holding others in their political party accountable for their actions. Or perhaps they prefer to just spew their venom outward to anyone who disagrees with their policies. After all, the attack machine in the republican party is always in high gear ready to pounce on anyone who dares speak out against them. They have smeared and condemned war heroes like Democratic senators Max Cleland and John Murtha. They have savagely attacked retired generals who dare to speak out against the Iraq War. There are no depths too low that the republican party will not descent to stop the truth from being told. Like a rattlesnake, their venom is released with precision and with great effectiveness at any perceived enemy of their deviant policy. If there is any consistency in the republican party it is that of inconsistency, an inconsistency that is entangled in a slow dance with total hypocrisy. Sources: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/ dates/stories/february/26/newsid_4153000/4153013.stm
Posted by:Larry S. RoliradAugust 27, 2007 5:25:34 PMRespond ^
Does even a single damn one of you recall the World Trade Center??
Posted by:Paul WestAugust 31, 2007 9:55:12 AMRespond ^
Here is an alternative view of the film "Ghosts of Cite Solie;" to that presented in the description/review by Julia M. Klein in your August issue. I hope you will print this article. Thank you. Diana Bohn Berkeley Ghosts of Cite Soleil: Leni Riefenstahl Goes to Haiti The director is Danish, not German, but Ghosts of Cite Soleil makes heroes of the made-in-Washington leaders of Haiti’s 2004 coup in a manner reminiscent of Leni Riefenstahl’s adoration for Adolf Hitler in her famous film from the 1930’s, Triumph of the Will. It builds a web of lies - lies of omission and lies of commission - into the "Big Lie" - a stylized, decontextualized, post-modern, sexy/violent piece of propaganda disguised as a documentary, full of guns but signifying nothing. Ghosts of Cite Soleil claims to reveal the intimate personal lives of two gangsters who are brothers, Bily and 2Pac, in the deprived Cite Soleil neighborhood of Port-au-Prince. When introducing them to several foreign journalists, filmmaker Kevin Pina (Harvest of Hope, Haiti: We Must Kill the Bandits) made the following comment, "Billy and I had a falling out over the question of his accepting money from foreign journalists to hype this question of Aristide and gangsters. The more they paid the more outlandish became his claims . . ." The director, Asger Leth, would have us believe the majority of people of Cite Soleil don’t support President Aristide, and that those who do are forced to do so by armed gangsters. He ignores the fact that Aristide was twice elected by huge majorities in country-wide elections, and that massive pro-Aristide demonstrations have taken place in Cite Soliel repeatedly since the coup. In one scene, a Cite Soleil crowd shouts, "Five full years, Five full years." Leth translates, but does not explain the significance - the people want Aristide back to finish his full five-year term. The film doesn't tell us that "Opposition leaders" Andy Apaid and Charles Henry Baker are also sweatshop owners who hate Aristide because he wanted to raise the minimum wage and make them pay taxes, which the rich don’t do in Haiti. We’re told President Aristide left voluntarily - no mention of his kidnapping by the U.S. military and his ongoing banishment from the continent. We see jubilant crowds of Aristide opponents waving as the coup makers drive into town, giving the impression most Haitians supported the coup. We don’t see the U.S./French/Canadian soldiers guarding the route and making the entrance possible. We don’t learn that Port-au-Prince was totally defended the day of Aristide’s kidnapping, and the coup leaders would never have been able to take it over militarily. Instead Uncle Sam came to the rescue. We’re not told that Louis Jodel Chamblain worked with the Duvalier dictatorship’s brutal militia, the Tonton Macoutes, in the 1980s; that following a military coup against Aristide in 1991, he was the "operations guy" for the FRAPH paramilitary death squad, accused of murdering uncounted numbers of Aristide supporters and introducing gang rape into Haiti as a military weapon. We’re not told that Guy Phillipe is a former Haitian police chief who was trained by US Special Forces in Ecuador in the early 1990s, or that the U.S. embassy admitted that Phillipe was involved in the transhipment of narcotics, one of the key sources of funds for paramilitary attacks on the poor in Haiti. He says the man he most admires is former Chilean dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet. Leth portrays both of these men as credible spokespersons, not gangsters. Where did the weapons of the coup-makers come from? Who organized and trained them? Who spent tens of millions of dollars to create an "opposition movement" in Haiti? The United States is the real ghost in this film - it simply does not exist, except for its official version of events, scripted by George W. Bush, which Ghosts of Cite Soleil follows scrupulously. Ghosts of Cite Soleil plays like a manipulative music video, featuring music by Haitian rapper Wyclef Jean, also the executive producer, who supported the coup and pushed the State Department line among the conscious hip-hop community and progressive celebrities in Hollywood. This contrasts to the principled stand of Danny Glover, Ruby Dee and her late, great husband Ossie Davis. You can almost hear the violins behind Chamblain, as he talks about his return to Haiti, but the music becomes dissonant and menacing behind Aristide or behind 2Pac and Bily, who speak English no less, but we never learn why. Like we never learn who, or why about anything in this movie, a piece of soft core propaganda, cleverly, consciously, and seductively made. Candy may be sweet, but it rots your teeth. by Charlie Hinton Haiti Action Committee
Posted by:Diana BohonSeptember 3, 2007 7:38:23 PMRespond ^
Achieving the Impossible: A Stable Iraq in 12 to 24 Months (An Igbo/Biafara Solution) On Wednesday, September 26, 2007, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly supported a bipartisan plan for a political settlement in Iraq, passing a measure proposed by Sen. Joe Biden to promote a federal political system with a weak central government and three regional states, a step in the right direction of finally resolving a very vexing problem that has cost the tax payers billions of dollars and unless resolved will run into the trillions of dollars not including the already incurred long term costs. With the approval of nearly 200 billions dollars for the fiscal year 2008, the estimated cost of the Iraqi war is now close to 800 billion dollars. Can the United States continue to spend the taxpayers’ money in just Iraq at such a tremendous clip into the foreseeable future with no end in sight? The presidential candidates of both the Republican and Democratic parties continue to show that they are yet to embrace a significant draw down of American troops from Iraq in the near future even with the bipartisan approval of the Biden plan. The unfounded and false premise by all experts and both parties that there is/are no easy solution(s) to the Iraqi dilemma has now become part of the American psyche. Of course there is an easy solution if we know what to look for and more importantly a painless draw down can be implemented in 12 to 24 months! Using the Biden plan, can an honorable and complete US troop draw down be accomplished in 12 to 24 months that will satisfy all concerns of the American people, and of both parties? § Create a more stable and independent Iraq § Resolve the sectarian violence and the civil war § Prevent Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups from establishing a beachhead in Iraq § Prevent further ethnic cleansing or genocide in Iraq § Satisfy all and every other unlisted reasonable concerns that will not compromise the Iraqi sovereignty The answer is resoundingly yes. Below is a proposed framework on a stated solution to the Iraqi dilemma that I had e-mailed to the GAO, some news media and discussion groups proposing an outline on how this can be achieved many months before the approval of the Biden plan by the senate: TACKLING THE IRAQI PROBLEM HEAD-ON: The only Honorable, Acceptable and Long-lasting Solution. (An Igbo/Biafara perspective) The Igbo (Ibo, Ebo, Egbo, Hebo, ...), a nation that call themselves Ndi Mbu (the first people created), Ndi Gboo (the ancient people), Umu Chukwu (the sons and daughters of the Most High), Ndi Eze (kings and queens), and the human being they call Mma Ndu (the beauty of life or the masterpiece of life), have sayings that are well tested and thousands of years old, below are some of them: Oha Ka - The people are supreme Eziokwu bu ndu - Truth = Life Odi be ndi - Respect for the way of life of other peoples or nations Egbe belu Ugo belu - The inalienable right of both the strong and the weak to co-exist in peace Using the ageless wisdom and philosophy of my forefathers, the above proven philosophical truths or axioms, I will seek to produce a framework (general outline) for the resolution of the Iraqi dilemma. It is my hope that this will help move the debate of the Iraqi crisis towards a speedy and fair resolution. The American people have spoken loudly and clearly, they demand the end of the Iraqi project/experiment FORTHWITH! To produce a lasting and holistic solution below are some of the conditions that must be met, § Genocide or ethnic cleansing is not acceptable and must not be condoned § All Iraqi political and religious leaders must be identified and put on notice that, o Any Iraqi leader whose followers are involved in ethnic cleansing will be persecuted to the fullest and held accountable (Accountability) § The new Iraq by all measurements must be better than the old Iraq § Terrorists and their organizations whether home grown or imported must not gain a foot hold in Iraq § The independence and sovereignty of Iraq as a nation cannot be compromised as long as the composite peoples that make up Iraq agree to continue as one § Iraqi natural resources cannot be negotiated away § Any solution must be based on truth, so that each section will accept the outcome § The right of all the peoples of Iraq to co-exist in peace cannot be compromised Having set out a solid foundation for the process of lasting peace in Iraq we can now begin to lay out the solution. As senator Biden continue to remind us, the solution is already contained in the new Iraqi constitution - a loose federation. The Kurds are already implementing this solution in their region. The question then is how to implement this solution in all Iraq with the least amount of pain. Areas of Interest Non Mixed Areas - Areas with 80% (?) or more of the same group Mixed Areas - Areas with no defined majority Care must be taken to make sure that ethnic cleansing is not implemented in any of the areas as control is gradually transferred to any of the groups. The goal is to convert Iraq into regions which will give the peoples, be they Sunni, Shiite or Kurds a stake in their own region, importantly they themselves will govern themselves. As can be seen, the solution is a bottom up instead of a top down solution (you build from ground up) - all fundamentally sound governments are built from ground up. This should explain why the current government of Iraq remains unpopular and coming apart at the seams. Implementation From the period a plan is worked out and accepted to not more than three months after congress and the president have come to an agreement, the regions would have been identified and put in place. This will give the Iraqis a sense of ownership, something that is lacking at present. Areas of contention can be labeled as federal territories that will be administered by a mix of Iraqis and an international coalition. As control is gradually handed over in the non-mixed areas, most of the US troops in these areas will be re-deployed to the mixed areas. An international coalition of troops will be put together to replace the US troops as they are drawn down. A draw down of the US troops will begin as soon as the president and congress agree on a date, at a pace determined by the US military leaders until 90% (?) of the troops have been drawn down. The 10% (?) left will be part of the international coalition that will help Iraq towards a peaceful transition. Benefits § The Saddam's Sunni disbanded army with a two week re-training can be tapped into § Gains being made in the Sunni areas will become permanent § Both the Sunni and the Shiite will now turn their illegal standing armies inwards towards implementing the rule of law, instead of genocide against each other when the US army eventually pulls out § The trained Shiite army can now be redeployed to the Shiite areas § This is the most effective, fastest, most honorable, stable and the only way to bring about a draw down of the US army in the shortest and fastest time § This plan meets all the stated goals, conditions and concerns of the American people § This plan makes it impossible for either home grown or imported terrorist groups to establish a foothold in Iraq § This will surely check Iran's emergence as a major power in this area. Maazi Nnaemeka Mene Onumonu-Uzoaru An Igbo/Biafara Analyst, Strategist and Long Range Planner Member: Ekwe Nche Research Institute/Organization A 501 (c3) organization Website: www.ekwenche.org E-mail: ekwenche@hotmail.com The map below from http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/ pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/NEWS/709270381 shows the three proposed regions (Kurds, Sunni and Shiite) and the two areas of concern, mixed areas (Areas of contention that will be labeled as federal territories that will be administered by a mix of Iraqis and an international coalition) – the Kurds/Sunni and Sunni/Shiite areas, this also includes the capital Bagdad. To re-emphasize, a real solution is a very easy possibility and can be completed within 12 to 24 months if the proposed framework which must include a re-examination of the Igbo philosophical truths or axioms that have been tested and proven to be sound and correct for thousands of years, on which this proposal is built on. Unless this is accepted, the government will continue a yearly expenditure of not less than 100 billion dollars for each year into the foreseeable future, not including the continuing loss in lives, that a monetary value cannot be put on, with no end in sight. Maazi Nnaemeka Mene Onumonu-Uzoaru E-mail: onumonu@hotmail.com An Igbo/Biafara Analyst, Strategist and Long Range Planner Member: Ekwe Nche Research Institute/Organization A 501 (c3) organization Website: www.ekwenche.org E-mail: ekwenche@hotmail.com
Posted by:Maazi OnumonuOctober 1, 2007 11:53:32 AMRespond ^
Mother Jones editors so chopped my comment that it was substantially changed in meaning. Consequently, I submit the letter as originally written: This morning my father-in-law handed me his Mother Jones magazine and said I should read the article about Ave Maria college. I looked forward to taking a few minutes to do this. I don't know much about Ave Maria, but have heard it is generally regarded as among the more authentically-Catholic colleges in the USA, where most others have drifted away from their Catholic (and Protestant) origins in one direction or another. Bill Donahue is clearly able to turn a decent sentence and, as is so popular in journalism these days, say what he really wishes to say without ever actually saying it (or find other people to say it for him). However, it might have saved some ink if he had just written one line. "I think Ave Maria is stupid, backwards and silly," would have summed his general message. But that wouldn't have sounded very sophisticated, would it? Instead, we received five pages of carefully crafted short stories and filler to make us feel like Ave Maria is, well, stupid, backwards and silly. Like watching a skillfully acted movie or play, it is interesting to read something that is well written, regardless of the message, but I was ultimately disappointed because I didn't actually learn anything useful about Ave Maria. All I really learned about was the author; between his arrogance and obvious ignorance of actual Catholicism -- an unfortunate, insuperable combination of traits -- all an astute reader will come away with is that Bill feels really uncomfortable about Ave Maria. Apparently, if we can't do away with those who make us uncomfortable, and if we're not willing to make any attempt to actually understand their points of view, there is money to be made and satisfaction to be had in artfully mocking them and everything they believe in. How sad.
Posted by:Seth MurrayNovember 9, 2007 11:05:40 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















Sarah Palin on Iraq

More Reaction to Palin

Friday Cat Blogging - 29 August 2008

Nowhere to Go


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS