The Power and the Story

What's a good way of predicting presidential races? Find the candidate with the best story to tell.

Forget who's got the bigger "war chest," it's the candidate with the best story to tell who's got the real advantage in presidential politics. Armed with this provocative thesis, historian Evan Cornog proceeds to reexamine pivotal presidential elections as a battle between the candidates' life narratives. Andrew Jackson, for example, was catapulted to enduring fame (and viable candidacy) in 1815, when he triumphed over a superior British force at the Battle of New Orleans. Never mind that the conflict, coming two weeks after the formal conclusion of the War of 1812, was militarily irrelevant.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

That story, and many that follow, in Cor- nog's long (and repetitious) volume point to a disturbing trend: what Cornog calls "the relative unimportance of truth." From George Washington's cherry tree to George W. Bush's conflation of 9/11 and Saddam Hussein, it's clear, "A good story trumps a true story almost any day."

Cornog occasionally oversells his point, yet this is an important and deeply disturbing work, as it fully explores the decisive power of myth in our choosing of a national leader. This is a truly disheartening view in our media- defined era: It's not, "May the best man win"; it's more like, "May the best storyteller (or spinmeister) prevail."

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.