As Tom Tommorow points out, if Katrina makes anything clear, the federal governmentHomeland Security, FEMA, the DoD, whateverhas no plan to deal with a major disaster, terrorist or otherwise. Think about it: after an catastrophic eventand this one, at least, was entirely predictablewe've got a major city degenerating into lawlessness, with conditions that make bringing medical attention and other forms of relief very difficult.
That's an accurate description of what's going on in New Orleans now. But it could also describe what might happen in the aftermath of say, a dirty bomb or a biological, chemical, or nuclear attack. Of course there are some differences. But think of the similarities in what would look like an adequate response. Where is the fleet of helicopters? Where are the plans to press gang every bus in a 500-mile radius? Where are the airlift-ready hospitals, water sanitation plants, and tents? Where are the air drops of non-perishable food?
These things are costly. But considering all the talk we've heard over the last four years about the imminence of such a terrorist attack, the constant jiggering of threat level indicators, and the billions supposedly spent on homeland security, you'd think we'd have a plan. But there's only one conclusion:
There is no plan.