- ‹ previous
- 6024 of 8849
- next ›
The Changing Dynamics of the Chuck Hagel Phenomenon
Newsweek has a long and glowing article about Chuck Hagel (R-NE), his presidential chances, and his path from Midwestern boyhood to the corridors of the Senate. Sample sentence: "He is manly, Middle American and when he talks about military matters, he exudes the cool confidence of a warrior-statesman who knows that war is hell."
The one piece of information from the article that I didn't know, other than all the biographical information, is this: "According to Congressional Quarterly, [Hagel] voted with the White House more times in 2006 than any other senator." I guess I was so agog over the chutzpah Hagel has displayed in loudly and continuously objecting to the war and the Bush Administration that I neglected to closely examine the man's record. Hagel's Planned Parenthood rating: 0%. Secular Coalition for America rating: 0%. Darfur Scoreboard grade: C. League of Conservation Voters rating: 14%. Human Rights Campaign (gay rights) rating: 0. The man supports a constitutional amendment to ban the burning of the flag.
So for all his tough (and seductively honest) talk about Iraq, I would have a hard time disagreeing more completely with his politics. That said, I think if conservative Americans get to know Hagel they'll find him pretty appealing. He's got a strong conservative record on social and economic issues (as I just learned) and yet has led the charge against a war and a president that even Republicans are deserting. He's a decorated veteran -- which is a huge 180 from Bush, Cheney, Feith, Wolfowitz, and the rest of the "other priorities" brigade -- and actually saved his brother's life in Vietnam. He grew up in the Midwest (take that, Obama!) and had parents that "taught their boys that loyalty to country was paramount."
And so Hagel is shaping up like the McCain of 2000, with the media taking it upon themselves to explain to the American people why they are missing a great candidate who -- unbeknownst to everyone outside the inner circle -- has presidential stuff. (Mickey Kaus is the only one puncturing the balloon.) Two weeks ago, Jonathan Alter wrote an article on Hagel for Newsweek cautiously titled "Hagel Could Have a Shot." Now, as you can see from the Newsweek profile, this GQ interview, and this truthdig column, his media treatment has drastically changed.
But here's what will hurt Hagel:
When the Senate debated a resolution authorizing the administration to use force to remove Saddam, Hagel took to the Senate floor and spoke in damning, eloquent terms of the folly of the whole affair. He then proceeded to grant the president the authority he needed. It was a painful contortionone that could hurt him in a presidential contestperhaps understood only by those who knew Hagel best. "I'm sure in the end it was, 'Damn, he's my president'," Tom says of his brother's vote. "It was, 'I have strong doubts about things, but I can't be disloyal'."
That's the Colin Powell defense, and it's just not good enough. When you have moral reservations about something as important as war, and when you have been to war and know the toll it takes on young soldiers and the country that sends them, you bear an even greater responsibility to stand up. When you are not driven by ideology or a crazed obsession with deposing a crackpot dictator, and can think seriously about the merits of such an adventure, you are in position to put the breaks on. I recognize that Congress didn't have much power to stop Bush and Co., but Hagel had an obligation to vote his conscience.
In the end, though, any guy that irritates Dick Cheney this much can't be all bad:
Asked about Hagel last week in an interview with Newsweek, Vice President Dick Cheney said: "I believe firmly in Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment: THOU SHALT NOT SPEAK ILL OF A FELLOW REPUBLICAN. But it's very hard sometimes to adhere to that where Chuck Hagel is involved."




























Senator Hagel is the only presidential candidate that is not in the pocket of AIPAC. I think that speaks to his independence more than anything.
Chuck Hagel has more of a shot than prognosticators of an election many months away give him.
There are many independents and former Democrats, such as myself, of a libertarian mind who have been wandering the wilderness in search of "something else". We are descendants of a now extinct species, "Conservatis Democratis" who after years of waiting for John Kennedy to show up, left the Democratic Party, more aptly named The Socialist Party of the Graying Ponytail.
Also wandering about looking for a home are refugees from George Bush's version of the Republican Party, disgusted with the fundamentalist yahoo straightjacket coupled with military adventuring and free-spending ways that would make LBJ blush with shame.
Mother Jones, Daily Kos and Nation stalwarts may not vote for him, but the 30 % of us in the electorate who aren't thrilled with the current version of either party might very well vote for Mr. Hagel. And if the "Praise only our version of Jeeeesus faction" of the Republicans won't let Hagel in the front of the bus, then perhaps at long last its time for a third party?
It's definately time for change, either more parties or no parties. I personally don't believe in party politics. My only alligence is to the constitution, IT IS MY COUNTRY! I will be looking for someone who is willing to restore the constitutional government!
In 1996, according to the Washington Post, the biggest upset landslide victory in the U.S. was won by Chuck Hagel. What Hagel failed to mention to the press (or reveal in his required disclosure documents) was that he had up to $5 million invested in, and had been the CEO of, the voting machine company whose machines elected him. Election Systems & Software (then called American Information Systems) was owned by Hagel and a company run by Hagel's campaign finance director, Michael McCarthy, and the machines counted an estimated 80 percent of Hagel's votes.
Source Blackboxvoting.com
I think Hagel seems like a good guy. I know a lot of you Nader voters here will probably disagree... I think you have to look beyond the label of democrat or republican because there are plenty of lousy politicians in both parties. I definitely don't agree with the hard line evangelical right wing nor do I care for the nonsense of the hippy, crunchy lefties calling for socialism and bigger government. Hagel seems pretty solid and reasonable. I can't stand McCain- that dude has some screws loose. I don't want him running this country- he is one person who manages to kiss Bush's [expletive deleted] and at the same time try and distance himself. Jon Stewart needs to stop inviting him on the daily show.. McCain is a has-been..