- ‹ previous
- 757 of 8902
- next ›
Detained Writer's Mother Jones Piece Now Online
This morning, Mother Jones published a major investigative article by Shane Bauer, a journalist who is one of the three American hikers detained in Iran after accidentally crossing the border while hiking in Kurdistan. The story, in the magazine's September/October issue, was reported earlier this year and went to press before Bauer was detained on July 31. But with the issue arriving in subscribers' homes this week, we decided, in consultation with Bauer's family and the families of the other hikers, to release it simultaneously online. We felt it was important to avoid speculation and mischaracterization about the story, and to showcase the kind of top-notch journalism Bauer has been producing.
Based on numerous interviews and government documents, Bauer's article, “The Sheikh Down,” finds that millions in reconstruction funding have been used to award inflated contracts to Sunni sheikhs to keep them and their followers from taking up arms against US troops. “The program was a major part of the Awakening, which the Pentagon has touted as a turning point in reducing violence and creating the conditions for an American withdrawal,” Bauer reports. “It was also a reinstitution of a strategy started by Saddam Hussein, who picked out tribal leaders he could manipulate through patronage schemes. The US military didn't give the sheikhs straight-up bribes, which would have raised eyebrows in Washington. Instead, it handed out reconstruction contracts. Sometimes issued at three or four times market value, the contracts have been the grease in the wheels of the Awakening in Anbar—the almost entirely Sunni province in western Iraq where Fallujah is located.”
The program has had little oversight from Washington—battalion commanders are allowed to hand out contracts up to $500,000 without approval from their superiors. In one case Bauer examines, a clinic described by his military sources as a “patronage project,” a Sunni sheikh was paid $488,000. “Yet Hastings estimates that it will cost around $100,000 to build,” Bauer writes. “’That's, you know, a pretty good profit margin,’ Hastings says—close to 80 percent. In comparison, KBR, the largest military contractor in the country, cleared 3 percent in profits in 2008. Halliburton scored around 14 percent.”
While some officials defend the “make-a-sheikh” program as business as usual in a country rife with corruption, many experts warn that it could destabilize Iraq in the long term. Peter Harling, senior Middle East analyst with the International Crisis Group, tells Bauer, “The pillaging of state resources is not a particularly good strategy. It creates a culture of predators and a lot of resentment from those who don't take part in those contracts. You might lavish one tribal leader with contracts but alienate 10 others.” Sam Parker, an Iraq programs officer at the United States Institute of Peace, is also concerned that the strategy could backfire. “Contracts are inflated because they are only secondarily about the goods and services received,” he tells Bauer. "It's very problematic. You are rewarding the guys with the guns.”
You can read Shane's whole story here. Our thoughts are with him, Sarah Shourd, Josh Fattal, and all of their families. We won't be discussing their case publicly at this time.
Clara Jeffery and Monika Bauerlein are Co-Editors of Mother Jones. You can read more of their articles here and here and follow them on Twitter here and here.





























The real story with Sec. of State
All matters over seas has to be put a side. Clinton has something to say and she is mad:
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/08/obama%E2%80%99s-first-clinton-embarr...
hikers, Shane Bauer
tagged as:- solution
I think the Mother Jones editors might consider telling their readers the truth about the jailing of the reporter who wrote this story. The truth is that it is highly unlikely that Shane Bauer and his friends wandered inadvertently into Iran. The truth is that he's a free lance reporter, in search of the big story, wants to be famous, and will do what it takes, regardless of his own safety, the safety of his friends, and the rescue efforts others will have to make on his behalf.
I know this because he did the same thing in Yemen in 2005--more than once. Back then, everyone told him not to travel into the North of Yemen, that it was too dangerous, that he didn't know the territory well enough, etc. etc. Other people told him: "you ought to try to learn how to report out a story here in Sana'a, where it is safe." (He was just beginning as a reporter then and really did not know.) When he was jailed, as everyone knew he would be, his Yemeni fixers took the brunt of the punishment: year long sentences, fines, etc.. As an American, you basically get out of jail free in Yemen. But for locals who do illegal things on behalf of foreigners--they can lose everything. These people did. Here is the special plea the CPJ made for Shane back then: http://cpj.org/2006/02/attacks-on-the-press-2005-yemen.php
Point 2: I'm all for adventurous, brave reporting. But if the reporters get caught doing something silly, shouldn't they then say, "Gee, I got caught doing something silly. Sorry."? That's not at all what Shane and his friends are saying now. "We were lost. We were hikers. We didn't know what we were doing."
Well, which is it? Clueless hikers? Or ambitious reporters? I'll settle for a compromise. Clueless reporters. Since everyone who knows Shane Bauer knows that the "We just hiked accidentally into Iran" story is almost certainly a lie, why do they repeat it so often? Are they trying to protect him from the Iranians? But the Irananians are not dumb. Lying to them makes them distrust us further. Anyway, the Mother Jones editors are fudging. This fudging damages our trust in the articles that appear in Mother Jones.
The bigger issue is this: good reporting from foreign countries doesn't come cheap. Editors, however, do want cheap. Now this desire for cheap has encouraged a young person with an inclination for risk taking to get himself AND HIS FRIENDS into deep international trouble. For THE SECOND TIME in four years. Surely, this is not what Mother Jones wants, is it? Let the young people learn the ropes somewhere safe. When they are in over their heads, do not encourage them to go in deeper.
But we didn't know he was in over his head, you say. You might have looked. Do a google search. Ask the CPJ. Ask any one of the dozens who tried to release Shane from jail back in 2005.
Sometimes, it's best not to help young people help themselves.