- ‹ previous
- 62 of 8902
- next ›
What Melody Barnes Said About Gay Marriage
Earlier this week an appearance by White House director of domestic policy Melody Barnes at Boston College's School of Law created something of a controversy. The Huffington Post reported that Barnes "implicitly acknowledged" her support for gay marriage at the event. If true, this would possibly make her the first high-profile administration official to break publicly with Obama's stated belief that marriage is between a man and a woman. An anonymous White House official quickly denied the account, claiming that Barnes didn't discuss "her personal views on marriage equality or other issues." Attendees of the event contacted by HuffPo offered varying impressions of what Barnes actually said: one said she "did state that she supports marriage equality;" others recall her answer being less explicit.
Mother Jones has obtained a transcript of the event and Barnes certainly implied that she and President Obama have a difference of opinion when it comes to gay marriage. Barnes was asked "whether you support equal civil marriage rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and if so, are you speaking or will you speak with President Obama on this civil rights matter?"
Barnes began by describing what the President is doing to promote gay rights—he has, she said, indicated that he wants to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and "encourage changes in the military." Then she returned to the original subject of the question—marriage equality: "I accept that that is very different than what you're talking about." She proceeded: "With regard to my own views, those are my own views. And I come to my own experience based on what I've learned, based on the relationships I've had with friends and their relationships that I respect, the children that they're raising, and that is something that I support."
Barnes then suggested that she and the president have different views on the issue of gay marriage: "He hasn't articulated a shift in his position there and that is something that at this moment I accept. It is what it is, even as we continue to have a conversation with him about it."
Her answer wasn't as direct as it could have been. But when talking about marriage, she said, "that is something that I support." Perhaps it could be claimed that she was referring only to the relationships of her friends—but her remarks also indicate that she and Obama hold different views on this issue. If Barnes does back gay marriage—which would not be terribly surprising for an Obama official—it's not a big deal. But why was the White House so quick to deny that she'd even discussed her own thoughts on the matter?
The video will be posted on Boston College's website later this afternoon; a full transcript of the exchange is after the jump:
Question: I know there isn’t much you can say right now because you know it is your job to defend President Obama..(laughter) even if I think he is 100 percent wrong on this domestic policy stance, but what I would like to know is whether you support equal civil marriage rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and if so, are you speaking or will you speak with President Obama on this civil rights matter?
Melody Barnes: Sure, and I appreciate your question. And I also belong to the United Church of Christ. And I guess I would respond in a couple of different ways. One, I appreciate, I really appreciate your frustration and your disappointment with the president’s position on this issue. He has taken a position and at the same time he has also articulated the number of ways he wants to try and move the ball forward, for gay, lesbian and transgendered Americans, including signing the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act and a whole host of other things that we’ve started to do to model as a leader in terms of what the federal government is doing, as well as to encourage changes both in the military and in the work place, and certainly with regard to hate crimes.
I accept that that is very different than what you’re talking about, and what you’re talking about is something that’s quite fundamental. With regard to my own views, those are my own views. And I come to my own experience based on what I’ve learned, based on the relationships I’ve had with friends and their relationships that I respect, the children that they’re raising, and that is something that I support. But at the same time when I walk into the White House, though I work to put all arguments in front of the president, as you say, I also work for the president. I also have very robust policy conversations, very robust constitutional conversations with the White House council, and others about these issues, and we’ll see what happens from there. At this point all I can say to you are that his plans are to move the ball forward in the ways that I’ve described, he hasn’t articulated a shift in his position there and that is something that at this moment I accept, it is what it is, even as we continue to have a conversation with him about it.





























Obama is to the right of
Obama is to the right of Dick Cheney on this one. Typically shameful performance.
More Obama Drama
I am inclined to like the guy, but he sure does make it difficult acting as impotently as Jimmy Carter and as shamelessly oblique as Bill Clinton.
Enjoy.
http://www.patekphilippewatches.us/Graham/
The structure
Audemars Piguet replica
Bell & Ross replica
Breguet replica
Breitling replica
Burberry replica
Bvlgari replica
Cartier replica
chopard replica
croum replica
DeWitt replica
ebel replica
Ferrari replica
Franck Muller replica
Graham replica
Hermes replica
Hublot replica
IWC replica
Jaquet droz replica
Lady replica
Longines replica
Louis Vuitton replica
of every mechanical movement is very sophisticated so the watches not only would have several special features but would also show precision timekeeping.
amazing fake watches
ion fake rolex watches a farther “Quick Fake BMW watches Fix” option, your Montblanc NZ130-A1251 car entrust exhibit sale Fake Bell&Ross watch dispatch to huge cheap Fake Elini strength, lost the Fake Ulysse Nardin watches perfect tell calling. fake breitling watch outlet A further manifestation cheap Monaco watch for sale of choice being cheap Fake Girard-Perregaux Fake Girard-Perregaux is that if fake watches Fake Hermes you gang around Bvlgari replica 1061 the "Quick Fix" imitation Luminor Base 44mm option, you won’t fake watch solve the capacious Fake Blancpain for sale hand you would fake rolex normally negotiate if fake Fake D&G watch for sale you leader to fake tag hauer watch outlet your garage ROLEX-W027 fake watch Fake Girard-Perregaux watch for sale
Melody Barnes on Gay Marriage.
tagged as:- result
It's always amazing to me how delusional liberals can be. You keep talking about rights and how this is a matter of rights and how rights aren't being acknowledged...OUTSIDE OF OTHER LIBERALS NO ONE HAS EVER GIVEN YOU THE IMPRESSION THAT THIS IS A CIVIL RIGHT.
I mean, you're asserting for people something that well over half the people in this country would totally disagree with. And I know you think that since blacks in the 50s and 60s asserted they had civil rights that you get to do it now sans any type of empirical consensus. But whereas blacks can look back through history and point out actual, codified rights that were denied to them, all liberals can do with gay marriage is try and use legal fabrications and double-speak to make their point.
156 Chinese protesters
156 Chinese protesters killed before Obama's arrival
http://joshfulton.blogspot.com/2009/11/china-jails-dissidents-before-oba...
156 Chinese protesters
156 Chinese protesters killed before Obama's arrival
http://joshfulton.blogspot.com/2009/11/china-jails-dissidents-before-oba...
disparaging!
who are we to judge people? pointing our fingers and accusing someone wether his acts are morally right or wrong.This is something that we people forgot, either our opinions, the presidents stand or whoever you call in the position doesn't matter. We really don't care because we are not in the position to talk about it. It is much appreciated if we care for our own acts and not others.. We must take into our own responsibilities in life and instead of this get a personal loan,business,personal lives must be attended to and not personal criticisms.We should think before we state any words and throwing it without even thinking and considering.
The 1st amendment and establishment clause?
While some might argue that, since all "major" religions condemn homosexuality, then establishment of legal contracts that involve sexual relationships that exclude homosexual partners do not establish religious supremacy. the fact is that government is - de facto - enforcing religious principles that are not supported by "less than pure" religious sects. Why do we use tax dollars to impose religious values on churches quite willing to enjoin people in a sacred contract - that gives them special rights and obligations not given to single people? As Dolly Parton would say: "Why shouldn't they [gay people] be just as miserable?"
The Libertarian solution is to end the government conferral of marriage certificates. Give out certificates of civil union and let the individual churches confer the marriage status based on their religious principles. We already confer obligations for adopted children of heterosexual couples by government fiat to balance special privileges [estate tax breaks, power of attorney, child custody, visitation etc]. We confer these privileges and obligations to protect and promote the interests of children - the future of our culture. When gay people willingly assume parental and spousal roles why should they be denied the legal tools to fulfill those obligations?
The bigger question is: why should government be dictating religious values that can't stand outside religious dogma? I could make a similar argument for Rastas - but the insidious "blowback" from pro crime drug policies are far more compelling than those of moral choice. Drug prohibition always creates more drug use, drug addiction, drug abuse, toxic drugs, crime, violence and public corruption. Unlike drug war advocates, I believe those are bad things. Personal choices are a very distant issue.
May God's will be done on earth and let it begin - and end - with myself. If it happens any other way it's not God's will.
Religion + Politics = Theocracy
The fact that this was at a Catholic University should deem it unimportant and invalid.
Its a shame that politicians and their cohorts bend backwards to make fundamentalists, like those who flew planes into the WTC on 9-11, any attention.
Its like saying FOX News is "Fair and Balanced".
the right of Dick Cheney on
the right of Dick Cheney on this one. Typically shameful performance.