Political MoJo

New Rule in High School: Say "Vagina," Get Suspended

| Wed Mar. 7, 2007 1:58 PM EST

Spotted on Feministing:

Saying the word "vagina" during a reading at a John Jay High School open mic session has resulted in suspension for three female students and has sparked a debate about censorship throughout the community.
School administrators had warned the girls it would be inappropriate to say the word while reading a selection from Eve Ensler's "The Vagina Monologues," but the students were willing to suffer the consequences.

Jeepers. Here's the news article. Thankfully, students and parents are organizing and speaking out -- they've already got a facebook group (the students) and a letter-writing campaign (the parents). The administrators of the school are saying that the issue isn't censorship, it's insubordination, which is kind of odd because the original ban on saying the word that the girls defied was censorship, no?

Eve Ensler has volunteered to go to the school and talk about the situation. Her quote to the press: "What is wrong about the word 'vagina,' which is the correct biological term for a body part? It is not slang. It is not dirty or racy. The fact that it was censored is an indication of exactly what is going on in American schools, where girls and boys are not being educated about their bodies in a healthy way. We're pushing everything into the closet. We need open, healthy sex education where girls know and love their bodies."

For the record, the offending V-word came in the verse: "My short skirt is a liberation flag in the women's army. I declare these streets, any streets, my vagina's country." The girls considered not saying the word, or holding up a sign with the world written on it, but in the end did "not feel they had the liberty to change a work of art."

Bravo, kids. Turn this whole thing into a wicked college application essay.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

U.S. Attorney In Arkansas Known For Committing Voting Rights Crime

| Wed Mar. 7, 2007 1:57 PM EST

In December of last year, George W. Bush chose Karl Rove's assistant, Timothy Griffin, to be the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Greg Palast writes today that the House Judiciary Committee missed a major scandal when it omitted Griffin's appointment from its agenda yesterday: Griffin, according to reporters from the BBC, was behind the scheme to disenfranchise 70,000 citizens in Florida in 2004.

Emails sent by Griffin, who was RNC Research Director, got into the hands of BBC Newsnight reporters. These emails led to the discovery of "caging" lists--spreadsheets containing the names of voters whose voting rights could be challenged. The voters were African American and Hispanic, and they all voted in Democratic precincts in Florida. Thousands of students, military personnel and homeless people were targeted, and many lost their vote. (It is interesting to note that while the RNC was throwing a fit about military votes being counted, it was also throwing potential military votes for Gore into the trash).

Palast reminds us that it is illegal to challenge voters en masse when race is an element in such a target. Therefore, Griffin committed a federal crime, and was rewarded with a U.S. Attorney appointment. An even greater outrage, though, is that--to this day--neither Congress nor the news media has dealt with the blatant stealing of votes in both Florida and Ohio.

Iraq Objector to Face up to Seven Years

| Tue Mar. 6, 2007 5:29 PM EST

With well-known Iraq objector Ehren Watada waiting to face his second court martial, objector Agustin Aguayo was found guilty of desertion earlier today. He fled on September 2 from a window of his on-base home in Germany while officers were there trying to force him to redeploy. Here's the Los Angeles Times:

Aguayo first applied for conscientious objector status in February 2004, just before his unit deployed to Iraq.

A combat medic with the 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, he served for one year at a base near Tikrit -- often refusing to load his weapon while on guard duty -- while his application was being considered.

The Army rejected his request, and after numerous appeal attempts failed...Aguayo faced a second deployment to Iraq last summer.

Aguayo may face up to 7 years in prison. The number of conscientious objector applications tripled when the Iraq war began, and has held steady since then.

Scooter Libby's Unpardonable Fundraiser

| Tue Mar. 6, 2007 2:21 PM EST

Scooter Libby's legal defense fund has yet to start calling for a presidential pardon. But while it rejiggers its strategy, let's get reacquainted with the group's head, Republican donor and former ambassador Mel Sembler. As John Gorenfeld wrote in our May 2006 issue:

...Sembler knows a thing or two about the humiliations of involuntary confinement. For 17 years, he directed Straight, Inc., a substance-abuse rehab and behavior modification program that treated American teens like terrorism suspects. Sembler's official bio boasts that the "remarkable program" — where children had to flap their arms like chickens or else face shaming as "sluts" and homosexuals — treated 12,000 kids. President George H.W. Bush hailed it as one of his "thousand points of light." But in the early '90s, amid state investigations and suits filed by clients claiming physical and mental abuse, his clinics were dismantled. Hundreds of Straight alums now claim they were scarred for life, among them Samantha Monroe, who was enrolled in 1980 at age 12 and claims she was starved, raped, and confined in a closet.

Once a point of light, always a point of light, I guess.

Up Next for Libby: How to Get Pardoned

| Tue Mar. 6, 2007 2:18 PM EST

 libby110.jpg The pressing question for Scooter Libby, now that he's been convicted on four of the five counts against him and faces 25 years in prison, is how to get off the hook. Who will pardon him and when? The answer to the first question is Bush, probably, but would W. really do it in the middle of the 2008 presidential campaign? That would surely sink the already rickety Republican ship.

Libby is to be sentenced in June and cynical professionals in Washington don't expect him to do any jail time. They know he'll get off one way or another. Key pardons of the past:


  • President Jerry Ford pardoned Richard Nixon for official misconduct on September 8,1974. Of course, that was after Nixon resigned. At the time polls showed Americans were against the pardon.
  • Jimmy Carter pardoned Vietnam war resisters.
  • George H.W. Bush pardoned 75 people. They included six top Reagan administration officials tied up in the Iran contra scandal. (Bush senior owed his very political existence to Reagan. Reagan trounced him in the Republicans primaries in '80, then magnanimously offered him the vice presidency, which the Connecticut blueblood grabbed.) Casper Weinberger, secretary of Defense, was convicted of lying to the independent counsel. He was pardoned by Bush Sr.
  • Clinton pardoned billionaire Marc Rich.
  • -- James Ridgeway

    Meet David Hicks and his Beleaguered Counsel

    | Tue Mar. 6, 2007 1:28 PM EST

     david_hicks65x70.jpg Few people in America know who David Hicks is. He's an Australian man who was captured in Afghanistan shortly after 9/11 and last week was the first person stored away at Guantanamo to be formally charged by the United States government under the new system of military tribunals. Hicks had been in Gitmo for five years (he claims he was subject to beatings), and was there under an allegation of attempted murder until the charges came down. At that point attempted murder was dropped because of lack of evidence (see Padilla, Jose) and Hicks was instead charged with material support of terrorism, which wasn't illegal until 2006.

    Well, now that Hicks's case is actually going to trial, the government is considering charging Hicks' lawyer with "using contemptuous language towards the president, vice-president, and secretary of defense." Apparently that's illegal for a military lawyer (free speech is notoriously lacking in the Armed Services). Never mind the obvious question of how the man is supposed to do his job without violating that law; penalties for that offense include jail time and loss of employment and Hicks' lawyer -- Major Michael Mori of Massachusetts, who has been criticized by the military for repeatedly traveling to Australia to speak out against Hicks' treatment and taking part in events like vigils on Hicks' behalf -- is saying that he may resign from the case because he can no longer speak out for Hicks' without endangering his own legal status. It's a total conflict of interest, one that the government may have created intentionally and in my mind amounts to an obstruction of due process.

    The newest reporting on Hicks is that if he is willing to accept a plea bargain and plead guilty to supporting terrorism, he might get off on time served and return to Australia a free man.

    To learn more, see the David Hicks wikipedia page, which has links to dozens of Australian newspaper articles about him.

    Advertise on MotherJones.com

    We're Sorry, But Not THAT Sorry

    | Tue Mar. 6, 2007 1:26 PM EST

    Suddenly, Sen. Sam Brownback wants to apologize to African Americans and Native Americans for generations of suffering. Such attempts have been made by Congress before, but the twist here is that Brownback, who is an extreme right-wing politician, is running for president in 2008.

    The resolution, authored by Brownback and Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen, "acknowledges that the U.S. government 'violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatic agreements with Indian tribes' while taking actions that caused 'immense harm' to native peoples, including forced removal, relocation and extermination."

    Brownback has a 20% rating (lower than Harry Reid's!) from the ACLU, which means that he has gone out of his way to deny civil liberties to citizens, many of whom, of course, are minorities. He voted to end special funding to minority-owned businesses and against setting aside highway funds for minorities.

    Brownback voted against maintaining the right of habeus corpus in death penalty appeals, has consistently voted against public education, and--despite his talk about Native Americans' stewardship of the land--has consistently voted against conserving the environment (he has a 0% rating from the League of Conservation Voters).

    And while it's nice that hypocrites in Congress are falling all over themselves to apologize to African Americans and Native Americans, when is Congress going to consider apologizing to women? We were burned as witches, denied birth control, denied the vote, forbidden to take most jobs, forbidden to enroll in many schools (until the 1970s), had genital mutilation performed on us (until the late 1970s), denied credit, given no protection against spousal abuse, denied the right to divorce, placed in psychiatric hospitals for asking questions or speaking our minds, sexually abused and assaulted in the workplace, denied the right to participate in most sports...the list goes on and on.

    The truth, of course, is that "apologies" like Brownback's are shallow and offensive, but at least Congress considers African Americans and Native Americans politically important enough to pander to.

    The Company We Keep

    | Tue Mar. 6, 2007 1:18 PM EST

    The BBC recently asked 28,000 people around the world to rate a dozen countries plus the EU in terms of whether they have a positive or negative influence on world affairs.

    The country that most people believe has a negative affect on the world? Israel. Followed by Iran. Third is the United States and fourth is North Korea. Five years after President Bush named Iran and North Korea to the "axis of evil", we find ourselves rated as dangerous as both by the world community. Awesome.

    Breaking: Libby Guilty on Four of Five Counts

    | Tue Mar. 6, 2007 1:10 PM EST

    CNN reports that the jury in the Scooter Libby trial has returned a guilty verdict on four of five counts. Libby faces a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and a fine of $1 million.

    Update: More from CNN.

    Libby was convincted of:


  • Obstruction of justice when he intentionally deceived a grand jury investigating the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame
  • Making a false statement by intentionally lying to FBI agents about a conversation with NBC newsman Tim Russert
  • Perjury when he lied in court about his conversation with Russert
  • A second count of perjury when he lied in court about conversations with other reporters
  • Jurors found Libby not guilty of a second count of making a false statement relating to a conversation he had with Matt Cooper of TIME. Libby's defense team plans to appeal.

    Mother Jones has covered the Libby trial from start to finish.

    "The Libby Trial: Courtroom Theatrics in the Closing Arguments," February 21, 2007

    "The Libby Trial: Tim Russert Takes the Stand," February 7, 2007

    "Leakers Who Lunch: Judith Miller Testifies How Scooter Libby Pushed Plame Story," January 30, 2007

    "Libby Defense Lawyer: Scooter Scapegoated, Culprit is Karl," January 23, 2007

    "Plame Case: Fitzgerald is Getting Nifonged," January 17, 2007

    El-Masri: "I Am Not a State Secret"

    | Mon Mar. 5, 2007 9:53 PM EST

    Don't miss Khaled el-Masri's op-ed in the Los Angeles Times. El-Masri was a victim of the CIA's extraordinary rendition program, and was held and tortured even after the CIA realized they had mistaken him for Al Qaeda operative Khalid al-Masri. The CIA can't keep el-Masri, an innocent, private German citizen, from talking about his ordeal. But it's fighting mightily to avoid apologizing to him. El-Masri sued the U.S. government, but the government claimed successfully that the entire case is a "state secret," even though it has been widely reported. For more about the absurd and frightening implications of the "state secret" privilege, click here.

    El-Masri's op-ed is called, simply, "I am not a state secret." I'm betting this is one guy the CIA wishes they'd never touched.