Political MoJo

States with Voting Problems

| Tue Nov. 7, 2006 1:50 PM EST

People for the American Way reports the election incident reporting system (EIRS) "is experiencing enormous traffic and is difficult to access. We are working to solve the problem." Some of the hotspots this morning:

Ohio: Confusion over photo ID requirements, delays because of voting machine problems.

Pennsylania: Long lines in Allegheny county where machines did not work this morning. Machine failures resulted in some leaving the polling place without having voted. Voting machine-related delays also in Philadelphia and Lebanon county.

Illinois: In Will County, an election judge failed to show up and a polling place was still closed an hour after polls were supposed to open.

Florida: Voting machine problems and the failure of an election judge to show up in Broward County cause delays. Also, "In Deerfield Beach, one predominantly African American precinct did not open for at least two hours when machines failed, and no paper ballots were available,'' says People.

Indiana: Electronic voting machines were causing problems in Delaware County and Marion County. In Delaware County, computer errors were causing problems in 75 precincts, and in Marion County, touch-screen machines were not working in more than 10 percent of the county's precincts, and voters were using paper ballots instead.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Virginia Voters Speak Their Minds

| Tue Nov. 7, 2006 12:05 PM EST

At the Westgate elementary school in Manassas, another northern Virginia Washington suburb, voters are put out because some have been re-routed through two precincts before landing in a third where their names are listed on the books. There were reports of heavy voting in the early morning hours here, but by mid morning there was but a trickle of voters going in and out of the school.

People were not shy in expressing their opinions on who they voted for and why.

Thomas Hamilton, 70, said, "I am better off today than I was four or eight years ago." He cast his ballot for Allen.

Roger Johnson, 58, a plumber, doesn't like the war and thinks the Dems "are a step in the right direction." Johnson adds, "Bring the babies home."

Linda Gerkin, 46, a receptionist, said the war was a major issue. "I support the troops and what we're doing but I'd like to get them out of there," she said, adding the Republicans -- "they'll get them out."

Luis Unana, 26, a student at George Mason University who works full time in a security firm, said he wanted to see traffic improvement and improved higher education. He was against the war, and voted straight Democrat.

Voting Outrage? Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE

| Tue Nov. 7, 2006 11:22 AM EST

As Americans head to the polls today, they should program one very important number into their cell phones: 1-866-OUR-VOTE. If you encounter any suspicious situations at the polls, log them at that number, and help citizen activists patrol the vote.

Several web sites are publicizing voting irregularities as they come up, including protectourvotes.org and talkingpointsmemo.com.

Finally, electiononline.org has a good rundown of voting news broken down by state.

Update: People keep mentioning more sites monitoring voting incidents and problems around the nation. Other good ones include electionprotection365.org and votetrustUSA.org.

Virginia Early Morning Voting

| Tue Nov. 7, 2006 11:02 AM EST

Polling was relatively light in early morning voting in the key swing northern Virginia suburbs in the Webb/Allen Senate race. At a community center in Dale City, down the Potomac from Washington, there was a small line by 8:30 with officials claiming 155 people having already voted. "I was a veteran," said Clyde Lawrence, who voted for Allen. "You've got to back the troops regardless of what's going on."

The actual voting process is taking somewhat longer than expected because there are three amendments on the ballot, including one on marriage

Heavy rain is predicted for parts of Virginia and Tennessee.

Storm Clouds in Kentucky 2nd

| Tue Nov. 7, 2006 10:22 AM EST

The race for Conress in Kentucky's second district is not only hotly competitive, but is already embroiled in voting rights irregularities. According to Warren Stewart of VotetrustUSA "callers are complaining that the name of the candidate that shows up on the review screen is not the candidate they voted for." In the end run the irregulaities may amount to nothing, but the contest is well worth keeping an eye on.

In the 2nd district Ron Lewis, the incumbent with 12 years in the House, looked like a shoo-in. But Democratic challenger Mike Weaver is hard on his tail and has pulled up enough for CQ last night to change the ratings from Favored Republican to Leans Republican. Weaver's success in the campaign can be attributed to his conservative stance on issues, which have helped keep him from getting tabbed as yet another left wing Democrat. He shies clear of Nancy Pelosi, plays up his background as a vet, but has been criticized as being too conservative. Lewis looked bad when he didn't show up for eight consecutive debates.

Election Chief Asked for ID at Voting Booth After Helping Secure Law Saying ID Not Necessary

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 10:00 PM EST

A zany and troubling story out of Missouri. First, a quick run-down on the issue of voter identification: Democrats in charge of elections usually oppose forcing individuals to show photo ID at the polls because the Democratic base is more likely than the Republican not to have a driver's license, state ID card, or anything similar. Republicans, for the same reason, favor mandatory voter ID.

Missouri's Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, a Democrat, thought she had this settled after a state Supreme Court ruling struck down a law that mandated voter ID. Then she went to the polls.

Carnahan was asked three times by a poll worker to show photo ID when she went to cast an absentee ballot Friday. From the AP: "Carnahan said that she tried to explain a photo ID was not necessary, but that the election worker replied that she was instructed to ask for one anyway. Carnahan said she eventually was allowed to vote without displaying a photo identification."

Said Carnahan: "I'm guessing this may be happening in other parts of the state." And other parts of the country, no doubt.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

The Newest New Election Tricks

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 8:50 PM EST

If you've read Mother Jones' recent story on 11 sneaky vote suppression tactics, you might think you know every trick in the bag. But just in case you aren't already feeling paranoid, more concerns have been brought to light in Cast Out, a new report by NYU's Brennan Center for Justice:

Wireless Technology in Voting Machines

A year-long Brennan Center study, completed in June, found many voting machines include wireless components that could be infiltrated by a Trojan horse virus using technology as simple as a palm pilot. Only Minnesota, New York and California ban machines with wireless components. The report found the machines "pose a real danger to the integrity of national, state and local elections."

The Help America Vote Act Inverted

Passed by Congress in 2002 to improve access to the polls, the Help America Vote Act requires all states to create computerized databases of registered voters by January 1, 2006. "For the first time we are seeing virtually every state with a centralized voter list," says Cast Out author Wendy Weiser. The databases are supposed to be more reliable and easily updated than paper versions, but, as they come online, many states are cross-checking them against databases maintained by other state agencies such as the Department of Motor Vehicles and purging any names that don't match up. According to Weiser, these cross-checks can improperly reject up to 20 percent of voters from the rolls. Voters may have no way of knowing they've been booted until the show up at the polls on election day.

And Don't Bother Registering Either

Some states are also using DMV and Social Security databases to reject voter registration applications as soon as they arrive. Challenged in a lawsuit, Washington State and Pennsylvania abandoned the practice but Florida, North Carolina, South Dakota and Iowa still use it.

Clinics Want To Know How Bill O'Reilly Got Confidential Patient Records

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 8:01 PM EST

Two clinics in Topeka, Kansas have asked the Kansas Supreme Court to investigate Kansas Attorney General Phil Kline and Fox Broadcasting's Bill O'Reilly over O'Reilly's claim that he possessed information from the records of patients who underwent abortion procedures.

Kline, a vocal opponent of abortion, took possession of ninety medical records from the two clinics earlier this year "as part of his investigation into alleged cases of child rape, failure to report child rape and violations of state's late-term abortion statue." According to Kline's website:

Those medical records are being reviewed by criminal prosecutors and investigators in my office. I want to remind Kansans that women and children are not and never will be under investigation - only abortion doctors, confirming doctors, and rapists are under investigation. Also, I have never sought the women's identities. I do not need their identities. Their privacy is protected by a protocol my office established with the district court judge to removing the identifying information of the women from the very beginning.

O'Reilly maintains that an "inside source" gave him the information from the Topeka records. He cited the case of a doctor who performed late-term abortions "because patients were depressed," and referred to the procedure as "executing babies."

Last week, Kansas's former attorney general, Bob Stephan, asked the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission to investigate Kline's fundraising activities.

Human-Cow Embryos?!

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 7:28 PM EST

We interrupt the pre-election political chatter for something that's just too twisted not to briefly blog about: Researchers in the United Kingdom have applied for permission to create embryos made by fusing human DNA with cows' eggs. The goal is to get around the shortage of all-human embryos that's holding up stem-cell research. Apparently embryos with a little less humanity and a little more bovinity are easier to generate. Don't they read "The Island of Dr. Moreau" in Britain anymore?

Saddam Verdict Not Yet Fully Written, Yesterday's Announcement Was Early Release

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 6:38 PM EST

In a blog post over at NBC News, reporter Richard Engel observes that details on why Saddam is being sentenced to death are still unclear. (The reasons are obvious, of course, and the verdict a foregone conclusion for years, but the court released little by way of supporting argumentation.) Turns out, the verdict hasn't been fully written and is expected to be completed Thursday. Money paragraph:

The full verdict, a document of several hundred pages, explaining how and why today's judgment was reached was not released. U.S. officials said it should be ready by Thursday. So why issue the verdict today? U.S. court advisors told reporters today it was delayed mainly for technical reasons. All insist the verdict was not politically timed and that it was an Iraqi decision; there is no reason to doubt their word.

Huh. The verdict will be completed two days after the American midterms, but the decision is made public two days before. I'll bet the Bush Administration didn't plan for that to come out.