Political MoJo

More Election Day Problems

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 2:14 PM EST

According to a press release from People for the American Way, there are several different sorts of voting problems that have already occurred:

Voter intimidation:
California, Maryland, Illinois, New York, Texas

Machines and technology snafus:
Maryland, California, Illinois, Tennessee

New voter ID laws:
Ohio, Arizona, Indiana

A run on absentee ballots:
Pennsylvania, California, Maryland

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Election Irregularities: Already Happening

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 1:56 PM EST

Warren Stewart, policy director for VoteTrustUSA, a nonprofit that tracks voting irregularities at the state and local level, is reporting that voting problems have already begun. In 15 states there are provisions for early voting, and that's where the problems are occurring.

So far 5 states are involved. Voter choices are being flipped to the opposite candidates on all 4 electronic voting machines -- Diebold TSx, Sequoia Edge, ES&S iVotronic, and Hart InterCivic eSlate.

"Three counties in Texas report vote-flipping on the Diebold and ES&S machines," Stewart writes. "Three counties in Florida report vote-flipping on the ES&S and Sequoia machines. One county in Illinois, on the Sequioa Edge, and one county in Arkansas, on the ES&S iVotronic. In some cases, when the voter selects one candidate, the machine shows an opponent is selected instead."

A South Florida voter reports: "When I touched the one [button] for the Democratic vote, that button disappeared and the vote went to the Republican."

And from Illinois: "Corrine Stoker pushed the button for one candidate, but her voting machine showed she voted for the opponent."

Unions Might Win Big in Nevada in '08

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 1:01 PM EST

In an effort to shake up their presidential nomination process, the Democratic National Committee has moved Nevada up to second in line in the 2008 primaries - right after the Iowa caucuses. Since Las Vegas is home to some of the few genuinely thriving unions in the nation, the move is likely to give another boost to the powerful culinary workers' union. "We can be a very good ally," says a local union leader. "And we can be a very bad foe. Working people are going to have a real place at the table."

Will Alt-Energy Initiative Boomerang?

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 12:50 PM EST

Tax oil corporations and use the money to fund alternative energy development? Sounds like a no-brainer. That's the gist of California's Proposition 87, and indeed, I'm for it and think all right-thinking people should be too. But today's LA Times does have a good counterpoint:

"(V)enture capitalists with investments in alternative energy firms are huge donors to the campaign... There is nothing to prevent such investors from sitting on the board that allocates the research money generated by the proposition, which is precisely the conflict-ofinterest problem that has tainted California's last experiment with taxpayer-funded research, 2004's stem cell initiative ."

The Times goes on to say, less convincingly, that there's already plenty of money going into alt-energy development and that oil companies are overtaxed in California as it is.

Army Recruiters: "War Ended a Long Time Ago"

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 12:10 PM EST

There are 138,000 American soldiers in Iraq, and no signs of a drawdown in sight. But don't tell that to the bunch of Army recruiters caught on tape by ABC lying to potential recruits about whether they might end up in the sandbox.

"Nobody is going over to Iraq anymore?" one student asks a recruiter.

"No, we're bringing people back," he replies.

"We're not at war. War ended a long time ago," another recruiter says.

And if the recruits don't like Army life? One recruiter falsely claimed they could easily get "a 'Failure to Adapt' discharge.... It's an entry-level discharge so it won't affect anything on your record. It'll just be like it never happened."

Church and State

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 10:45 AM EST

A Christian Broadcasting Network blog has been asking readers "Which issues will affect your vote during the midterm elections?''

Excerpts from the discussion last week:

"Forget the politics. I am in no mood today. Let's just remember we all worship the same God, who is most merciful and benevolent, and must be heartbroken to see this quarreling. A situation too complicated to explain that has been most stressful for me has just been resolved by what can only be divine intervention. At the moment, I don't care who wins Congress, or if Baptists ever let gays marry, I'm just overjoyed I'm not losing the person I love most. Thank you, Jesus." —orpheus1984

"What difference does it make regarding political issues. Once a man or woman is elected into office, their whole character changes and all of a sudden they take ownership of the state they represent, or their country, and forget to represent the people. 'The People' is the last of their concern as long as they get their personal 'agenda'. As far as truth in government is concerned, it does not exist. Immorality, killing the unborn, homosexuality, lieing [sic], murder, theft are all reflective of the minds that govern this country" —darmar48

"I am just amazed at what a crazy frightening disease religion really is. Please keep it away from children and animals." —liberate

"…I believe our country has real problems to deal with, and none of them are the so called 'values' issues conservatives use to rally the faithful. How much time and money did the last Congress spend on such peripheral issues such as gay marriage, flag burning and Terri Schiavo while ignoring Social Security, the health care crisis in our country and gun control. No matter which side of these issues you fall on, you have to admit all these things have a far greater impact on our country than whether two people who love each other." —deacnblews

Read the discussion postings to date here.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

Katherine Harris Recruits Jews to Join the Republican Revival

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 1:20 AM EST

Katherine Harris, who's already a serious underdog in her bid to unseat Florida's Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson is now having to defend comments she made last month on Jewish conversion. In a conference call prayer breakfast, Awaken the Nation on October 3, Harris talked about Florida leading the country in a religious reawakening, including prayer in schools, changes in tax regulations on churches and charities, and she even predicted a revival:

"We just decree and declare there will be a shift for this nation, that there will be an enormous revival, even a revolution as we speak. Once again, we'll rejoice, rejoice with your Son and bring this nation into alignment with your government with your kingdom principles and authority."

She went on:

"And Father God, right now on the day after the Jewish new year, Father, after the day after atonement, as they enter into their new year, Father God, I just pray that you would bring the hearts and minds of our Jewish brothers and sisters into alignment."

Jewish groups are troubled by her comments, and in response a Harris spokeswoman said Friday that she was talking about converting Jews to vote Republican, not to Christianity. Yeah, because it says in the Torah that you have to be a Democrat so that must be what she was referring to. And how about Muslims, they have party affiliations too, how about bringing them into alignment?

Harris, who is trailing Nelson by a good 20 points, has made no secret of her politics-as-religion throughout the campaign. In August, she told the Florida Baptist Witness, "If you're not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin." And she ended the October call with this prayer:

"And Father, awaken our churches now. Treat the pastors' hearts so that those who think there's no place for government, have them understand kingdom government, and how they need to be involved in the governance on this earth because God is our governance."

It's likely not even God can help her overcome on Tuesday.

American Conservative mag: Dump Bush!

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 1:13 AM EST

It's become that obvious. This quote isn't from the Nation or Counterpunch, but from American Conservative magazine:

"(Bush) rushed America into a war against Iraq, a war we are now losing and cannot win, one that has done far more to strengthen Islamist terrorists than anything they could possibly have done for themselves. ... The war will continue as long as Bush is in office, for no other reason than the feckless president can't face the embarrassment of admitting defeat. The chain of events is not complete: Bush, having learned little from his mistakes, may yet seek to embroil America in new wars against Iran and Syria."

Of course, they also despise him for being soft on illegal immigrants. I'll take it, as long as we all agree that the solution is to dump the GOP.

Cheney Going Hunting On Election Day

| Mon Nov. 6, 2006 12:54 AM EST

And not in some metaphoric way. With a gun. First time since he shot his pal in the face that time. You don't want to be within range when the returns start coming in.

Is Saddam Verdict Another "Mission Accomplished" Moment?

| Sun Nov. 5, 2006 11:26 PM EST

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote skeptically about predictions that Saddam's imminent sentencing would give the GOP a last-minute election bump. Sure, the verdict gives Bush and Republican candidates something to crow about for a couple of days, but the announcement is so unsurprising as to be anti-climactic. Its timing is still subject to speculation. But perhaps the more important question is what the verdict means for Iraq. Does it, as Iraqi blogger Riverbend fears, mark the beginning of Bush's own personal disengagement with the war, another "Mission Accomplished" moment he can use to claim success and move on?

I'm more than a little worried. This is Bush's final card. The elections came and went and a group of extremists and thieves were put into power (no, no—I meant in Baghdad, not Washington). The constitution which seems to have drowned in the river of Iraqi blood since its elections has been forgotten. It is only dug up when one of the Puppets wants to break apart the country. Reconstruction is an aspiration from another lifetime: I swear we no longer want buildings and bridges, security and an undivided Iraq are more than enough. Things must be deteriorating beyond imagination if Bush needs to use the 'Execute the Dictator' card.

Sentencing Saddam to hang may make for a nice line to add to stump speeches, but it won't change things on the ground. It won't end the insurgency or the civil war or turn the lights back on. It won't bring the troops home or chart a course for victory. Even if the timing was a Rovian plot, it just goes to further demonstrate how out of touch the administration is from the reality of Iraq—and its own electorate. Which is why, come Wednesday, this hopefully will be remembered as the November surprise that wasn't.