MotherJones.com | MoJo Blog - Social Issues and Political Commentary: Civil War in Iraq?

« Should Corporations Handle the Ports? | Blog Index | Sudanese Conflict Spills Into Chad »


Advertisement
recent entries The ACORN Controversy: A Tough Nut to Crack ACORN's Wild Success Quantified Anchorage Daily News Calls Palin a Big "Orwellian" Liar Fighting Extradition, "Merchant of Death" Cites Guantanamo Oversight of Hedge Funds/Top Dem Donors Postponed Until After Election McCain Campaign: We Meant We'd Unveil New Economic Plans Tuesday McCain Passes on Opportunity to Introduce New Solutions on Economy; Obama Makes Him Pay Freedom vs. Big Government: Palin Can't Do the Math McCain's John Lewis Flip-Flop

Civil War in Iraq?

Swopa rounds up evidence—okay, more like the barest of hints—that the bombing of the Shiite shrine in Samarra yesterday may have been the work of militant Shiites looking to provoke some serious sectarian warfare. It's not impossible, I guess. And it certainly appears to be working, with Shiites and Sunnis battling it out all across the country. Quite obviously a lot of different groups in Iraq have a lot of different motives for edging the country closer to civil war, and it seems like that will only become increasingly easier to do as time goes on.

Meanwhile, it was only a few days ago that Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad threatened to withdraw aid from the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government if it insisted on engaging in sectarian warfare with the Sunnis. And now top Shiite leaders are blaming Khalilzad for encouraging the insurgents with that statement all while… engaging in sectarian warfare. So what will the U.S. do? President Bush sounds like he's planning to back the Shiite government and oppose the "terrorists" while calling for "restraint" on all sides. But this doesn't seem like the sort of thing you can really finesse in this way. Juan Cole says this is an "apocalyptic day." Very bad.

Posted by Bradford Plumer on 02/22/06 at 2:30 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg this | de.licio.us

Comments

I feel a sense of doom whenever the word Iraq, Shiite, etc, etc is brought into conversation. It seems that if isn't one thing, it is something else. I will say that while I can the US being vested in "liberating Iraq", I cannot see us choosing sides in something and coming out ahead. To be clearer, I feel that the Bush making statements on which side we back, is not exactly the way to "show restraint".

Posted by: erin on 02/22/06 at 4:05 PM

oops, typo. It shouldn't read "the Bush", it should read "Bush".

Posted by: erin on 02/22/06 at 4:06 PM

The "Iraq Adventure", in all likelihood, will end up as the champion on turn-around time for "blowback".

It may also end up being the most severe.

Posted by: AmeriPundit on 02/22/06 at 8:34 PM