MoJo Blog

« Building roads on federal land: "We're open for business." | Blog Index | TABOR Doesn't Work »

Advertisement

Line-Item Veto: Worse Than We Thought

Because no budget maneuver is too arcane or seemingly trivial for us to analyze, let's discuss the line-item veto again. Previously, we've argued that giving the president the power to strip out any part of a congressional spending bill he or she didn't like would invite abuse by the executive branch.

Now the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has their own report on the line-item veto, noting that the line-item veto powers sought by this administration would enable the president to withhold funding for all sorts of programs beyond earmarks—"pork," in other words. If Bush wanted to, he could withhold funds for months and months from, say, the Education Department, even if Congress doesn't approve. In his 2006 budget, Bush called for, among other things, a $3.4 billion cut to education, an $866 million cut to the Department of Health and Human Services, and a $277 million cut from the Environmental Protection Agency. Congress will likely (and sensibly) reject all of these cuts—unless, of course, the president can skirt around Congress.

You'd think this sort of thing would never pass muster with the Supreme Court since it violates the separation of powers in a major way. Still, the idea needs to be stopped. Letting the president basically write legislation on his own would be catastrophic, to put it very mildly.

Posted by Bradford Plumer on 03/23/06 at 1:18 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg this | de.licio.us



Comments

It was my understanding that in order to conform with the SCOTUS’s decision last decade regarding the legality and constitutionality of the “line item veto”, the new proposed “line item veto” law would require any bill to go back to congress for approval after the administration cuts out segments for a strait up or down re authorization.

Posted by: TDC on 03/24/06 at 9:00 AM

"Letting the president basically write legislation on his own would be catastrophic, to put it very mildly."

I'd amend that sentence slightly to read "Letting THIS president basically write legislation on his own would be catastrophic, to put it very mildly." Obviously a line-item veto is a dangerous tool in the hands of any president, but in the hands of George Bush it could spell the end of life as we know it. Or at least make it happen sooner than Bush is aiming for.

Posted by: JDC on 03/24/06 at 12:57 PM

Amazing! I could swear I heard good 'ol Bush telling all of us that he was all for education, and he was steering students towards math and science. Hmmm. Too bad they don't talk about these cuts on TV. Just like that "no child left behind". Yup - he cut millions from that program too. And, of course, the funds to feed poor children meals at school - that disappeared too. Probably ended up in Halliburton's hands.

Posted by: Lucy Davis on 03/24/06 at 2:54 PM

So, Kerry signed on his support to the LIV with Bush. And I thought Bush was the Moron! And Kerry must believe that Bush won't club the Dems with LIV? How about this bridge Bush wants to sell Kerry?

Posted by: Bill Powell on 03/24/06 at 6:58 PM

LIV,ILLEGAL WIRETAPS,ILLEGAL WAR,ADDENDUM ADDED TO PATRIOT ACT SO BUSH CAN OVER RIDE RULES,TORTURE CAN STILL BE APPLIED IF BUSH WANTS AND Mc CAIN DID NOTHING ABOUT IT!!PAT ROBERTS IS A DISGRACE TO ALL AMERICANS BECAUSE HE WON'T LET ANY OVER SIGHT BE IN FORCE. GREED AND CORRUPTION ARE THE ONLY THINGS THAT THIS ADMINISTATION STANDS FOR!!!!!!!!!
POWER BREEDS CORRUPTION!

Posted by: Zola Daniels on 03/25/06 at 11:27 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Houston Mounted Police Run Over Protesters (5)
Ranselar VanDerpoel wrote: Deacon, you have stated the problem perfectly! It is a SOC... [more]

"This Just In..." A Fair and Balanced Daily Show (2)
Usama wrote: FOX and the Ritewing already have a major corner of the me... [more]

Be Thankful for Complainers (2)
Schuller wrote: Hah, bit tangential, but: the Finns are coffee-crazy, and ... [more]

Rangel Says Bring It On, The Draft That Is (9)
Ranselar VanDerpoel wrote: Well folks, back when we had the draft, the rich kids stil... [more]

Obama to Reporter: I'm Sorry for "Messing Up Your Game" (11)
Rob Dagostino wrote: 8 years of bush please run barack run you get everybodys v... [more]

NYPD Watches From Above (1)
Mark P. wrote: Fascism is a people problem, not a problem that comes from... [more]

Attention Gay Wal-Mart Shoppers... (8)
Ben wrote: My wife works for Walmart. Today Nov 22 there was a meetin... [more]

Teen Birth Rate at a Record Low (1)
Michael L. Wagner wrote: According to a Texas A&M University study, students in alm... [more]

Al Jazeera's First Week Gets Positive Reviews (2)
Larry wrote: Is it possible that there really is democracy in America? ... [more]

New Poll: Vast Majority of Iraqis Want U.S. to Go Home (1)
Matteo Tomasini at EPIC wrote: Just a heads up, this poll is not new; It came out at the ... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















McCain's Angle

Yet More Palin

News Flash

More Sarah


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2005 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS