MoJo Blog

« Newly released documents show U.S. role in bloody Argentine coup | Blog Index | Immigration and Polls »

Advertisement

U.S.-Shiite Tensions in Iraq

A year ago, military analyst John Robb predicted that the U.S. in Iraq would begin arming and backing "loyalist paramilitaries" to fight the Sunni insurgency, and that that the tactic could backfire badly. As it turned out, they did and it has, now that Shiite militias linked to the Interior Ministry are massacring Sunnis by the dozen each day, and, as military sources told the New York Times yesterday, pose a greater security problem than al-Qaeda and the rest of the Sunni insurgency do.

Now anyone who remembered what happened in El Salvador in the 1980s—when U.S.-condoned "death squads" prolonged, rather than ended, the conflict—could have told everyone that this would happen. In fact, some people tried. But no one listened. And now that the U.S. military has evidently begun carrying out raids against Shiite mosques—and seriously pissing off the Iraqi government—the real problems are just beginning. Robb has a post today noting just how bad things could, conceivably, get:

Here's a likely scenario for how this will play out: deeper entrenchment within US bases (to limit casualties) and pledges of neutrality (Rumsfeld) will prove hollow. Ongoing ethnic slaughter will force US intervention to curtail the militias. Inevitably, this will increase tensions with the militias and quickly spin out of control. Military and police units sent to confront the militias will melt down (again), due to conflicting loyalties.

Several large battles with militias will drive up US casualties sharply. Supply lines to US bases from Kuwait will be cut. Protesters will march on US bases to demand a withdrawal. Oil production via the south will be cut (again), bringing Iraqi oil exports to a halt. Meanwhile, the government will continue its ineffectual debate within the green zone, as irrelevant to the reality on the ground in the country as ever. Unable to function in the mounting chaos and facing a collapse in public support for the war, the US military will be forced to withdraw in haste.

It will be ugly.

To say the least.

Posted by Bradford Plumer on 03/28/06 at 11:25 AM | E-mail | Print



TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://161.58.185.225/mb/mb-backtracks.cgi/560

Comments

Surely, mistakes will happen, and, of course, it's difficult to know whether something was a mistake or actually planned...

For instance, leading up to "Iraq", we armed the Taliban (against the Russians), we armed Iran (F-16s, ect. to the Shaw), and we armed Iraq...

I have a friend who used to talk about how Air America (the Vietnam-era CIA airline) ran drugs; I thought this was BS. But then I found out that a former 60 Minutes reporter wrote a book that dealt with the subject... And it isn't so much that A.A. ran drugs as that A.A was started up precisely in order to run drugs...

So now I'm real suspicious and I question the "bumper" opium crop coming out of Afghanistan (did a too honest Pat Tillman get in the way...???).

And remember George W. is quite the magician!!!

So, now we are led to understand that by arming "loyalist paramilitaries" our great Government has created a greater security problem than al-Qaeda and the rest of the Sunni insurgency represent. What is one to think...???

Well, I think the answer is staring us in the face (and, no, it ain't nothing nice!!!).

George W. is a big ol' warmonger!!!!!

It really is a very far cry from funny, how contracts to the Pentagon's top ten contractors jumped 75% in 2001. And, by 2003. Halliburton's contracts leaped right out of sight (actually merely 9 times their 2001 levels), ect., ect...

While civilian contractors are handling 30% of the military support services in Iraq.

Here we should remember the $5 billion that went to private security concerns following the embassy bombings...

Yes, it was Pres. Eisenhower who warned us, so long ago, of such incestuous relationships...

Posted by: Michael L. Wagner on 03/28/06 at 1:04 PM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Texas to DC: Don't Fence Me In (2)
Clarence Smart wrote: Thank you, Eleanor! My thoughts exactly! ... [more]

Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Sex Toys (1)
Clarence Smart wrote: Do they grow cucumbers in Texas? ... [more]

Woodward, Kissinger, Vietnam--Let's Do The Time Warp Again (2)
john wrote: 1938 was over 50 years ago. Like the “world’s greatest g... [more]

Foley Now In Deeper Trouble (3)
john wrote: Kathleen, you are forgetting that 50% of the population ar... [more]

And the Next Secretary General Is... (2)
airtravel wrote: airtravel... [more]

Predatory Payday Lenders Ground Thousands of Troops (2)
car loan wrote: car loan... [more]

Turn Up the Propaganda, Please (1)
Joe DeLibertas wrote: Here WE Go Again: We're not fooling anyone particularly s... [more]

They've known about Foley for almost a YEAR? (3)
M Baley wrote: It looks like the Congress will now have to get together ... [more]

Foley Resigns Over Sexually Explicit Emails (Or, "...sick sick sick sick sick.") (4)
seattledem wrote: Typical Republican ... [more]

Remember the Anthrax Investigation? (9)
Dr.Q wrote: by having antrax identified of an specific strain tells me... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















Torches and Pitchforks

Quote of the Day

A Prayer For Palin

McCain on McCain


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2005 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS