« "E-Waste" Polluting Poor Communities | Blog Index | IRS to Sell Tax Information »


Advertisement
recent entries Why Every Liberal in Your Office Is Depressed Today Biden Addresses (and Readdresses) Partition in Iraq Sarah Palin's Secret Emails Palin's First Year as Mayor: Off With Their Heads! See Ya Later, Joe Palin Is the Right's Obama McCain's Domestic Policies: As Old As He Is McCain's Big Speech: More Prison Cell Than Policy Best Throw Away Line of the Day

California Considers Minimum Wage Hike

In the Los Angeles Times today, Tom McClintock, a Republican state Senator, says that California shouldn't raise the minimum wage. It will destroy jobs! People will be unemployed! Misery and poverty to follow! Anyone who thinks otherwise has fallen victim to the "smarmy rhetoric of leftist populism," you see:

The truth is that if your labor is worth $6.75 an hour and the minimum wage is raised to $7.75, you simply become unemployable. The first rung of the ladder is gone, and there's no place to start.

That sounds very clever, but here's some more "smarmy rhetoric" to consider. Very rarely, if ever, have modest minimum wage hikes had any sort of effect on employment in the real world. The Economic Policy Institute has written up the state level data for all to see. Employment in Florida actually rose after a dollar hike in the minimum wage last year. Call it magic. Congress boosted the federal minimum in 1990-91 and 1995-96 and no one can recall hordes of "unemployable" people wandering the street with their life possessions in shopping carts (the 1995 hike, in fact, preceded one of the tightest labor markets in recent memory). Britain and Australia have had similar experiences. Maybe if we squint really hard the real truth will become apparent, but that's the basic story.

No matter. McClintock's leaps on yet another canard—that the minimum wage only helps middle-class teenagers working cushy jobs at the mall:

One newspaper gushed that the proposed state increase will boost the pay of California's "working poor" by $2 billion. But the vast majority of minimum-wage earners are part of middle-class families. Most are teenagers chasing their first job or spouses of breadwinners trying to find a niche for themselves in the job market.

I'm not sure what the precise statistics are for California, but this sounds dubious. Heather Boushey of CEPR has estimated that, nation-wide, the average minimum-wage worker earns 68 percent of his or her family's income—precisely the sort of person who badly needs help. And that gushing newspaper likely has things right: After the 1995-96 federal increase, 35 percent of the gains went to the poorest 20 percent of the population. Very few policies are half as progressive, and if a few middle-class teenagers get richer as a result, well, what of it? (And given how fast California's tuition fees are rising, most of those teenagers probably need those extra dollars to pay for college.)

Posted by Bradford Plumer on 04/11/06 at 10:34 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg this | de.licio.us

Comments

Maybe, if you think really hard, you'd conclude that the "real" minimum wage is already higher than govt. mandated minimum wage. Or is the labor market the only market in the history of human civilization that requires gov't price fixing in order to operate effiently?

Posted by: Jay Hawkins on 04/12/06 at 11:29 AM

Without poverty capitalism would dry up and blow away. Using the poor to increase the profits for the rich is as old as government.When if ever will the poor learn to which wagon they should hitch there deadass horse.

Posted by: mgarrett on 04/13/06 at 6:04 AM

Yeah, ain't it awful, raising the minimum wage, just so more fast food emporiums can grow along the freeways. If the minimum wage had not been raised,we wouldn't be cursed with so many such establishments.

Posted by: ken loveless on 04/14/06 at 1:57 PM

Considering that rent and energy prices have about doubled in the last 6 yrs, I don't think that's asking too much.

Posted by: Phillip Hansen on 04/14/06 at 5:44 PM

So what makes so many of those earning minimum wage vote Republican? Are they that gullible?

Posted by: Electric Lady on 04/14/06 at 8:17 PM

Interesting that the minimum wage in Australia is over $10/hour isn't it? What makes the US so pathetic that we couldn't be bothered with making an attempt at creating a "living wage" rather than a minimum wage??? I wonder that myself. Really - where in CA can you live on $7.75 an hour? I remember an article that ran in SanFran in 2000 stating that in order to afford a one bedroom apartment in the city limits, you'd need to earn $22/hour. I think our priorities are completely out of wack when we even bother to consider raising a minimum wage to a mere $7.75...not to mention all the areas of the country where the minimum wage hasn't even reached $6.75 - we are a sad, sad people.

recent entries

California Considers Minimum Wage Hike

Comments

ARCHIVE

RECENT COMMENTS

THE CURRENT ISSUE

SEARCH MOTHER JONES

PHOTO ESSAYS

TODAY ON...

SPECIAL REPORTS

INTERVIEWS

LETTERS

BLOG LINKS

IN PRINT

DONATE TODAY