« Explaining Inaction on Global Warming | Blog Index | A Competent Bush Nominee? »


Advertisement
recent entries Condi Busted on Her Own Personal State of Denial Which Is Worse: The U.S. Torturing British Residents or Britain Not Taking Them Back? Salacious Exchanges With Underage Male Pages Foley Now In Deeper Trouble Environmental Damage: Another Reason Why a Border Fence is a Bad Idea Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Sex Toys Texas to DC: Don't Fence Me In Update--PERA Has Passed In the House of Representatives Woodward, Kissinger, Vietnam--Let's Do The Time Warp Again They've known about Foley for almost a YEAR?

Court of Appeals upholds unconstitutionality of Patriot Act's National Security Letter provision

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday on two challenges to the National Security Letter provision of the USA Patriot Act filed by the American Civil Liberties Uniion. Two different lower courts found the provision to be unconstitutional, and the ACLU argued that recent amendments to the law have made it even less democratic.

Using the NSL provision of the USA Patriot Act, the FBI can demand a range of personal records--email messages, visited websites, library records--without seeking court approval. In addition, the law puts an automatic gag on anyone whose records are gathered by the FBI.

One of the cases brought to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is from New York, and concerns an anonymous Internet Service Provider who challenged the NSL provision after the FBI demanded records. The other case was from Connecticut, where librarians challenged the provision for not permitting them to disclose their identities.

In 2004, Judge Victor Marrero struck down the NSL statute, and the Court of Appeals upheld his decision. Wrote Judge Richard Cardamone:

A ban on speech and a shroud of secrecy in perpetuity are antithetical to democratic concepts and do not fit comfortably with the fundamental rights guaranteed American citizens.... Unending secrecy of actions taken by government officials may also serve as a cover for possible official misconduct and/or incompetence.

Judge Cardamone added that national security concerns “should be leavened with common sense so as not forever to trump the rights of the citizenry under the Constitution.”

The court also lifted the gag that was put on the Connecticut librarians.

Posted by Diane E. Dees on 05/26/06 at 4:48 PM | E-mail | Print

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://161.58.185.225/mb/mb-backtracks.cgi/734

Comments

Thanks for the heads up on that.

Posted by: The Heretik on 05/26/06 at 7:55 PM

One for our side!

Posted by: simplot on 05/27/06 at 4:55 AM

“should be leavened with common sense so as not forever to trump the rights of the citizenry under the Constitution.”

How apropos, especially the “common sense” part… an unintentional tribute to Paine.
After all, his genius allowed us the constitution some hold so tightly.

P.S. Thank you Judge Cardamone.

Posted by: Ben Merc on 05/27/06 at 7:17 AM

That means we'll soon be hearing from Connecticut librarians. It should be interesting. Most of laws concerning the "Patriot Act" curtail our rights and liberties. I prefer rights over security.

Posted by: lickspittle on 05/28/06 at 5:32 PM

See how they now squeal(members of congress). Their constitutional rights violated........FBI raided a congressman's office and found $90,000 cash in a freezer. Seems Congress was not at all concerned about OUR constitutional rights when they passed that awful Patriot Act. What goes around comes around.

Posted by: Concerned on 05/31/06 at 3:42 AM