Well, it's not Chavez with his unprecedented heating oil offer that's the big security threat, try looking at BP's Northstar project for real threat potential.
At a cost of $500 million, BP Amoco is opening a new oilfield six miles off the north coast of Alaska, in a region of the world most affected by climate change.
In the last 20 years, pack ice three times the area of the UK has melted, yet, to get it's oil to shore across the pack-ice, BP is burying a pipeline for hot oil six feet below the Artic sea floor, a technique that's never been used before...
Furthermore, environmentalists say that extreme conditions and immensely powerful and shifting ice-pack equate to a one-in-four chance of an oil spill.
BP says that there need not be an unacceptable risk just because a practice is unprecedented...

Restore LIHEAP? But that would benefit residents of us commie-pinko-gaymarrying-non-Bush-voting atheist heathens up here in the Northeast and Upper Midwest.

Therefore...not bloody likely.

"BP says that there need not be an unacceptable risk just because a practice is unprecedented..."

How to interpret above statement:
Since Exon has skated on a large portion of the cost associated with their big Alaskan spill, BP figures risk or no risk, we will only be held partially responsible...go for it.