« Homelessness a threat to veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan | Blog Index | Can Malaria Be Stopped? »

Advertisement

recent entries Hamdan Taken Out of Bush's Hands Circumstantial Evidence Against Ivins Called "Compelling"; Widow Presses Lawsuit Easiest Comeback Ever A Senator Presses the NRA for Information on the Gun Lobby Mole "I Got Your Pledge of Allegiance RIGHT HERE" Okay, This Illustrates the Silliness of Polls Illustrating the Silliness of Polls Musharraf to Face Impeachment Proceedings A Brief History of Claims the White House Has Called "Absurd"

An Inconvenient Truth: Inconvenient...and true

In another small victory for reality over fantasy, the AP called 100 climate scientists and asked how they rated the science in Al Gore's global warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth. The 19 who'd seen the film, which is in limited release, gave the doc a pretty unequivocal thumbs-up.

... Gore conveyed the science correctly; the world is getting hotter and it is a manmade catastrophe-in-the-making caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

"Excellent," said William Schlesinger, dean of the Nicholas School of Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University. "He got all the important material and got it right." ...

The tiny errors scientists found weren't a big deal, "far, far fewer and less significant than the shortcoming in speeches by the typical politician explaining an issue," said Michael MacCracken, who used to be in charge of the nation's global warming effects program and is now chief scientist at the Climate Institute in Washington. ...

And yet, and yet...

While more than 1 million people have seen the movie since it opened in May, that does not include Washington's top science decision makers. President Bush said he won't see it. The heads of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA haven't seen it, and the president's science adviser said the movie is on his to-see list. [Italics mine.]

"They are quite literally afraid to know the truth," Gore said. "Because if you accept the truth of what the scientific community is saying, it gives you a moral imperative to start to rein in the 70 million tons of global warming pollution that human civilization is putting into the atmosphere every day."

UPDATE: (Via ThinkProgress) Even Frank Luntz (he of the famed there-is-no-consensus-on-global-warming memo), has come around.

UPDATE II: (Via Grist) The natural order reasserts itself as Sen. James Inhofe raises "serious [sic!] questions about AP's bias and methodology."

Posted by Julian Brookes on 06/28/06 at 11:27 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg this | de.licio.us