« Is Prostitution Really Inevitable? | Blog Index | Prison Guards Lock Down Schwarzenegger »
You can't leak something that's already overflowing
If anyone tells you that certain leftist newspapers like the Wall Street Journal (though they will probably say the New York Times, which is about as "leftist" as the WSJ) committed treason by leaking intelligence about the U.S.'s secret searches within a vast global database of confidential financial transactions--tell them to go to a "burning hot" place.
Really. Because that is where The Heretik is camped out, exposing the outrageousness of this claim. He explains that the Bush administration has been doing nothing but blabbing for years about its intention to spy on and monitor financial transactions as a way of fighting the so-called war on terror.
"George Bush should look in the mirror," The Heretik says, for "Nobody has done more to...tell terrorists we are on to them, on the financial trail which in some ways is going cold."
He then provides a chronological collection of statements by Bush, beginning September 24, 2001, in which he explains to the world over and over how the U.S. is tracking international financial transactions and freezing the assets of terrorists.
Except, of course, that didn't really happen. The Heretik points out that terrorists do not actually do business with Swift--what a surprise-- only with a few selected Swift banks, and that terrorist assets are easily and quickly converted to things like diamonds, gold and investments in front companies. However, as a result of the fishing expedition, millions of confidential Swift records have been released without authorization, violating privacy laws, and resulting in complaints lodged in thirty-two countries.
"The simple truth is terrorists need little money to do great harm." So says The Heretik. And he refers to Bryan Bender's Boston Globe story, in which Bender quotes former terror financing expert Victor D. Comras:
Unless they were pretty dumb, they had to assume their transactions were being monitored. We have spent the last four years bragging how effective we have been in tracking terrorist financing.
Posted by Diane E. Dees on 06/30/06 at 1:15 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg this | de.licio.us
Comments
The simple truth is that (I think) the President and the Republican party seem to think that they are the only ones who have the necessary knowledge to run the country. It seems as if they think that the ordinary American citizen is stupid; it seems as if alot of them are. For what else could you say about somebody who constantly upholds a leader who in the name of national security, is constantly whittling away at their constitutional rights.
Posted by: Clarence D. Smart on 07/03/06 at 4:48 PM
The sublime in the Bush administration is their minimalism—a distinctly American Internationalism. There is the world and then there are American interests. Our interests alone are that which marks out the sublime. Only a liberal could believe other nations exist when it comes to diplomacy. That would mean a compromise and for America compromise means weakness when we must seek nothing less than sublimity. —A Distinctly American Internationalism!
We could contrast this concept with the principle of democracy in general and ask ourselves whether a distinctly American Internationalism can even pretend to call itself democratic? Outside the Red Republican Curtain it is called autocratic imperialism or even fascism pure and simple! More enlightening is to attempt to gain insight into the base of our leadership’s moral ground or even the lack of it. In doing this then we can glimpse that for which they stand, which is that for which we all must stand by default. For that for which they stand is that which all Americans stand and even beyond—for the entire world as we know it. This follows directly from what a distinctly American Internationalism means—either you are with them, in which case you are American or you can disagree with them, in which case you are un-American. By deduction all those who are un-American are threats and subject to the schizophrenic rules regarding the War on Terrorism. The law of America today is “Either you are with us or you are against us”. There is no in-between. With such an understanding of democracy who needs fascism!
I’m happy that at least the New York Times attempted to uphold an American tradition of standing for at least one thing I was raised to believe that this nation stands—a Free Press and the concept of free speech in general. The public has a right to know what its government is doing. It is that simple. Moral Indifference is what the Bush administration asks of the American People and yet it is through moral indifference that the moral bridge breaks down and in its place stands a void known as nihilism. When one awakens to such a horror one finds that we stand for nothing at all or worse!
Posted by: jeff on 07/03/06 at 5:19 PM
ARCHIVE
November 19, 2006 - November 25, 2006
November 12, 2006 - November 18, 2006
November 5, 2006 - November 11, 2006
October 29, 2006 - November 4, 2006
October 22, 2006 - October 28, 2006
October 15, 2006 - October 21, 2006
October 8, 2006 - October 14, 2006
October 1, 2006 - October 7, 2006
September 24, 2006 - September 30, 2006
September 17, 2006 - September 23, 2006
September 10, 2006 - September 16, 2006
September 3, 2006 - September 9, 2006
August 27, 2006 - September 2, 2006
August 20, 2006 - August 26, 2006
August 13, 2006 - August 19, 2006
August 6, 2006 - August 12, 2006
July 30, 2006 - August 5, 2006
April 23, 2006 - April 29, 2006
April 16, 2006 - April 22, 2006
April 9, 2006 - April 15, 2006
March 26, 2006 - April 1, 2006
RECENT COMMENTS
Houston Mounted Police Run Over Protesters (5)
Ranselar VanDerpoel wrote:
Deacon, you have stated the problem perfectly! It is a SOC...
[more]
"This Just In..." A Fair and Balanced Daily Show (2)
Usama wrote:
FOX and the Ritewing already have a major corner of the me...
[more]
Be Thankful for Complainers (2)
Schuller wrote:
Hah, bit tangential, but: the Finns are coffee-crazy, and ...
[more]
Rangel Says Bring It On, The Draft That Is (9)
Ranselar VanDerpoel wrote:
Well folks, back when we had the draft, the rich kids stil...
[more]
Obama to Reporter: I'm Sorry for "Messing Up Your Game" (11)
Rob Dagostino wrote:
8 years of bush please run barack run you get everybodys v...
[more]
NYPD Watches From Above (1)
Mark P. wrote:
Fascism is a people problem, not a problem that comes from...
[more]
Attention Gay Wal-Mart Shoppers... (8)
Ben wrote:
My wife works for Walmart. Today Nov 22 there was a meetin...
[more]
Teen Birth Rate at a Record Low (1)
Michael L. Wagner wrote:
According to a Texas A&M University study, students in alm...
[more]
Al Jazeera's First Week Gets Positive Reviews (2)
Larry wrote:
Is it possible that there really is democracy in America? ...
[more]
New Poll: Vast Majority of Iraqis Want U.S. to Go Home (1)
Matteo Tomasini at EPIC wrote:
Just a heads up, this poll is not new; It came out at the ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org
U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records
www.PublicRecordsInfo.com
Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com
Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as
Well as County Property Records Search.
www.PublicRecordsIndex.com














The information on surveillance & reporting of money transfers and tracking has been public information for decades (as part of the ‘war on drugs’).
Similarly, the premise that spies and/or terrorists are/were unaware of the monitoring of phones (wired, cellular & satellite), radios, the Internet, and banking processes, is ridiculous. It’s been described in books, used in films, and is part of all intelligence/counter intelligence training.
Obviously the President, and his advisors, are counting on an ignorant populous, and stagnant and meek news media.
Posted by: D. Darkins on 07/01/06 at 11:59 AM