« Will Gates Open the Floodgates in Iraq? | Blog Index | "Stay the Course" With a Twist »
Iraq Study Group a/k/a Baker Commission Outlines Four Point "Victory Strategy"; Will Likely Call for More Troops
According to an article in the Guardian, officials at the Pentagon working closely with the Iraq Study Group have leaked the key parts of the group's upcoming report. There appears to be a four point "victory strategy." Because President Bush is rumored to be taking the Iraq Study Group's recommendations very seriously, the content below may be as good an indicator of where Iraq policy is headed as we could possibly have. Worth a read. The points are:
(1) Point one of the strategy calls for an increase rather than a decrease in overall US force levels inside Iraq, possibly by as many as 20,000 soldiers.
(2) Point two of the plan stresses the importance of regional cooperation to the successful rehabilitation of Iraq. This could involve the convening of an international conference of neighbouring countries or more direct diplomatic, financial and economic involvement of US allies such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.... Yesterday, a top state department official, David Satterfield, said America was prepared in principle to discuss with Iran its activities in Iraq.
(3) Point three focuses on reviving the national reconciliation process between Shia, Sunni and other ethnic and religious parties. According to the sources, creating a credible political framework will be portrayed as crucial in persuading Iraqis and neighbouring countries alike that Iraq can become a fully functional state.... To the certain dismay of US neo-cons, initial post-invasion ideas about imposing fully-fledged western democratic standards will be set aside.
(4) Lastly, the sources said the study group recommendations will include a call for increased resources to be allocated by Congress to support additional troop deployments and fund the training and equipment of expanded Iraqi army and police forces. It will also stress the need to counter corruption, improve local government and curtail the power of religious courts.
And, yeah, the President seems to be buying it. Here's the lede from the Guardian article: "President George Bush has told senior advisers that the US and its allies must make "a last big push" to win the war in Iraq and that instead of beginning a troop withdrawal next year, he may increase US forces by up to 20,000 soldiers."
For Dave Gilson's and Tom Engelhardt's analysis of how all of this might leave us in Iraq indefinitely for months and years, see this blog post, directly below.
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 11/17/06 at 10:52 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Shades of Vietnam! Remember? “Troops, troops, send more troops!” That was the
battle cry. After 50,000 American deaths, the public wouldn’t stand for any more.
How many will die this time before Bush et. al. get the message?
Posted by: Jerry Elliott on 11/17/06 at 3:14 PM
The American people voted for the Democrats to get us out of Iraq. They have the power of the purse and can cut off funding to encourage the President to bring the troops home within 3 to 6 months. If the Democrats do not deliver, they will get a "thumping" in two years. We need more country and less empire. Don't worry about Iraq, worry about the financial disaster this multi-year never ending war has done to America.
Posted by: John Fleischer on 11/17/06 at 3:48 PM
When you go to war over a made up lie by PM Blair and president Bush they're only one way to get out honorablely that is to load everyone ass up and get the hell out of Iraqi. They are no way will this invasion,and invading of another country to go down as a high point in American history it will be consider a little Hilter and longer we stay
Posted by: shenanigan on 11/17/06 at 4:41 PM
More troops = more senseless killing on both sides. The rest of the Arab countries in the area want nothing to do with any plan the US has to offer. Now that Civil war is in full bloom, Us solutions are as useless now as they were at the beginning of the war.Stop funding the war now.Declare Victory and leave. Then Impeach and imprison the assholes that got us into this. And no you will not control the Oil, that belongs to the Iraq people.
Posted by: Kevin Gallagher on 11/17/06 at 6:09 PM
We did a direct and sudden pullout from Vietnam and they have survived and are prospering. Bush just said so and he thinks it's wonderful. By the same token his logic could be appropos for Iraq.
No matter what is done the American people want out and five to 25 more years of this mess may not only delay the Vietnam situation from happening in Iraq but may destroy Iraq beyond all repair, including all of the middle east. It may severly damage or destroy America beyond all repair. America is now thanks to Bush and the repubs a deeply divided and fractured country. AND, staying there much longer is just one more example of the Bush Gov't NOT listening to the American people. This Baker Bush strategy just sounds like another attempt to preserve dubya's legacy and I don't give a damn about Bush or his entire family. I just want all of them to go live in Paraguay. I am sick of what this one family has done to our beloved America, our troops and the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi families.
George Bush is a dysfunctional human being. The sooner America is rid of him and his entire family the sooner we can all begin the process of putting the world back together again, via DIPLOMACY. Netanyahu and the neocons won't like this approach but then they never like anything which makes me fear for Israel as well.
It's just terrible that the current occupant and the entire repub party is full of chickenhawks and warhawks.
Give peace a chance
Only diplomacy, never war
Posted by: Bob DAmico on 11/18/06 at 6:36 AM
Cheney, Rove & co. are upping the bet against the dems with the huge military/Iraq funding request, backing them into the familiar fearmongering, 9/11 corner. Anyone out there have a definition of victory? Is it a WWII victory? Have any chicken-hawks learned that Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War and stateless terrorism made WWII victory meaningless? Or have our christian-fascists deluded themselves into thinking that the Grenada, Haiti and Panama invasions/coups of small, resource poor, backyard countries work on resource rich, non-homogenous countries on the other side of the globe? Maybe their pause on Iran and N. Korea with known WMD shows some learning.
Posted by: steve on 11/19/06 at 11:21 PM
I thought Baker had more substance than this. Gee...sure sounds "good" on paper. Talk about pie-in-the-sky rhetoric that means nothing, and is misguided at best....
Posted by: Laura Abbott on 11/20/06 at 4:46 PM
I have mixed feelings about solutions for this mess in Iraq. I would just like to remind people though, we allowed this idiot of a president to get us into this mess. Deceived or not, we allowed him to bring us where we are at this point in history. Imagine what response we might get from the Iraqi people if we acknowledged that we royally fucked up. We want to help fix this mess, but yes we royally fucked up. Perhaps they might be more willing to accept our help.
Posted by: daniel reveles on 12/06/06 at 7:01 PM
ARCHIVE
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
January 7, 2007 - January 13, 2007
December 31, 2006 - January 6, 2007
December 24, 2006 - December 30, 2006
December 17, 2006 - December 23, 2006
December 10, 2006 - December 16, 2006
December 3, 2006 - December 9, 2006
November 26, 2006 - December 2, 2006
RECENT COMMENTS
If Only a Doping Scandal Could Mean Victory in Iraq (6)
Elizabeth wrote:
I think John is being facetious, at least I hope so. And I...
[more]
Lawmakers Have a Sense of Humor About This "Paying For Sex" Business (1)
Gotcha wrote:
"only to watch the color drain from the faces of unsuspect...
[more]
How Do You "Make" a Terrorist Threat? (2)
Nomo Jo wrote:
The Thought Police are apparently well-funded and hard at ...
[more]
Political Trivia for July 26 (2)
Nicholas Beaudrot wrote:
Sounds right to me. I almost forgot about the Poland joke ...
[more]
Survey: Muslim Support for Suicide Bombings Declining (5)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
John,
It wouldn't take much. The IRA already bombs people...
[more]
Alabama: Where the Constitution and DNA Don't Matter (2)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
I have a number of issues with the death penalty despite n...
[more]
Dick Morris, Breaking Big Stories. Fred Thompson, Playing the Dirty Money Game (16)
JT Barrie wrote:
"Squeaky Clean" always follows the cleric's rule of thumb...
[more]
Bush/Cheney Threats to the Endangered Species Act (1)
lorsajon wrote:
I pray that Senator McCain gets involved in this because h...
[more]
Leaked Army Karbala Report Shows Iraqi Police Collaborated in Ambush on US Troops (3)
charlie jacksonn wrote:
There is suspicion, by the locals, that the attack was ca...
[more]
FEMA's Post-Brown Efficiency Melts Away (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
I remember at the time the ice was just sitting that conse...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org
U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records
www.PublicRecordsInfo.com
Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com
Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as
Well as County Property Records Search.
www.PublicRecordsIndex.com













As someone who has been against this war from the beginning, I fear a direct pull out to be a poorly conceived idea. This plan is a good starting point and should be discussed thoroughly by our legislative leaders.
Posted by: Edward on 11/17/06 at 2:20 PM