« Obama's New Spending Proposal, and Possible Motivations | Blog Index | How NYPD Blocked Anti-Bush Protest at 2004 Convention »
Pace, Gates Finally Admit Troops Smart Enough to Understand Debate Over Iraq
We all know the common line the Bush Administration, military leaders, and Republicans in Congress have used to stifle debate on Iraq: Questioning the president's policies undermines the troops, who think they are being sent to war without the support of the American public.
When John McCain made this argument on Face the Nation in mid-January by saying, "if we voice disapproval and send our young troops on their way... what message does it send to the troops? That we disapprove of what they're doing but we still support them, but not their mission?" I wrote the following:
I think the troops get it. They aren't dumb. They have the mental capacity to understand the following: The war is over. We've lost. We didn't lose because of them. We don't blame them. We support them in what they are doing. If that means killing bad guys, fine. We don't think that helps anything anymore, but if they must perform well on the battlefield to avoid being hurt or killed, godspeed. But most of all, we want them all to be safe, and home as soon as possible. We know and they know that what they are doing isn't helping anything.
I don't think that's an overly complex set of beliefs or emotions. To say that it confuses the troops is an insult to their intelligence.
Turns out that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Peter Pace see things my way.
Gates to the House Armed Services Committee: "I think [the troops are] sophisticated enough to understand that [finding the best way to win the war is] what the debate's really about."
Pace to the same Committee: "As long as this Congress continues to do what it has done, which is to provide the resources for the mission, the dialogue will be the dialogue, and the troops will feel supported."
Pace again: "There's no doubt in my mind that the dialogue here in Washington strengthens our democracy. Period."
Yes, of course. The most important point here is Gates'. The troops aren't stupid, they know their country can debate the value of their actions while still supporting them. To assume they can't is patronizing. Besides, they know better than anyone in this country that things aren't working in Iraq. I'm amazed that Democrats' haven't made this point more forcefully the last few years.
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 02/08/07 at 7:34 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33