« Americans Vote on Top Presidents | Blog Index | Columnist, Tired Of Doing the Woman Beat, Resigns From Chicago Paper »
It's Time to Point Something Out About Newsweek Covers
Namely, that they are all the same.
The most recent cover of Newsweek has a single figure on a white background, with a coverline in heavy black text and a single word printed in red for emphasis. Don't think that this stark look -- with its solitary figure and harsh colors -- was chosen because it makes sense for a story on depression amongst American men. It was chosen because Newsweek has used the same look on roughly 50% of its covers in the last three months.
Take a look below. They clearly have research that tells them exactly how to sell magazines.




Posted by Jonathan Stein on 02/19/07 at 2:00 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
I give them a thumbs up for aiming for "a look".
Posted by:
Agen Schmitz
on 02/19/07 at 8:55 PM
In design parlance, it's called "white space."
You can read about it on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_space_(visual_arts)
With today's magazines all crowded with images and text, they now appear as background noise on the typical newspaper or bookstore magazine rack.
White space on the magazine cover provides a stark contrast that stands out - in addition to the benefits of white space.
Posted by: Paul on 02/19/07 at 10:46 PM
Why have vastly different styles to your magazine cover? That makes them less recogniseable to the people who want to buy it.
Posted by: Eric Blade on 02/20/07 at 12:06 AM
Wow... shocking exposé :P
Posted by: Guy Incognito on 02/20/07 at 4:27 AM
what's far more disconcerting is when Newsweek's US cover is different from the Europe, Latin America and Asia covers as has been the case often of late. And every time the US cover is clearly more favorable to the Bush administration. Guess Americans don't need to know about Global Warming's First Victim or, god forbid, the truth about how we are "Losing Afghanistan."
The latter cover story, along with the scary looking terrorist photo gave way to a fluff piece on photographer Annie Leibovitz. Certainly this had nothing to do with the November elections two months away. Newsweek, being a news mag and all, wouldn't want to inform the American people or sway the elections.
But this is the same mag that recently wrote retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was "still unwilling to plunge into politics" as some Iraq study group members did when President Bush rejected their proposal. STILL? It's almost as if Newsweek was suggesting that the swing vote in the country's most controversial and partisan decision of all time, was apolitical. Never mind a career more political than most Justices which included running for public office a couple of times and serving as Arizona Republican Senate Majority Whip.
O'Connor is about as apolitical as Newsweek is a news magazine.
Posted by: hotpotatomash on 02/20/07 at 1:49 PM
I was shocked to read that Paul would describe the Newsweek cover as beneficial white space. You'd think that in our day and age that we white folk would be ready to share space on magazine covers like Newsweek but I guess we still have a ways to go. So sad.
Posted by: Deacon on 02/21/07 at 4:20 PM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Jonathan Stein, who posted this, is very observant. I don't think anyone else in the world noticed this pattern. Hats off to you Jonathan- keep up the great investigative journalism. I think Newsweek is doing it to mess with us subliminally.
Posted by: Demopublican on 02/19/07 at 3:03 PM