« Bill Richardson Serious About This "Running for President" Thing | Blog Index | One for the Bizarro File »
Important Gay Rights Bills Likely to Pass This Session
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports today that two breakthrough bills for gays and lesbians are likely to be passed by the new Democratic Congress. Both possibilities have me on the brink of tears of joy, they are so overdue and yet still seem so implausible. The first is an employment discrimination ban. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) projects that the bill will even include gender identity—which, to have any teeth, it must, lest employers shift from discriminating against those who are queer to those who act queer (which it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out they've long since done).
The only problem with this bill—and it’s a major one—is that churches and small businesses would be exempt. Churches: Feh—I don't have the energy to wade into the constitutionally murky waters of whether they should be exempt or not. But small businesses, which is to say most businesses? Why should they be exempt? No one is talking about a quota; the issue is whether GLBT people are turned away from positions for which they are qualified.
The other bill would include GLBT identity among those covered by hate-crimes legislation. That's right, nearly 10 years after Matthew Shephard was executed there is no national hate-crimes protection for GLBT people, who make up 14 percent of all victims of hate crimes. If that's not reason enough to support it, here's what Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council has to say: "It's taking us to the point where anyone who opposes the sexual behavior of homosexuals will be silenced." Now, he's probably exaggerating, but just for a moment imagine the utopia of not having to listen to the invented slanderous anecdotes and statistics about GLBTs groups like Perkins' generate. The sweet, sweet silence of it.
But before you let those tears of joy trickle down your cheeks, remember on whose desk the veto pen rests.
Posted by Cameron Scott on 02/24/07 at 5:46 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Oi, Cam! Re "...But small businesses, which is to say most businesses? Why should they be exempt?"
Piss off, you feelthy Marxist. I help run a Small Family Business. We'll hire who we damn well please. Affirmative action is a shambolic farce that turns it's back on meritocracy and openly awards incompetence...hmmm, just like Government, ay wot?
Posted by: GreginOz on 02/25/07 at 10:17 PM
I'm scratching my head over the last two posts.
Affirmative action in the sense of hiring to fulfill a quota is not the same as preventing an employer legally from firing you because you are gay. [The article even reiterated this point.] Firing a good employee because of who they love is the true disregard of meritocracy, GreginOz, but I suspect by your flippant [and was is supposed to be Pirate-like?] tone that you might just be kidding.
Stephen - lot's of good inventions in the history of humanity. Like this one: . It's called a period and it really works! That last one was an exclamation point, but I could go on and on, you know? [Question mark]
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/26/07 at 5:31 AM
It's good to have protection for these people, but, it would be a better world if we could have common decency without having to legislate it. It certainly would be a dull world, if everyone was just another duplicate of the other, but, we are taught to fear anything or anyone that is a little different.
Posted by: Ranselar VanDerpoel on 02/26/07 at 6:48 AM
There could still be tons of human variation while still having a more tolerant overall world view.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/26/07 at 7:08 AM
Those exemptions almost certainly are there because they are also there in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. I haven't read the bill, but I would assume it borrows heavily from the CRA, which exempts churches and very small businesses from anti-discrimination legislation. The small businesses in question are likely to be family-owned/run places.
I'm not saying it's good they are exempted, but this is probably why.
Posted by: adam on 02/26/07 at 7:41 AM
I almost get the church exemption thing [just because they don't pay taxes, either, so maybe the precident comes from that in some weird connection] but I don't get the small business exemption. I own two small businesses and can't think of a logical reason.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/26/07 at 8:32 AM
I, personally, am not anti-gay BUT...if one owns a small business then one's views count. If you can't stand flaming queens then why would you employ one? Laws aren't going to force you to hire one, your personal tastes will sort out who gets the job. My point in general is that, as OWNER of a business, who the fu*k is going to tell me how to run it?
Posted by: GreginOz on 02/26/07 at 4:08 PM
Well now that you put it that way, GreginOz, I get you completely. After all, ALL gay people are flaming queens?
If you're selling bigoted observations you must make a fortune in your business.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/26/07 at 6:19 PM
That's not what you said last night, big boy.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/27/07 at 11:07 AM
Only the white christian straight man is not protected by these "hate crime bills" and God knows that we suffer more than anybody else from hate.
Posted by: Lars Hanson the Viking on 02/28/07 at 8:02 AM
Who do you hate, Lars?
Posted by: Paul Miller on 02/28/07 at 5:48 PM
White Christian Straight Men are victims of hate crimes every day. We are the persecuted minority. I speak from personal experience. But as Christ said, love your enemies which we do. But we are also to seek to protect ourselves from the hateful bigots who hate us.
Posted by: Lars on 02/28/07 at 7:26 PM
Oh, Lars, how you make me laugh. It took me a while to get the joke.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 03/01/07 at 4:44 AM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
politics is just diffrent opinions and no sole person can take blame for mistake or guidance but can only trust what the american people want from stephen d macmillan 20 glen rd hyannnisport,ma 02601 presidential republican inventer of the internet microcom in the 80s the most jobs created in history and economics and also a navy vet
Posted by: stephen d macmillan president republican on 02/25/07 at 1:40 PM